https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #45 from QA Administrators ---
Dear b.,
Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding.
Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and
a lack of information which is needed in order to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #44 from QA Administrators ---
Dear b.,
This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least
6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as
possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #42 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
> 2. @matthew found something reproducible triggering miscalculations by being
> dependent on the actual view when distinct actions are performed? which
> potentially is the! reason why we
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #41 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #40)
> (In reply to matthewnote from comment #39)
> If you gonna attempt to reproduce.. you might try run a regular build with a
> debugger attached
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #40 from Telesto ---
(In reply to matthewnote from comment #39)
If you gonna attempt to reproduce.. you might try run a regular build with a
debugger attached (windbg). Might throw some warning
If want to deeper, you might
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
b. changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #39 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
Hello Telesto, "b"
Thanks to progress on Bug 86321 and VLB's file, it's possible to provide a
"reproduceable sporadic fail". I will contribute it (with on screen video),
which might take
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #38 from VLB ---
I also have a private sheet with many formulas, where I do not recalculate
certain specific fields correctly. This is very difficult to reproduce because
it does not always occur.
As soon as I do
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #37 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #36 from b. ---
see
https://ask.libreoffice.org/en/question/285230/how-does-calc-load-file-into-memory-and-prepare-the-calculation-to-be-presented/
about similar observations and suspecting 'in' or 'out' contributing to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #35 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
> Related to steps to reproduce. I sometimes use a screen recorder (and
> shortcut OSD). Let it simply run while you're working. So there is a way to
> look back in time. Even slow down.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #34 from b. ---
@matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk, like your approach, have respect for your background
and would really! really! really! like people like you to have more influence
on the quality of LO, esp. calc, pls. stay with us
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #33 from Telesto ---
You may continue here.. but devs like 'really' concrete issues.
(In reply to matthewnote from comment #31)
> > * The problem is hard to reproduce. That's unfortunate, but Calc is a
> > complex piece of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #32 from Telesto ---
Throwing out the developers for now.. until something reproducible appears..
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #31 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
> * The problem is hard to reproduce. That's unfortunate, but Calc is a
> complex piece of software
Careful. We know that, appreciate it and deploy it with much enthusiasm.
> I'm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
Luboš Luňák changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #30 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #29 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
@b and @Telesto. Hi. I know Eike prefers zero prose. Yet I think to clarify.
"Patchwork". I used the word in the meaning visual collage of the view area
seen by users. Did not intend to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #28 from b. ---
whowww!, a real blow up of thoughts and work on this problem :-) ... and hope
...
sorry, at this moment i don't have time to check every step by myself, thus
pls. be indulgent if i'm off the track with any
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #27 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Michael Meeks from comment #26)
> It is safe to say that if a broken file produced by an old version of calc
> is required to reproduce the problem, then it's not that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #26 from Michael Meeks ---
It is safe to say that if a broken file produced by an old version of calc is
required to reproduce the problem, then it's not that interesting to us.
Then again - if we are confident that older
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #25 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
>
> FWIW: I'm having some experience with tracking those bugs (mostly by
> pointers of b.)
>
> However this one is hard to follow (and bit of mess). Obviously because
> because being a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #24 from Telesto ---
(In reply to matthewnote from comment #23)
> If autocalculate doesn't (in fact) exist; if it's just a fancy name for
> hundreds of bugfixes since 2007 all bolted together then I'll change my
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #23 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Luboš Luňák from comment #22)
> This is long, but after reading this it seems to me that it can be
> summarized as follows: If one uses old LO version and saves incorrect
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #22 from Luboš Luňák ---
This is long, but after reading this it seems to me that it can be summarized
as follows: If one uses old LO version and saves incorrect values, current LO
uses those values and does not recalculate
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #21 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
Hi Michael. Thank you for the encouragement. My text was too long. Briefly.
attachment 168720 is offered because it's without iterations (none). Steps 1
to 11 are reproduceable every
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l.lu...@collabora.com,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #19 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
It's known that many reasons can cause a zero result in a cell, often to do
with formatting, shared formulae, often solved by the calcext for Libreoffice.
Bugs due to copy and paste
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #18 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
I've found Eike's list for reading. So I'll try to learn from this:
https://erack.de/bookmarks/O.html#OOo
specifically the section "the olde stuff".
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #17 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
Pardon, excuse me: attachment 168720 version used is "parallel installed" (not
AppImage)
Version: 5.4.7.2
Build ID: c838ef25c16710f8838b1faec480ebba495259d0
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.15;
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #16 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
Additional note.
If the steps to reproduce are done after viewing a sheet (just view, click once
without doing anything) that sheet (oilolive or oilolive_2) will also have all
columns
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #14 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to b. from comment #13)
> @Buovjaga said there is a logger for
> linux? ...
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/UITests#Tools_for_writing_a_test
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #13 from b. ---
trying sometimes, will report if i get a reproducer, catched one with an old
ver. (6.1.6.3), but no repro from saved files,
description in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125052#c19
and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #12 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Michael Meeks from comment #11)
> If there is an issue that is reproducible, and is not related to iteration -
> then I'm really interested in it =) is this one ?
b. is claiming there
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #11 from Michael Meeks ---
If there is an issue that is reproducible, and is not related to iteration -
then I'm really interested in it =) is this one ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #10 from Telesto ---
(In reply to b. from comment #9)
I still hoping Michael being able be of some assistance here. He does care
about this topic and belongs to they higher echelons of the project. However
major problem is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
--- Comment #9 from b. ---
@Telesto,
thanks for your understanding words,
no, the original report shouldn't be closed, as said there: 'the error happens
in rare cases and in large sheets',
thus two or three 'non-repros' are only an
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||michael.me...@collabora.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125320
b. changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|combination of |- sporadic fail! -
42 matches
Mail list logo
