On Sat, Jun 28, 2014 at 01:29:24AM +0100, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk
wrote:
If Word's autocorrect kicks in, that's considered a separate action from
what the user did, so if I mis-type then Word autocorrupts, the first
ctrl-z reverses the autocorrupt, and I need a second ctrl-z to
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't
remember whether it was a Writer table or Calc). Anyways, I filled the
cell and
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:34 +0200, Kevin André wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
too long ago to remember the details, and it was in a cell (can't
remember whether it
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Kohei Yoshida
kohei.yosh...@collabora.com wrote:
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 16:34 +0200, Kevin André wrote:
On Fri, Jun 6, 2014 at 1:42 PM, Wols Lists antli...@youngman.org.uk wrote:
That's one of my moans (maybe it's been fixed) about LO spellcheck! It's
too
On Mon, 2014-06-30 at 17:13 +0200, Kevin André wrote:
On Mon, Jun 30, 2014 at 4:41 PM, Kohei Yoshida
Just so you know, piggybacking on a thread and say please fix my
favorite bug I filed x years ago is not appreciated.
Sorry if I offended you.
No offense was taken; I just did not
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 12:42 +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
Why can't LibreOffice treat it as two separate steps, INCLUDING for
things like undo? Treat the copy as one operation, then the sort as a
second operation, and if you need to undo it then it's two ctrl-z,
not one?
I'll take this idea. I
On 27/06/14 17:22, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 12:42 +0100, Wols Lists wrote:
Why can't LibreOffice treat it as two separate steps, INCLUDING for
things like undo? Treat the copy as one operation, then the sort as a
second operation, and if you need to undo it then it's two
On 06/06/14 12:27, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Good. Now I have someone real I can ask.
Can I ask in what use case this feature is used? Why does your use case
require that copying and sorting have to be done in one step, rather
than in two separate steps?
Why can't LibreOffice treat it as two
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 07:50 +0200, Winfried Donkers wrote:
Hi Kohei,
Yes. I'm almost certain that some enterprise users actually use this
feature.
I'd like to know they still exist though, rather than speculating that they
still do.
I hate to disappoint you, but the company I
Hi Kohei,
Good. Now I have someone real I can ask.
Can I ask in what use case this feature is used? Why does your use case
require that copying and sorting have to be done in one step, rather than in
two separate steps?
Well, we're talking of a company, I don't use it personally.
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
place.
I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got removed.
The UI is a bit awkward, and not clear what the associated two fields
(left
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got
removed.
Especially with Calc Writer, it is a relatively safe bet that every
obscure feature is absolutely necessary for someone's workflow.
Just sayin,
-- Thorsten
signature.asc
Description: Digital
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 21:57 +0200, Thorsten Behrens wrote:
Kohei Yoshida wrote:
I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got
removed.
Especially with Calc Writer, it is a relatively safe bet that every
obscure feature is absolutely necessary for someone's workflow.
Hello,
Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:33:13 +0200, Kohei Yoshida
kohei.yosh...@collabora.com a écrit:
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
place.
I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 22:52 +0200, Mat M wrote:
Hello,
Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:33:13 +0200, Kohei Yoshida
kohei.yosh...@collabora.com a écrit:
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 17:20 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 22:52 +0200, Mat M wrote:
Hello,
Le Thu, 05 Jun 2014 19:33:13 +0200, Kohei Yoshida
kohei.yosh...@collabora.com a écrit:
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to
Hi Kohei,
On Thursday, 2014-06-05 13:33:13 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
place.
I'm just wondering if anyone would miss this feature if it got removed.
On Fri, 2014-06-06 at 00:23 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Kohei,
On Thursday, 2014-06-05 13:33:13 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
place.
I'm just
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Kohei Yoshida
kohei.yosh...@collabora.com wrote:
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
place.
When we've deprecated/removed other features, how did we handle that
On Thu, 2014-06-05 at 19:54 -0400, Robinson Tryon wrote:
On Thu, Jun 5, 2014 at 1:33 PM, Kohei Yoshida
kohei.yosh...@collabora.com wrote:
In Calc, you can go to Data - Sort, and choose to copy the sorted
results to someplace else, rather than the default option of sorting in
place.
When
Hi Kohei,
Yes. I'm almost certain that some enterprise users actually use this
feature.
I'd like to know they still exist though, rather than speculating that they
still do.
I hate to disappoint you, but the company I work with does.
And I would think that LibreOffice would aim to
21 matches
Mail list logo
