https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119309
Miklos Vajna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|ASSIGNED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119309
--- Comment #6 from Pierrick Vandenbroucke
---
Hi,
The second point is much more important (missing type attribute). If DSS (and
probably other tools) doesn't validate your files, that will be the main cause.
I invite you to test the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119309
--- Comment #5 from Miklos Vajna ---
Hi,
No problem if you don't warn on that, my worry is if you reject a signature
because it covers the mimetype file.
That would be unfortunate, as reducing the data we sign is not great, but
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119309
--- Comment #4 from Pierrick Vandenbroucke
---
Hello,
I'll keep you informed about the files covering. IMO, if we refer to ETSI EN
319 162-1 ch 4.4.3.3, the META-INF/manifest.xml could be covered but the
mimetype file is not in the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119309
Miklos Vajna changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
Ever confirmed|0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119309
--- Comment #2 from Andrii Melashchenko ---
FYI online app is not correct yet, according to DSS app comment
(https://ec.europa.eu/cefdigital/tracker/browse/DSS-1473 )
" I'll need to adapt DSS to fix the "signatures cover the mimetype
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119309
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr,
