Re: OS X build signature
Surely copying files into an app bundle has been a bad idea forever, even before GateKeeper started being picky about it? The sane thing would be to keep the language pack stuff in a user-specific directory. (Ditto for extensions.) No, I am not volunteering. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: OS X build signature
Stephan Bergmann wrote: For another, our language pack mechanism copies files into an existing LO installation, which is not endorsed at least by the updated (= 10.9.5) GateKeeper: D'oh, that sucks. I wonder how Firefox handles that, presumably they copy files into the tree with their incremental updates, too? https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1072538 and https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1082961 seem relevant. Cheers, -- Thorsten signature.asc Description: Digital signature ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: OS X build signature
On 01/30/2015 12:38 AM, V Stuart Foote wrote: So with release of 4.4.0 we appear to still have issues with OS X 10.9 and 10.10 Gatekeeper fussing over the package signing. should be fixed on master towards LO 4.5 with http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=615fae2f67028f3c5c51c70c77dbaa9b9f3856d6 Attempt at fixing Mac OS X code signing; backports to libreoffice-4-4 and libreoffice-4-4-1 pending ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
OS X build signature
So with release of 4.4.0 we appear to still have issues with OS X 10.9 and 10.10 Gatekeeper fussing over the package signing. An easy work around to by-pass Gatekeeper, but it seems like we have a correct Apple v2 signature and should not have to be asking folks to. Is that not the case? https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84352 Unfortunately the work around now needs to be added to the release notes. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OS-X-build-signature-tp4138158.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: OS X build signature
There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things 1) change gatekeeper settings 2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again. On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 12:38 AM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote: So with release of 4.4.0 we appear to still have issues with OS X 10.9 and 10.10 Gatekeeper fussing over the package signing. An easy work around to by-pass Gatekeeper, but it seems like we have a correct Apple v2 signature and should not have to be asking folks to. Is that not the case? https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84352 Unfortunately the work around now needs to be added to the release notes. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OS-X-build-signature-tp4138158.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: OS X build signature
Jonathan Aquilina wrote There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things 1) change gatekeeper settings 2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again. Of course-- there are work arounds. But, why are the Apple signatures of our builds not passing OS X Gatekeeper muster and allowing a seamless installation. Why instead must users relax Gatekeeper to globally accept untrusted packages--not acceptable, or preferably must perform a one-time by-pass to allow LibreOffice to install/configure to completion. It should not be needed if we have done our signature and Apple registration correctly. Additionally, we now need to explain the issue, and work around(s), to OS X users in the release notes. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OS-X-build-signature-tp4138158p4138179.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Re: OS X build signature
They dont need to relax the gatekeeper settings they go in and just hit open, but I agree it can get a bit annoying, What would i need to do to try and help figure out why this is happening? On Fri, Jan 30, 2015 at 6:20 AM, V Stuart Foote vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu wrote: Jonathan Aquilina wrote There is a way around that all one has to do to open libreoffice is go to system preferences and go to securty and you can do one of two things 1) change gatekeeper settings 2) open libreoffice. After that it doesnt prompt you again. Of course-- there are work arounds. But, why are the Apple signatures of our builds not passing OS X Gatekeeper muster and allowing a seamless installation. Why instead must users relax Gatekeeper to globally accept untrusted packages--not acceptable, or preferably must perform a one-time by-pass to allow LibreOffice to install/configure to completion. It should not be needed if we have done our signature and Apple registration correctly. Additionally, we now need to explain the issue, and work around(s), to OS X users in the release notes. -- View this message in context: http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/OS-X-build-signature-tp4138158p4138179.html Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice -- Jonathan Aquilina ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
