[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129437] [PYUNO] "setPropertyValue" method does not accept particular Enum value

2020-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129437 --- Comment #5 from jeanmarczam...@gmail.com --- > Exactly what corresponding Basic and Java code does not exhibit this issue? I was half wrong. If this basic code rases no error: Sub any_enum_test(): button_model =

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129437] [PYUNO] "setPropertyValue" method does not accept particular Enum value

2020-01-06 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129437 --- Comment #4 from Stephan Bergmann --- (In reply to jeanmarczambon from comment #3) > But I'm not sure at all why this report is marked as "NOTABUG", while it > obviously concerns a defect: the error is not the expected behaviour, and

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129437] [PYUNO] "setPropertyValue" method does not accept particular Enum value

2019-12-30 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129437 --- Comment #3 from jeanmarczam...@gmail.com --- Thanks both of you for your comments. I understand (I think) why the definition of the interface can't be changed. But I'm not sure at all why this report is marked as "NOTABUG", while it

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129437] [PYUNO] "setPropertyValue" method does not accept particular Enum value

2019-12-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129437 Stephan Bergmann changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129437] [PYUNO] "setPropertyValue" method does not accept particular Enum value

2019-12-17 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129437 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sberg...@redhat.com,