https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #20 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #19)
> Don't see how the design group can help here. According comment 12 it's a
> bunch of issues and you discuss several solutions. Sounds as splitting the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||108741
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisectRequest |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #18 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
I've opened bug 131830 for the missing context menu entry mentioned by Regina.
Won't link it, as it's not related to this bug.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #17 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #12)
[info about ODF / SVG representation]
I'm not sure, the external representation matters for this bug. But yup - a
complex path of different
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #16 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #15)
> Created attachment 159274 [details]
> Close and open polygon from the context menu
>
> (In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #14)
> >
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #15 from Regina Henschel ---
Created attachment 159274
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=159274=edit
Close and open polygon from the context menu
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #14)
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #14 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #13)
> (In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #11)
>
> > There is also the functionality "Close object" in the context menu.
> > Interestingly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #13 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Jan-Marek Glogowski from comment #11)
> There is also the functionality "Close object" in the context menu.
> Interestingly I couldn't find a way to "Open" a closed object,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Regina Henschel changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #11 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
FWIW I'm currently not planning to fix this. My only suggestion w.r.t. UX
tooling is to split "polygon" and "polyline" functionality. So the first will
always close the polygon and the latter
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #10 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
Hi Armin,
(In reply to Armin Le Grand from comment #5)
> - What is the correct handling here from your POV?
> AFAIK as it was before changes were made in that area. Obviously that
> touched
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #9 from Heiko Tietze ---
Would have expected that polyPolygon has at least one common point. But there
is no such statement on MSDN or AOO wiki and this picture (on the bottom) shows
a use case:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #8 from Armin Le Grand ---
Just had another idea - maybe someone tried to 'fix' this for the usage in
Impress and the animation effects move-along-path. In that scaenario closing
and even starting new at an existing point
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #7 from Armin Le Grand ---
2nd note: the polygons in a PolyPolygon are completely independent. They do not
need to have common real existing points where they intersect (that is the
complicated part in the polygon clipping
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #6 from Armin Le Grand ---
Upps - sorry, was too fast. For the 'u' shape better take something with a
at-leat two-stroke topology - 'E' or 'F' - where you have to paint two strokes.
Using CTRL+ALT there currently closes the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #5 from Armin Le Grand ---
Hi Jan,
- What is the correct handling here from your POV?
AFAIK as it was before changes were made in that area. Obviously that touched
stuff which was not on the radar - what always can happen,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #4 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
(In reply to Armin Le Grand from comment #3)
[A lot more stuff about various actions with polygon, which I didn't test]
> - ctrl-click: close current poly, start new one (polyPoly topology)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #3 from Armin Le Grand ---
Hi Guys,
I was inactive some time in-between, but I would have never seen a reason to
change behavior. That interactive poly-creation is complicated anyways. Just
want to make sure you have the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
--- Comment #2 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #1)
> Have you bibisected who to blame/ask for the reason of these changes?
No. IMHO the 7.0 behavior is the most correct. The 5.4.7 with closing the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131758
Jan-Marek Glogowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||armin.le.gr...@me.com,
24 matches
Mail list logo
