[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Make error code in Calc related to formulas easier to understand (e.g. with hints in a tooltip)

2023-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
@libreoffic ||e.org Version|4.2.4.2 release |Inherited From OOo Hardware|Other |All Summary|EDITING: Make error code in |EDITING: Make error code in |Calc related

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Make error code in Calc related to formulas easier to understand

2023-04-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 Stéphane Guillou (stragu) changed: What|Removed |Added CC||enrico9...@gmail.com

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Make error code in Calc related to formulas easier to understand

2018-12-18 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|EDITING: Make error |E

Re: LO make error on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.4

2018-04-04 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Clearly nobody has built with a good compiler that is eager to generate warnings, dbglevel=2, and --enable-werror in a while, if ever. One more reason for us to get rid of the dbglevel crack. --tml ___ LibreOffice mailing list

LO make error on MacOS High Sierra 10.13.4

2018-04-04 Thread Ch g
1. git fetch origin && git reset --hard origin/master 2. autogen.input: --enable-dbgutil --enable-debug --enable-symbols --disable-cve-tests --without-junit --with-build-version=$(date +"MacD%Y-%m-%d") --with-vendor=Almas Inc. --enable-scripting-javascript #EOF #comment: because I've always failed

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Make error messages related to formulas easier to understand

2017-01-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 Jouni Järvinen changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

Re: make error: undefined reference to

2017-01-21 Thread Jan Iversen
HI As I told you on IRC. you miss the Collada library, this was not downloaded when you downloaded build-dependencies. This is something that happens quite frequently, because the build-dependencies are fixed with the ubuntu version, and thus if we on master start using a new library it will

make error: undefined reference to

2017-01-21 Thread Alekhya Vellanki
Hi! I have been trying to build LibreOffice from the past few days and I'm getting stuck. After running ./autogen.sh, I executed the command "make" just as how it as mentioned here . But I got the following errors.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Make error messages related to formulas easier to understand

2016-07-24 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC|

How to solve the make error in building the libreoffice source on Windows?

2014-07-16 Thread Zhen Anddavid
Hi, All I'm trying to build the LibreOffice 4.3.0.0 source on Windows 7 and Visual Studio 2012. But while building, I encountered the error. The error follows as below. [build DEP] LNK:StaticLibrary/wrapper.lib [build CXX] solenv/gcc-wrappers/gcc.cxx [build DEP] LNK:StaticLibrary/wrapper.lib

Re: How to solve the make error in building the libreoffice source on Windows?

2014-07-16 Thread Zhen Anddavid
I used following instruction before executes the make instruction. ./autogen.sh --with-ant-home=/cygdrive/f/0-Office-Work/libreoffice-4.3.0.0/Tools/apache-ant-1.9.3/ --without-junit --disable-activex --disable-directx --enable-dbgutil --without-help --without-myspell-dicts --without-doxygen

Re: How to solve the make error in building the libreoffice source on Windows?

2014-07-16 Thread Christian Lohmaier
Hi Zhen, *, On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 4:47 PM, Zhen Anddavid zhenandda...@gmail.com wrote: I'm trying to build the LibreOffice 4.3.0.0 source on Windows 7 and Visual Studio 2012. But while building, I encountered the error. The error follows as below. [build PAT] openssl assertion ap = end

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Make error messages related to formulas easier to understand

2014-07-16 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Make error messages related to formulas easier to understand

2014-07-02 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 Jorendc jore...@libreoffice.org changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|EDITING: Enhancement: Make |EDITING: Make error

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] New: EDITING: Enhancement: Make error messages related to formulas easier to understand

2014-05-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 Priority: medium Bug ID: 79397 Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Summary: EDITING: Enhancement: Make error messages related to formulas easier to understand

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 79397] EDITING: Enhancement: Make error messages related to formulas easier to understand

2014-05-29 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79397 bugquestcon...@online.de changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are

Re: Make error for barcode extension

2013-12-19 Thread Marina Latini
...@studiostorti.com, libreoffice@lists.freedesktop.org Inviato: Giovedì, 19 dicembre 2013 7:53:38 Oggetto: Re: Make error for barcode extension On 2013-12-18 14:40, Marina Latini wrote: Risoluzione di ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)... 91.208.36.36 Connessione a ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)|91.208.36.36|:80... fallito

Make error for barcode extension

2013-12-18 Thread Marina Latini
Hi all, I've got a make error while trying to build from git source with the option --enable-ext-barcode. here the output: -- cd libreoffice/external/tarballs/tmp wget --progress=dot:mega -Q 0 -P . -l 0 -nd -nH -N http://ooo.itc.hu/oxygenoffice/download/libreoffice

Re: Make error for barcode extension

2013-12-18 Thread Noel Grandin
On 2013-12-18 14:40, Marina Latini wrote: Risoluzione di ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)... 91.208.36.36 Connessione a ooo.itc.hu (ooo.itc.hu)|91.208.36.36|:80... fallito: Connessione rifiutata. That looks like an internet connectivity problem. Either your proxy stuff is not configured correctly, or

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68982] make error no rule to create target svx/source/dialog/srchdlg.hrc required by workdir/unxlngx6

2013-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68982 Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED -- You are

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68982] make error no rule to create target svx/source/dialog/srchdlg.hrc required by workdir/unxlngx6

2013-11-21 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68982 Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 68982] New: make error no rule to create target svx/source/dialog/srchdlg.hrc required by workdir/unxlngx6

2013-09-05 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=68982 Priority: medium Bug ID: 68982 Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Summary: make error no rule to create target svx/source/dialog/srchdlg.hrc required

make error

2013-03-20 Thread Winfried Donkers
I upgraded my machine to openSUSE 12.3, did a ./g pull --rebase and ran make dev-install, resulting in the following error: […] [build CXX] codemaker/source/commonjava/commonjava.cxx [build LNK] StaticLibrary/libcodemaker_java.a [build CXX] codemaker/source/javamaker/classfile.cxx [build CXX]

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/03/13 11:54, Winfried Donkers wrote: I upgraded my machine to openSUSE 12.3, did a ./g pull --rebase and ran make dev-install, resulting in the following error: [build JCS] Jar/ridl javac: error: unrecognized command line option ‘-source’ javac: error: 1.5: Bestand of map

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread d . ostrovsky
Quoting Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com: that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target parameters. [...] that is not odd at all: http://linux.die.net/man/1/gcj the arguments are different there -fsource -ftarget and because it is not the first time someone fails into

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/03/13 12:22, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: Quoting Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com: that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target parameters. [...] that is not odd at all: http://linux.die.net/man/1/gcj the arguments are different there -fsource -ftarget

RE: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Winfried Donkers
Hi Michael, that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target parameters. can you try installing OpenJDK instead? I have java-1_6_0-openjdk installed. I also trried with java-1_7_0-openjdk, but that had the same result, so I switched backup to 1_6. Should I remove

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Michael Stahl
On 20/03/13 12:33, Winfried Donkers wrote: Hi Michael, that is very odd, your javac does not understand -source and -target parameters. can you try installing OpenJDK instead? I have java-1_6_0-openjdk installed. I also trried with java-1_7_0-openjdk, but that had the same result, so

RE: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Winfried Donkers
Hi Michael, try removing gcj instead. I did; autogen.sh went fine, make is now running. Thank you for your advise, I will report when it doesn't help in the end :) Winfried ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:26:35PM +0100, Michael Stahl wrote: But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of bytecode anyway? AFAIK the reason for that is called Debian GNU/kFreeBSD, which does not have a Java 1.6 implementation available (otherwise it would be 1.6

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:22:59PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of bytecode anyway? Wven when we didn't, you need to use =1.6 (if you built with java7) which would still keep the need for -target so this is (at least half) a no-op

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread d . ostrovsky
Quoting Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:22:59PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of bytecode anyway? Wven when we didn't, you need to use =1.6 (if you built with java7) Which bring me to the question

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Miklos Vajna
On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:37:45PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: Which bring me to the question why? UNO java bridge doesn't support 1.7? Generic Linux builds are created on RHEL5, that only has openjdk6. Likewise, Android only supports 1.6 as well. signature.asc Description: Digital

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Rene Engelhard
Hi, On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 03:37:45PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: Quoting Rene Engelhard r...@debian.org: On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 12:22:59PM +0100, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: But why do we still stick to 1.5 source and target version of bytecode anyway? Wven when we didn't, you

Re: make error

2013-03-20 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 03/20/2013 03:37 PM, d.ostrov...@idaia.de wrote: But then still what is here the rule and what is here an exception? The rule is we still must stick to -target 1.6. And the exception is that one distro can only handle -source 1.5 -target 1.5 for now. So sensible default would be to only have

[PATCH] Change in core[feature/killsdf]: Make error message clearer in localize

2012-09-30 Thread via Code Review
Hi, I have submitted a patch for review: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/730 To pull it, you can do: git pull ssh://gerrit.libreoffice.org:29418/core refs/changes/30/730/1 Make error message clearer in localize which is written out when one of executables writes out invalid sdf line

[PUSHED] Change in core[feature/killsdf]: Make error message clearer in localize

2012-09-30 Thread Andras Timar (via Code Review)
Hi, Thank you for your patch! :-) It has been merged to LibreOffice. If you are interested in details, please visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/730 Approvals: Andras Timar: Verified; Looks good to me, approved -- To view, visit https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/730 To unsubscribe,

Re: [Libreoffice] make error: Fetching dependencies for module l10n from solver... failed

2011-07-16 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Jul 15, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) vuh...@ki-ei.com wrote: (2011/07/16 7:46), Norbert Thiebaud wrote: 2011/7/15 Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) vuh...@ki-ei.com: Hello all, I had followed the build instruction[1] and setup my environment for a few weeks ago. As I thought the

Re: [Libreoffice] make error: Fetching dependencies for module l10n from solver... failed

2011-07-16 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
(2011/07/16 15:26), Norbert Thiebaud wrote: ./g pull -r Works like a charm. My bad :) -- Nguyen Vu Hung (Nguyyễn Vũ Hưng) LibreOffice, Vietnamese Translation Team. ___ LibreOffice mailing list LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org

Re: [Libreoffice] make error: Fetching dependencies for module l10n from solver... failed

2011-07-16 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
(2011/07/16 18:30), Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi) wrote: (2011/07/16 15:26), Norbert Thiebaud wrote: ./g pull -r Works like a charm. My bad :) CentOS 5.6 latest update # Should I stick to 3.4 branch? cd bootstrap ./g pull -r make And I got the following error: -- Error start ---

[Libreoffice] make error: Fetching dependencies for module l10n from solver... failed

2011-07-15 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
Hello all, I had followed the build instruction[1] and setup my environment for a few weeks ago. As I thought the code was a little out of date, so I have tried to pull the latest code and make, but it seems that wget could not wget a dependency. I am not sure what it is. Any help is

Re: [Libreoffice] make error: Fetching dependencies for module l10n from solver... failed

2011-07-15 Thread Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)
(2011/07/16 7:46), Norbert Thiebaud wrote: 2011/7/15 Nguyen Vu Hung (KiEi)vuh...@ki-ei.com: Hello all, I had followed the build instruction[1] and setup my environment for a few weeks ago. As I thought the code was a little out of date, so I have tried to pull the latest code and make, but it