On 02/06/2015 12:58 PM, Christian Lohmaier wrote:
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
Asking because I see no good reason for it and it repeatedly gets in my way
with its two major drawbacks:
I think the goal was to avoid hitting commandline limits on
On 02/07/2015 11:37 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
For another, it makes it more tedious to copy/modify/paste make
(w/o -s) output for some little one-off things like asking the
compiler to produce -S instead of -c output for some
On Wed, Feb 04, 2015 at 03:22:04PM +0100, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
For another, it makes it more tedious to copy/modify/paste make
(w/o -s) output for some little one-off things like asking the
compiler to produce -S instead of -c output for some .cxx.
How so exactly? I remember from when I
Hi Stephan, *,
On Wed, Feb 4, 2015 at 3:22 PM, Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com wrote:
Asking because I see no good reason for it and it repeatedly gets in my way
with its two major drawbacks:
I think the goal was to avoid hitting commandline limits on windows -
where the build indeed did
Asking because I see no good reason for it and it repeatedly gets in my
way with its two major drawbacks:
For one, it prevents use of '...' instead of ... in certain places in
recipes where the former would flow much more naturally from the fingers.
For another, it makes it more tedious to
