Hi,
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 04:22:53PM +0100, jan iversen wrote:
> When I used =internal I got a mixture of 2.7 and 3.5 header files.
So, unless we use =internal for release builds -- which looking at
distro-configs/LibreOfficeMacOSX.conf does not seem to be the case -- configure
should just barf
> BTW, it seems the right option is "fully-internal" since I can read this on
> configure.ac:
> 1172 AC_ARG_ENABLE(python,
> 1173
> AS_HELP_STRING([--enable-python=],
yes it is, sorry was not at my computer when I wrote the reply.
rgds
jan I.
___
On 17/12/2016 16:22, jan iversen wrote:
So I wonder what Python version should be used for LO master sources?
I used --enable-python=internal but my config.log displays some 2.7 ref, see
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103363#c15
I had build problems on osx sierra, due to th
On Sat, Dec 17, 2016 at 04:22:53PM +0100, jan iversen wrote:
> > So I wonder what Python version should be used for LO master sources?
> > I used --enable-python=internal but my config.log displays some 2.7 ref, see
> > https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103363#c15
> >
> I had bui
> So I wonder what Python version should be used for LO master sources?
> I used --enable-python=internal but my config.log displays some 2.7 ref, see
> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103363#c15
>
I had build problems on osx sierra, due to the fact that I installed Python3
(o
3.5 in
configure.ac (see
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/configure.ac#8266)
Any thoughts?
Julien
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/About-Python-version-tp4202959.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.