On Tue, Apr 28, 2020 at 03:02:47PM +0200, Julien Nabet wrote:
> Would you be ok to remove and replace deprecated functions from ODBC < 3.0
> or do you think about some cons?
Yeah, probably. Ideally that would be along with testing against an
array of different ODBC drivers, but let's not get too
Thank you Alex for your reply.
I declared https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132499
"Remove any remnants from ODBC < 3.0 + add missing functions"
Julien
--
Sent from:
http://document-foundation-mail-archive.969070.n3.nabble.com/Dev-f1639786.html
Le 28/04/2020 à 15:02, Julien Nabet a écrit :
Hi Julien,
> Would you be ok to remove and replace deprecated functions from ODBC <
> 3.0 or do you think about some cons?
>
I would have thought / hoped that by now, no one working with LO over
ODBC is using any ODBC driver stuff that calls
Hello Lionel, Robert and Alex,
I didn't reproduce the pb of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122779 "(FILEOPEN
(BASE) Connection to Oracle DB via ODBC ends in [ODBC][ORACLE] Optional
Feature not implemented)"
but had a segfault when closing table.
Trying to take a look
