Hi Regina,
On Mon, May 03, 2021 at 08:25:42PM +0200, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> That means, I do not sent the information to the child, but the child
> fetches it from the parent. I like your idea.
>
> Shape::addChildren() is called with a reference to the group shape. So there
> the parent
Hi Miklos,
answer below.
Miklos Vajna schrieb am 03.05.2021 um 15:47:
Hi Regina,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:39:41PM +0200, Regina Henschel
wrote:
So I still need a way to transport the values from the group to its
children. Besides my first idea to put all group infos into a struct and use
Hi Regina,
On Fri, Apr 30, 2021 at 04:39:41PM +0200, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> So I still need a way to transport the values from the group to its
> children. Besides my first idea to put all group infos into a struct and use
> that instead of the aTransformation parameter, I can also think to
Hi Miklos,
Miklos Vajna schrieb am 30.04.2021 um 10:19:
Hi Regina,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:03:14AM +0200, Regina Henschel
wrote:
Overnight, I found a much easier way. I only need to apply the rotation of
the child shape around its center after applying the parent transformation.
Please
Hi Regina,
On Thu, Apr 29, 2021 at 11:03:14AM +0200, Regina Henschel
wrote:
> Overnight, I found a much easier way. I only need to apply the rotation of
> the child shape around its center after applying the parent transformation.
>
> Please excuse me for bothering you with this problem.
Ah,
Hi all,
Overnight, I found a much easier way. I only need to apply the rotation
of the child shape around its center after applying the parent
transformation.
Please excuse me for bothering you with this problem.
Kind regards
Regina
___
Hi all,
if a child shape in a group is rotated, then it is currently imported
wrongly. The visual effect of the wrong import is, that the shape might
be skewed.
The correct behavior would be:
1. Build transformation matrix Mg for the unrotated group shape. Would
use "off" and "ext" from
