[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2017-02-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #12 from Regina Henschel --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #11) > The left right spacing for the "Formula" frame type is set to 114 twips. It > would be simple to change that to 0. Great for an inline formula. But

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #11 from V Stuart Foote --- The left right spacing for the "Formula" frame type is set to 114 twips. It would be simple to change that to 0. Great for an inline formula. But what of when a complex multi-line formula is insert

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #10 from Regina Henschel --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #7) > In this clip of inline OLE formula objects. The right side Wrap for the > Frame -> Formula style has been reduced to 0, and each formulas Spacing -> >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #9 from Regina Henschel --- The current outer margin given by the wrap property of the formula frame style is _always_ wrong. It should always be 0, not only for inline formulas. The defaults have to be changed. I work around

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #8 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Ben from comment #6) > Created attachment 128669 [details] > space differences If you want the glyphs for the operators to match, you'll need to set the text font to match the formula f

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #7 from V Stuart Foote --- Created attachment 128672 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128672&action=edit example with Wrap and Borders In this clip of inline OLE formula objects. The right side Wrap

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #6 from Ben --- Created attachment 128669 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=128669&action=edit space differences -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 --- Comment #5 from Ben --- After the procedure 'right Object->Wrap->Spacing to zero' under comment0 was used for delta t sub 0 in the attached screenshot, it still looks different in terms of spacing compared the spacing in the next regu

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103816] Formula Editor new Style for spacing defaults for inline equations

2016-11-11 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103816 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de