https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #15 from ady ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #14)
> Ok, I checked with linux-64-7.6 and the need for two recalcs stopped with
> e7897ce47e415e46eb36687f911a9a4b09ca6b8a
> crashtesting: crash in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
Xisco FaulĂ changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #14 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to ady from comment #13)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #11)
>
> > Plot twist: if you do hard recalc twice with attachment 192832 [details],
> > you get
> >
> > 3
> > 3
> > 4
>
> The
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #13 from ady ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #11)
> Plot twist: if you do hard recalc twice with attachment 192832 [details],
> you get
>
> 3
> 3
> 4
The double hard recalc is only needed in certain versions (e.g.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #12 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #11)
> (In reply to ady from comment #10)
> > (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9)
> > > In bug 159858 I got 7674399aac661eb503d7badc53b9a4d68bd9839d as the exact
> >
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #11 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to ady from comment #10)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9)
> > In bug 159858 I got 7674399aac661eb503d7badc53b9a4d68bd9839d as the exact
> > result.
>
> There must be 2 reasons for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #10 from ady ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #9)
> In bug 159858 I got 7674399aac661eb503d7badc53b9a4d68bd9839d as the exact
> result.
There must be 2 reasons for the bug(s), instead of just 1 unique commit. Please
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lebry...@gmail.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
ady changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||108827
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||bibisected, bisected
Regression By|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #6 from ady ---
tdf#146790 and tdf#151958 seem somewhat related to this, especially when Eike
pushed "Disable binary search on sorted cache for current releases" for the
later.
Quoting Eike:
"
I disabled it at a central
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #5 from ady ---
(In reply to Username from comment #4)
> I moved Range1 and Criteria1 and everything was calculated correctly. Thank
> you!
Just to be clear, that does not solve the bug. A bug is still present, since LO
7.4
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
--- Comment #4 from Username ---
I moved Range1 and Criteria1 and everything was calculated correctly. Thank
you!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=159544
ady changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Function COUNTIF empty |Function COUNTIFS empty
16 matches
Mail list logo