https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||150481
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #34 from خالد حسني ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #33)
> (Either that or we can open a separate bug for the defaults.)
I think a separate bug for the defaults should be ideal, as this is independent
of what
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #33 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(Either that or we can open a separate bug for the defaults.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #32 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to خالد حسني from comment #31)
> I think we have enough bundled Arabic fonts, and I don’t think we need to
> change the default fonts if no one is complaining.
This was left open because
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
خالد حسني changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #30 from aman...@outlook.com ---
Any progress on this?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Bug 113532 depends on bug 115226, which changed state.
Bug 115226 Summary: Update bundled Amiri to 0.111
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=115226
What|Removed |Added
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #29 from Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired) ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #28)
> I guess we can close this as resolved fixed now?
The reordering of default fonts still is pending, see comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #28 from Eike Rathke ---
I guess we can close this as resolved fixed now?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|115226 |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Volga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||115226
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.1.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #27 from Commit Notification
---
Yousuf Philips committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-0-0":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #26 from Commit Notification
---
Yousuf Philips committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-6-0":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:6.1.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #25 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Created attachment 138582
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138582=edit
various heading and text body combinations
In writer, we have to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #24 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Created attachment 138580
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138580=edit
default sans font selection
No that the bundled arabic fonts are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #23 from Commit Notification
---
Yousuf Philips committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #22 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Created attachment 138577
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=138577=edit
arabic monospace fonts
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #21)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #21 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #20)
> but anyway, i've removed it from the patch.
I'd say don't remove it until there's an actual bug (is there?) - but it's
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #20 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #19)
> By using an abandoned font with not much user base, we are on our own when
> bugs are found in the font (i.e. similar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #19 from Khaled Hosny ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #18)
> (In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #17)
> > I don’t recommend including Thabit, it is an abandoned font.
>
> Though
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #18 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #17)
> I don’t recommend including Thabit, it is an abandoned font.
Though it is no longer updated, it is available in the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #17 from Khaled Hosny ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #16)
> Patch is in - https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/46624/
>
> The archives can be found here
>
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #16 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Patch is in - https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/46624/
The archives can be found here
https://drive.google.com/open?id=1pvCiOthbbpjnPyuh9dyHubAkBSbXLaqa
I pulled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #15 from Khaled Hosny ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #12)
> Created attachment 137962 [details]
> DecoType Naskh and Apple Arabic Default
Apple Arabic fonts are AAT not OpenType
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #14 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
So i'll be tackling the issue of what we should bundle in this comment.
Windows and Mac both provide a calligraphy-styled Naskh font (Arabic
Typesetting, DecoType
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #13 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Created attachment 137972
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=137972=edit
open source arabic fonts grouped based on look/style
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #12 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Created attachment 137962
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=137962=edit
DecoType Naskh and Apple Arabic Default
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #11 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Created attachment 137961
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=137961=edit
windows arabic fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #137957|mac OS X hebrew fonts
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #10 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Created attachment 137957
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=137957=edit
mac OS X hebrew fonts
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #9 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #8)
> That is a rather small sample size, though. There are only 129 votes in that
> poll.
The poll sample size would be small as
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #8 from Khaled Hosny ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #7)
> Ran a poll on twitter[1] and here are the results from the 129 votes for
> "Which open source font should be used as the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #7 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Ran a poll on twitter[1] and here are the results from the 129 votes for "Which
open source font should be used as the default Arabic font for documents?"
Amiri (44%)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #6 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #5)
> IANAL, but there is no single GPL license, there is version 1, 2 or 3 and
> they are not compatible so you need to know the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #5 from Khaled Hosny ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #4)
> (In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #3)
> > The fonts were not accompanied by a LICENSE file, only a copyright notice
> >
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #4 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
(In reply to Khaled Hosny from comment #3)
> No link. Arabeyes do not design these fonts (I know be cause I used to
> maintain them at some point) and the person who
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #3 from Khaled Hosny ---
(In reply to Yousuf Philips (jay) from comment #2)
> Khaled: For Arabeyes fonts, is there some link you can provide that has more
> details of what the fuzzy legal status
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #2 from Yousuf Philips (jay) ---
Khaled: For Arabeyes fonts, is there some link you can provide that has more
details of what the fuzzy legal status relates to? For KACST fonts, not sure
why them not
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
--- Comment #1 from Khaled Hosny ---
I’d stay away from Arabeyes fonts as their legal status is fuzzy. The KACST
fonts should be OK if KACST is still distributing them, but they don’t and
there exact license terms
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113532
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
48 matches
Mail list logo