https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
--- Comment #21 from jan.procha...@archimetes.com ---
(In reply to QA Administrators from comment #20)
> Dear jan.prochaska,
>
> To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
> LibreOffice QA is asking bug
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
--- Comment #20 from QA Administrators ---
Dear jan.prochaska,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
--- Comment #19 from QA Administrators ---
** Please read this message in its entirety before responding **
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
--- Comment #18 from V Stuart Foote ---
Issue here remains, we seem to be mishandling the /P document security.
As for bug 103807 if we choose to not implement the arbitrary privacy settings
of later PDF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
V Stuart Foote changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
--- Comment #16 from Buovjaga ---
Hmm, after reading bug 103807, I don't think it makes sense to implement what
this report calls for. The point would be having it read-only, but in bug
103807 it was decided there
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113780
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW