>
> Anything else that I could do to grow trust, so that maybe Winfrieds patch
> can make it to 3.5.3 ?
I pushed it on libreoffice-3.5
it will be there in 3.5.3
Norbert
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedes
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (21-02-12 13:03)
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Just to be sure: people eligible to do reviews, are those delivering
code, or solely those with commit access?
I would say a competent developer, and/or someone willing to take the
ri
On Tue, 2012-02-21 at 00:32 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> Just to be sure: people eligible to do reviews, are those delivering
> code, or solely those with commit access?
I would say a competent developer, and/or someone willing to take the
risk - that can be reduced a lot by showing impress
Jan Holesovsky wrote (20-02-12 18:04)
> Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
> needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
> reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
> freeze (I remember the SmartArt import).
Hi Kendy,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (20-02-12 18:04)
Nope, still 3 I am afraid :-( - after the feature freeze, before we even
needed 1 review for pushing to the libreoffice-3-5 branch, it was 3
reviews for a feature or two that got in few days after the feature
freeze (I remember the SmartArt import
Hi Cor,
On 2012-02-20 at 17:44 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Anyhow - I don't see a special case for bending the rules of triple
> > reviews, nor a reason to refuse it if it gets that widespread
> > support :-) it's a nice fix.
>
> Thanks, that sounds encouraging.
> As written: going for 3.5.2
Hi Michael,
Michael Meeks wrote (20-02-12 17:13)
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least)
Hi Cor,
On Mon, 2012-02-20 at 15:22 +0100, Cor Nouws wrote:
> > Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
> >> Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
> >> The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
> >> least).
:-) it is some
Hi Kendy, *,
Jan Holesovsky wrote (14-02-12 14:47)
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at least).
The problem is that it is partially a feature,
Hi Winfried,
Winfried Donkers píše v Út 14. 02. 2012 v 07:44 +0100:
> Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
> The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
> least).
The problem is that it is partially a feature, and introduces new
strings :-( - so
Olivier Hallot wrote (14 februari 2012)
>The new schema with the paper size will work with older versions of
>LibreOffice and OpenOffice? In other words, if I replace Labels.xcu from
>older OOo, with the new one, is it going to break the label feature or
>not of OOo?
It will work with 'old style'
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi
Em 14-02-2012 04:44, Winfried Donkers escreveu:
> Can this patch be pushed to 3.4 and 3.5 branches as well?
> The patch addresses problem that go way back in time (pre-LibreOffice at
> least).
>
>
> Winfried
Just a question...
The new schema w
12 matches
Mail list logo
