[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126159] Arguments' names of AGGREGATE function can be simpler

2020-08-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126159 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||108827

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126159] Arguments' names of AGGREGATE function can be simpler

2020-02-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126159 --- Comment #3 from So --- (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #2) > for the > LARGE(), SMALL(), ... functions every second argument is a number or array > (or reference of course) that determines the operation of the function on > the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126159] Arguments' names of AGGREGATE function can be simpler

2019-11-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126159 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126159] Arguments' names of AGGREGATE function can be simpler

2019-11-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126159 Eike Rathke changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126159] Arguments' names of AGGREGATE function can be simpler

2019-11-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126159 Xisco FaulĂ­ changed: What|Removed |Added CC||er...@redhat.com,

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126159] Arguments' names of AGGREGATE function can be simpler

2019-07-13 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126159 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You