https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Patrick Luby changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||plub...@neooffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Sierk Bornemann changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||42082
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
steve changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||l...@disr.it
Summary|[MacOS]
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
--- Comment #11 from Miklos Vajna ---
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/libreoffice/2020-February/084440.html
discussed today in the ESC call. If there is more input needed, probably best
to discuss it async on the dev list.
--
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
--- Comment #10 from Tor Lillqvist ---
I don't think this issue is about low-level rendering as such, but about
fitting the whole application plumbing into the Cocoa document architecture,
NSDocument etc. See
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
--- Comment #9 from Miklos Vajna ---
Sure, we can discuss this in 3 days.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Michael Meeks changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||caol...@redhat.com,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
--- Comment #6 from Thorsten Wagner ---
APIs of SWIFT and Objective+C++ are very similar/exchangable. I don't know if
SWIFT is really the future. I fact both can be used. To integrate with LO code
Objective-C++ should be the way to go
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||thorsten.wagne...@gmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
--- Comment #4 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Without any concrete suggestions there is little to say. But in general, yeah,
I am sure there is lots that could be done.
Using Objective-C++ makes it trivial to interface with cross-platform
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
--- Comment #2 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #1)
> Shouldn't we be looking at Swift instead of Objective-C ?
It seems Cocoa framework is compatible with both. Now, if Swift is the future,
I suppose that
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130453
--- Comment #1 from Alex Thurgood ---
Shouldn't we be looking at Swift instead of Objective-C ?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs
17 matches
Mail list logo
