On 04/28/2012 09:27 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
With this ugly (work-in-progress) hack (needed only in gbuild-part) make
check command pass now on Ubuntu 11.10 (with default --as-needed linker
option)
I'm not sure, if this is the best place to do it.
Note:
I did it unconditionally: the production
On 26.04.2012 15:04, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
[I accidentally sent this response to David only...]
Original Message
Subject: Re: make check problem in libtest_smoketest building master
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:10:19 +0200
From: Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com
To: David
On Wednesday 25 of April 2012, David Ostrovsky wrote:
On 13.04.2012 11:35, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 14:40, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?
It looks like Fedora is also going to do this:
[I accidentally sent this response to David only...]
Original Message
Subject: Re: make check problem in libtest_smoketest building master
Date: Thu, 26 Apr 2012 08:10:19 +0200
From: Stephan Bergmann sberg...@redhat.com
To: David Ostrovsky david.ostrov...@gmx.de
On 04/25/2012
On 13.04.2012 11:35, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 14:40, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?
It looks like Fedora is also going to do this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
I'm willing to write a
On 04/22/2012 10:51 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
your patch was still not pushed.
So we have two options here:
1. push your patch (I attached it with description ;-)
2. use make interactive variable LDFLAGS, a lá make
LDFLAGS='-Wl,--no-as-needed' check
Any ideas on this?
I still do not see why
On 23/04/12 09:49, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/22/2012 10:51 PM, David Ostrovsky wrote:
your patch was still not pushed.
So we have two options here:
1. push your patch (I attached it with description ;-)
2. use make interactive variable LDFLAGS, a lá make
LDFLAGS='-Wl,--no-as-needed'
Hi Matúš,
your patch was still not pushed.
So we have two options here:
1. push your patch (I attached it with description ;-)
2. use make interactive variable LDFLAGS, a lá make
LDFLAGS='-Wl,--no-as-needed' check
Any ideas on this?
Ciao
David
On 13.04.2012 12:40, Matúš Kukan wrote:
On 11
On 2012-04-12 14:40, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?
It looks like Fedora is also going to do this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
I'm willing to write a configure test to add the --no-as-needed flag
On 13/04/12 11:35, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 14:40, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?
It looks like Fedora is also going to do this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
this is a different change:
On 11 April 2012 14:24, Noel Grandin n...@peralex.com wrote:
Building on Ubuntu 64-bit, make check is failing because of a missing
symbol in libtest_smoketest.so.
Doing a make smoketest.clean doesn't seem to help.
The library does genuinely seem to be missing the symbol (readelf log
On 04/13/2012 11:35 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 14:40, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?
It looks like Fedora is also going to do this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking
No, as already detailed
On 2012-04-13 12:48, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Noel, do you happen to be affected because you are on a pre-final
natty release (whatever that is)?
I'm running 11.10 (Oneiric) which is the latest production release.
Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
Hi,
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:48:24PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I would still prefer to simply insist on Ubuntu fixing their tool
chain.
Well, Ubuntu (and I think Debian too) are defaulting to as-needed for:
- deps (which claims OpenSUSE doing the same)
Hi,
I'm running into the same issue:
[ build RGM ]
CustomTarget/jurt/test/com/sun/star/lib/uno/protocols/urp/registry.rdb
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'CppUnit::DynamicLibraryManagerException'
what(): Symbol [cppunitTestPlugIn] not found in dynamic
On 04/13/2012 01:42 PM, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 12:48:24PM +0200, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
I would still prefer to simply insist on Ubuntu fixing their tool
chain.
Well, Ubuntu (and I think Debian too) are defaulting to as-needed for:
- deps (which claims OpenSUSE
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 01:44:23PM +0200, David Ostrovsky wrote:
Hi,
I'm running into the same issue:
[ build RGM ]
CustomTarget/jurt/test/com/sun/star/lib/uno/protocols/urp/registry.rdb
terminate called after throwing an instance of
'CppUnit::DynamicLibraryManagerException'
On 04/12/2012 09:49 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-11 16:29, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Looks like the dynamic loader on your system does not support dlsym to
report a symbol not exported by the lib itself, but only indirectly by
a lib the first lib links against.
Darn, I would have thought
On 2012-04-12 10:22, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Please find out whether the assumption is correct (see Lubos' mail on
LD_DEBUG).
I tried
LD_DEBUG=symbols make check
but it produced so much output it seems to have broken the build - it
eventually froze up during a link step.
How do I run
On 04/12/2012 10:30 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 10:22, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Please find out whether the assumption is correct (see Lubos' mail on
LD_DEBUG).
I tried
LD_DEBUG=symbols make check
but it produced so much output it seems to have broken the build - it
eventually
Stephan Bergmann píše v St 11. 04. 2012 v 16:29 +0200:
On 04/11/2012 02:24 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Building on Ubuntu 64-bit, make check is failing because of a missing
symbol in libtest_smoketest.so.
Doing a make smoketest.clean doesn't seem to help.
The library does genuinely seem to be
On 04/12/2012 11:05 AM, Petr Mladek wrote:
Stephan Bergmann píše v St 11. 04. 2012 v 16:29 +0200:
Looks like the dynamic loader on your system does not support dlsym to
report a symbol not exported by the lib itself, but only indirectly by a
lib the first lib links against.
I wonder if it
On 04/12/2012 10:48 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Output attached.
[...]
10709: symbol=dlsym; lookup in file=/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libdl.so.2
[0]
10709: symbol=cppunitTestPlugIn; lookup in
file=/home/noel/libo/workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/CppunitTest/libtest_smoketest.so
On 2012-04-12 11:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What is the output of
readelf -d
workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/CppunitTest/libtest_smoketest.so
for you?
Output attached.
Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
noel@ubuntu:~/libo$ readelf -d
On 12/04/12 12:32, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 11:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What is the output of
readelf -d
workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/CppunitTest/libtest_smoketest.so
for you?
Output attached.
0x0001 (NEEDED) Shared library: [libc.so.6]
On 2012-04-12 11:56, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Sounds plausible. Just asked Noel for readelf -d output for
verification. I would consider an ld that assumes --as-needed per
default as broken.
For whatever reason, Ubuntu appears to do that now:
On 2012-04-12 12:40, Michael Stahl wrote:
it should work if you do this: cd smoketest make -r clean make
-r LDFLAGS=-Wl,--no-as-needed subsequentcheck
Indeed that works (not entirely, but at least it gets past the symbol
loading issue).
Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html
Zitat von Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com:
On 12/04/12 12:32, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 11:51, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
What is the output of
readelf -d
workdir/unxlngx6.pro/LinkTarget/CppunitTest/libtest_smoketest.so
for you?
Output attached.
0x0001 (NEEDED)
On 04/12/2012 12:40 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
wonder what we should do about ld that defaults to --as-needed...
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?
For the smoketest problem at hand, the best thing would probably be to
get rid of the broken test_smoketest vs.
On 04/11/2012 02:24 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Building on Ubuntu 64-bit, make check is failing because of a missing
symbol in libtest_smoketest.so.
Doing a make smoketest.clean doesn't seem to help.
The library does genuinely seem to be missing the symbol (readelf log
attached).
In the case of
On Wednesday 11 of April 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
On 04/11/2012 02:24 PM, Noel Grandin wrote:
Building on Ubuntu 64-bit, make check is failing because of a missing
symbol in libtest_smoketest.so.
Doing a make smoketest.clean doesn't seem to help.
The library does genuinely seem to be
31 matches
Mail list logo
