Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Michael Stahl
On 24.02.2017 16:45, Bryan Quigley wrote: > I'm going to look at adding the SHA256SUM for all the files in > download.lst. It looks like we can add them without breaking > anything. Then we can test out how we want to switch or if we need to > support both for a bit (platform dependent?).

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:45 AM, Bryan Quigley wrote: > I'm going to look at adding the SHA256SUM for all the files in > download.lst. It looks like we can add them without breaking > anything. Then we can test out how we want to switch or if we need to > support

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Bryan Quigley
I'm going to look at adding the SHA256SUM for all the files in download.lst. It looks like we can add them without breaking anything. Then we can test out how we want to switch or if we need to support both for a bit (platform dependent?). Thoughts? Bryan (Of course, technically my SHA256SUMs

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 9:25 AM, Stephan Bergmann wrote: > On 02/24/2017 03:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: >> >> The situation with checksum of 'external' files is much worse that you >> thought. >> They are actually checked with md5. >> That being said they are not truly

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Stephan Bergmann
On 02/24/2017 03:47 PM, Norbert Thiebaud wrote: The situation with checksum of 'external' files is much worse that you thought. They are actually checked with md5. That being said they are not truly external, since they are hosted on the project infrastructure ...but downloaded via plain HTTP

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 8:03 AM, Necdet Yücel wrote: > 2017-02-24 16:42 GMT+03:00 Norbert Thiebaud : >> >> On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Necdet Yücel >> wrote: >> > Hi, >> > >> > in configure script file integrity is checked

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Necdet Yücel
2017-02-24 16:42 GMT+03:00 Norbert Thiebaud : > On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Necdet Yücel > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > in configure script file integrity is checked by using sha1sums. > > You are sure about that ? or you just did a quick git grep

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Fri, Feb 24, 2017 at 5:13 AM, Necdet Yücel wrote: > Hi, > > in configure script file integrity is checked by using sha1sums. You are sure about that ? or you just did a quick git grep sha1sum and went from there ? Norbert

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-24 Thread Necdet Yücel
Hi, in configure script file integrity is checked by using sha1sums. --- Necdet Yücel http://about.me/nyucel 2017-02-24 4:18 GMT+03:00 Norbert Thiebaud : > On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Necdet Yücel > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Since SHA1 has been

Re: sha1sum problem

2017-02-23 Thread Norbert Thiebaud
On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 10:54 AM, Necdet Yücel wrote: > Hi, > > Since SHA1 has been broken in practice [1] maybe we should consider to move > to safer alteratives, such as SHA-256. What are you talking about ? (yes I read the news this morning too, but what concretely are

sha1sum problem

2017-02-23 Thread Necdet Yücel
Hi, Since SHA1 has been broken in practice [1] maybe we should consider to move to safer alteratives, such as SHA-256. Best regards [1] http://shattered.it/ --- Necdet Yücel http://about.me/nyucel ___ LibreOffice mailing list