https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
--- Comment #9 from Xisco Faulí ---
Well, not everything is white or black.
Maybe a more info link as suggested by Heiko in comment 3 could work here...
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
--- Comment #8 from Timur ---
PS even status is WRONG. Request is clear and not INVALID but WONTFIX.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
--- Comment #7 from Timur ---
I strongly disagree with not functional software and not correct logic and not
helpful help.
Why do you think that user will come to Options to learn about recalculation?
There are a number of bugs where
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
--- Comment #5 from Olivier Hallot ---
IMHO, no need for help buttons in confirmation dialogs. The topic is already
covered in Help pages when opening Help from Tools- Options - LibreOffice Calc
- Formula, which is the dialog that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||olivier.hallot@documentfoun
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
--- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze ---
The point is that confirmation means yes or no and it's unclear what happens
when pressing "Help" (that's also why those dialogs typically don't have an x
on top right). Ideally, the question is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
--- Comment #2 from Timur ---
I don't know. But we should have it where deemed useful.
Where choice is obvious and help is not needed ("do you want to overwrite?") is
different from where it's not and where the concept itself may be
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119077
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
--- Comment #1 from