Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:08:16PM +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
No, I don't think we want install sets without en-US. But we need to
make sure that we don't have runtime problems when a localized file is
missing. Now there is the en-US copy, but after your proposed patch
there will be
Hi,
this review: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/3908 drops (now unneeded)
DEFAULT_TO_ENGLISH_FOR_PACKING and the installer code that handles it.
D.
___
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:08:16PM +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:35 PM, David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
No, I don't think we want install sets without en-US. But we need to
make sure that we don't have runtime problems when a localized file is
missing.
Hi,
On Fri, May 10, 2013 at 03:25:27PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 07, 2013 at 07:08:16PM +0200, Andras Timar wrote:
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:35 PM, David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
No, I don't think we want install sets without en-US. But we need to
make
On Tue, 2013-05-07 at 17:35 +0200, David Tardon wrote:
The question is: Do we see any reason to create install. sets that do
not contain en-US, as explained in i#45118 (in that case there are
several things that need to be fixed)? If not, we can just drop
DEFAULT_TO_ENGLISH_FOR_PACKING and the
Hi all,
the installer uses a special variable DEFAULT_TO_ENGLISH_FOR_PACKING to
substitute en-US files if there are no files for native language (this
is used for the stuff from extras and help). The reasoning why it is
needed is in https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=45118 (Rene
had
Hi,
On Tue, May 7, 2013 at 5:35 PM, David Tardon dtar...@redhat.com wrote:
Hi all,
the installer uses a special variable DEFAULT_TO_ENGLISH_FOR_PACKING to
substitute en-US files if there are no files for native language (this
is used for the stuff from extras and help). The reasoning why it
