https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #22 from Noel Grandin ---
(In reply to Roman Kuznetsov from comment #21)
> Noel has one more patch for this one
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/167791
Sadly my patch did not work out. I believe there is still a lot
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #21 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #20)
> Comparing the opening times on my system, I see ~110s using LO v.7.2.0, and
> ~105s using v.24.2.3. Thanks to the immense Noel's
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #20 from Mike Kaganski ---
Comparing the opening times on my system, I see ~110s using LO v.7.2.0, and
~105s using v.24.2.3. Thanks to the immense Noel's work, I believe that this
regression can be closed now?
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #19 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-24-2":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/4126c6b94e87f7ad2a1aa93d66bbb3edf67ec790
tdf#158556
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #18 from Tex2002ans ---
Fantastic. Thank you so much, Noel.
I can't wait to test the dailies again and see how much faster it got. :)
(According to your notes, looks like it's ~30% the load time compared to a week
ago!)
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #17 from Noel Grandin ---
The root of the remaining problem is how we create and update SwPageDesc. It is
a very heavy object, and when we update it, we create one, then copy it to the
destination document, then delete it.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #16 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/77224aaec6ba89194a404805d7190f88e92fcc9f
tdf#158556 speedup
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #15 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/ab29c857c669bcca3d8eea8a5a9e6ad5eae622d7
tdf#158556 speedup
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #14 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/284d80825ec7cf3c39af91959e4bf3d539b066f4
tdf#158556 speed up
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:24.8.0 |target:24.8.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #12 from Commit Notification
---
Noel Grandin committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/241e2d68664e0e53cf02fe9986462c4a9ecd8d42
tdf#158556 speedup
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Tex2002ans changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Tex2002ans from comment #10)
> On 24.8.0.0alpha0 (2024-01-06 02:53:39), it took:
>
> - 7 mins 49 secs
>
> for first paint... so about 25% better load speed for me.
Heh, it basically
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #10 from Tex2002ans ---
On 24.8.0.0alpha0 (2024-01-06 02:53:39), it took:
- 7 mins 49 secs
for first paint... so about 25% better load speed for me.
- - -
This was the daily I used to test:
Version: 24.8.0.0.alpha0+
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #9 from Commit Notification
---
Mike Kaganski committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-24-2":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/2f9ecce61b0c806a33a9f641e43f4a71ed699fee
tdf#158556:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:24.8.0 |target:24.8.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #8 from Mike Kaganski ---
Note that the merged change doesn't address the other points mentioned in
comment 0: slow navigation after opening. I guess, that that aspect (unrelated
to the opening time regression) needs an own
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #7 from Mike Kaganski ---
So with the change I merged now, it is almost twice as fast opening this bugdoc
on my system. Not as fast as before the change mentioned in comment 3, but that
is likely as far as I can improve it;
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:24.8.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #4)
> For me, moral from this and other regression bugs I see is that changes
> should not be backported, except those for crashes or data loss.
This is debatable :-)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Regression By||Mike Kaganski
--- Comment #4 from Timur
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisected, bisected,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||noelgran...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
Tex2002ans changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||perf
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=158556
--- Comment #1 from Tex2002ans ---
Created attachment 191261
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=191261=edit
The.Century.Dictionary.-.Volume.3[cu31924091890602].docx
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
25 matches
Mail list logo
