On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 14:13 +, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 12:26 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Dialog is fragile and tricky :-(
So - given that the dialog was moved to cui, is not public, and has
only one constructor in the factory method - would something like the
On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 14:32 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
Nah, I recall some more of the details now. The virtual methods that
are a problem are those of SpellDialogChildWindow. Your patch call
Ah - hideous :-) so we'd want to expose that late init via the abstract
dialog factory, and
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 17:07 +0100, Cedric Bosdonnat wrote:
Hello people,
Could someone review and cherry-pick -s this commit into -3-5 branch?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=adf45eced404c33be6db884a3e809725e7975872
FWIW, the nastiness in that SpellDialog is that
On Tue, 2012-02-28 at 12:26 +, Caolán McNamara wrote:
FWIW, the nastiness in that SpellDialog is that there are a bunch of
things which would be natural to put directly into the ctor, but they
would require calling virtual methods during construction, which doesn't
work in c++, so there's
Hello people,
Could someone review and cherry-pick -s this commit into -3-5 branch?
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=adf45eced404c33be6db884a3e809725e7975872
Thanks,
--
Cedric
___
LibreOffice mailing list
