Hi Joel,
2012/7/3 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com:
Hi All,
This seems to be one of the most consistent complaints from users as I'm
going through the bug list. The issue is three fold (or more).
1. Defaults hijack everything -- vs. defaulting to allow users to select
2. No check to see
I agree that it was limited for types and your ideas both sound promising.
I've included UX mailing list for input because I think ultimately it would
be really nice to be able to easily and quickly change file associations
for LO. I lean more towards a separate set of options that lists every
Hi,
On Tue, Jul 3, 2012 at 9:12 PM, Andras Timar tima...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Joel,
2012/7/3 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com:
Hi All,
This seems to be one of the most consistent complaints from users as I'm
going through the bug list. The issue is three fold (or more).
1. Defaults
Hi All,
This seems to be one of the most consistent complaints from users as I'm
going through the bug list. The issue is three fold (or more).
1. Defaults hijack everything -- vs. defaulting to allow users to select
2. No check to see if Microsoft Office is installed and thus some prompt to
Hi Joel,
2012/7/3 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com:
Hi All,
This seems to be one of the most consistent complaints from users as I'm
going through the bug list. The issue is three fold (or more).
1. Defaults hijack everything -- vs. defaulting to allow users to select
2. No check to see
I agree that it was limited for types and your ideas both sound promising.
I've included UX mailing list for input because I think ultimately it would
be really nice to be able to easily and quickly change file associations
for LO. I lean more towards a separate set of options that lists every