On Tue, Apr 03, 2012 at 06:00:27AM +0200, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Just curious: what's the big difference between rtl::OUString and std::string
?
The most important is that rtl::OUString is part of the public API.
Best,
Bjoern
___
LibreOffice mailing
On Tuesday 03 of April 2012, Enrico Weigelt wrote:
Hi,
I don't want to spoil the fun much for you :) , but I expect the
number of
string allocations to go down when RTL_CONSTASCII_* stops being used
in favor
of string literals, and further down after whenever I get to
implementing
Just curious: what's the big difference between rtl::OUString and
std::string ?
http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2012-March/028485.html
(and
click the next message link a couple of times).
Okay. Do situations where std::string doesnt suffice happen that often,
that we
Okay. Do situations where std::string doesnt suffice happen that often,
that we need to OUString virtually everywhere ?
You aren't telling us anything we don't know already. Sure, stopping
using UTF-16 strings in situations where it is just ASCII anyway that
is handled is one thing we want to
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:21 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
I up-loaded the output of my string debug for a writer start:
And discovered there was a bazillion problems with it, in particular
the handling of OUStrings, having nailed that - it now has some
considerable error due to
On Mon, 2012-04-02 at 16:52 +0200, Noel Grandin wrote:
To make it easier to find culprits, perhaps you could add a feature to
your script ?
Checkout sal/rtl/source/strimp.hxx and instrument the _NEW piece to
your heart's content. Potentially it'd be good to out-line that into a
Hi Michael,
On Monday, 2012-04-02 15:25:58 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
How we get 81k allocations of a string containing '/' is somewhat
curious ;-)
My first shoot would be configuration paths ...
Eike
--
LibreOffice Calc developer. Number formatter stricken i18n transpositionizer.
On Monday 02 of April 2012, Michael Meeks wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-30 at 15:21 +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
I up-loaded the output of my string debug for a writer start:
And discovered there was a bazillion problems with it, in particular
the handling of OUStrings, having nailed that
Hi,
I don't want to spoil the fun much for you :) , but I expect the
number of
string allocations to go down when RTL_CONSTASCII_* stops being used
in favor
of string literals, and further down after whenever I get to
implementing the
efficient operator+. So you may be profiling a
