https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|VERIFIED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #59 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Horst Schirmeier from comment #57)
> Tested with
> libreoffice-7-1~2021-01-21_04.37.55_LibreOfficeDev_7.1.1.0.0_Linux_x86-
> 64_deb.tar.gz , I don't observe the issue anymore. Thank you!
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #58 from Horst Schirmeier ---
... indeed. LO 7.1.0.2 prerelease works way better (and also doesn't have the
bug anymore).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #57 from Horst Schirmeier ---
Tested with
libreoffice-7-1~2021-01-21_04.37.55_LibreOfficeDev_7.1.1.0.0_Linux_x86-64_deb.tar.gz
, I don't observe the issue anymore. Thank you!
(But LO Impress feels slower than ever. Is this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #56 from Commit Notification
---
Gülşah Köse committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-0":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/edeebddfacdb6e77a4f21a96bc7a6e96851434a5
tdf#136278
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:7.2.0 target:7.1.0.2 |target:7.2.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #55 from Commit Notification
---
Gülşah Köse committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "libreoffice-7-1":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/09c4b4dbf7bb1dc4821455b0e0f549954f1c4002
tdf#136278
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:7.2.0|target:7.2.0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #54 from Gülşah Köse ---
@Pierre On the way
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #53 from Pierre C ---
tested this morning with LO 7.2 dev
Version: 7.2.0.0.alpha0+ (x64)
Build ID: 96bafa464ebdbce3ef04bec9beae5e745bb37794
CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19042; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Gülşah Köse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #52 from Commit Notification
---
Gülşah Köse committed a patch related to this issue.
It has been pushed to "master":
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/b83c16834792874524019495662b2f23a066611c
tdf#136278 Follow-up
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:7.2.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #51 from Gülşah Köse ---
It will be fixed with https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/108559 Thanks
again
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #50 from Gülşah Köse ---
@Aron a gold medal comes to you from me. I'll fix it in 10 minutes now. Thank
you so much.
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #48)
> Gülşah, Buovjaga, please note that there's another related
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|notBibisectable |
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #49 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #48)
> Gülşah, Buovjaga, please note that there's another related commit in bug
> 131254:
> https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #47 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Gülşah Köse from comment #46)
> @Buovjaga thanks for the confirmation. I've added notBibisectable keyword to
> explain this situation. There shouldn't be magic here. I think bibisect repo
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #48 from Aron Budea ---
Gülşah, Buovjaga, please note that there's another related commit in bug
131254:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=14a0727889699128f02ac0a79bdce0103c89bc01
I don't have a fresh
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #46 from Gülşah Köse ---
@Buovjaga thanks for the confirmation. I've added notBibisectable keyword to
explain this situation. There shouldn't be magic here. I think bibisect repo
has missing commit. Do you know how can we
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Gülşah Köse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||notBibisectable
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #45 from Buovjaga ---
You are right that reverting both of the commits in current master does not
make the newest badness go away (I tested it).
Now I bibisected again more carefully with 7.2 repo, making the full three
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #44 from Gülşah Köse ---
@Buovjaga I reverted my two commits on current master.
commit 5cc188f711a3f2afa13bd69a92240f3a69213c1a (HEAD -> master)
Author: Gülşah Köse
Date: Fri Jan 1 16:29:12 2021 +0300
Revert
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #43 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Gülşah Köse from comment #42)
> I can confirm the bug as described below. This is not a regression caused by
> me. It should be another regression. While bisecting please make sure that
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #42 from Gülşah Köse ---
I can confirm the bug as described below. This is not a regression caused by
me. It should be another regression. While bisecting please make sure that the
bad situation is like as below.
>
> Still
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.4.3.2 release |6.4.0.0.beta1+
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Pierre C changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.4.0.0.beta1+ |6.4.3.2 release
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #40 from Horst Schirmeier ---
Bug #134133 is now marked as "fixed", but this bug still persists -- with
slightly different behavior (tested with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Gülşah Köse changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|DUPLICATE
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #37 from Horst Schirmeier ---
It's been bibisected to the same commit, so I'd guess it's the same bug.
However, the description in bug #134133 seems to only partially describe the
problem; using the left arrow can lead to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #36 from Timur ---
This report is too long and with off-topic so I didn't read.
Could someone confirm that this is different from bug 134133?
Or it's a duplicate with spending of volunteers on talk, bibisect.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #35 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Mark from comment #34)
> As to the fact that I am not paying for the fix: I thought that that
> meant
> I wasn’t in a position to put pressure on anyone. I was surprised that it
> was
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #34 from Mark ---
Let me say that I am fine with it taking over a month to assign this
bug. The reason for my last comment was that I thought it had been put in a
medium level bug graveyard. Gülşah Köse’s comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #33 from Telesto ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #32)
> This is not OK either. You add Xisco to the report while implying the commit
> should be reverted even though Gülşah just said she will look into it. Have
> some
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #32 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #31)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #30)
> > Please do not put this sort of pressure on someone you didn't hire to work
> > on a bug.
>
> Pressure can be relieved
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #30 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Mark from comment #28)
> It has been a month since Roman Kuznetsov told me to be patient. In that
> time I have been watching META- Bug 103610 hoping to see this bug climb to
> the top of
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #29 from Gülşah Köse ---
I'll take it soon. Sorry for the regression.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #28 from Mark ---
It has been a month since Roman Kuznetsov told me to be patient. In that time
I have been watching META- Bug 103610 hoping to see this bug climb to the top
of the list to get assigned. There has been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #26 from Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> ---
(In reply to Mark from comment #25)
> At this point this bug has been multiply reproduced, and it has been
> bibisected. What more needs to be done before it is assigned?
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #25 from Mark ---
At this point this bug has been multiply reproduced, and it has been
bibisected. What more needs to be done before it is assigned?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||103610
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #24 from Pierre C ---
Confirming a bug with LO 7.0.2.1. W10
Using left arrow key should animate back (The last object that has appeared
should be the first to disappear)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||pierre.choffar...@free.fr
--- Comment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #22 from BogdanB ---
Is this bug (https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137212) a
duplicate of this one?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #21 from BogdanB ---
Gulsah Kose, please if you can take a look on this bug. I add you to CC on this
bug.
Bibisected:
https://git.libreoffice.org/core/commit/49e114d3803178f8720620834f97e2ab0962e826
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.3.6.2 release |6.4.0.0.beta1+
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Horst Schirmeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Horst Schirmeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.4.4.1 rc |6.3.6.2 release
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #19 from Horst Schirmeier ---
6.2.8.2 does not exhibit the bug, 6.3.6.2 does. This must have broken
somewhere in-between.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Horst Schirmeier changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ho...@schirmeier.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #17 from Horst Schirmeier ---
I can reproduce the issue with the latest LibreOffice 7.0.1.2 (DEB) from
libreoffice.org, and with Ubuntu 20.04's LibreOffice 6.4.6-0ubuntu0.20.04.1
(with KDE on Xorg). I see this all over the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected
--- Comment #16 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #15 from Mark ---
I tried it. Nothing was shown.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #14 from BogdanB ---
Nothing is shown in my case.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
QA Administrators changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|1 |0
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators ---
[Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #11 from Mark ---
I ran it in flatpak, but the bug was still there. Does that tell us
anything interesting?
Does that mean I should go bother Canonical? System76? The Debian
Project? Does this mean The
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #9 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to BogdanB from comment #8)
> I have Ubuntu 20.04 and the bug.
> Mark has Ubuntu 20.04 and the bug.
> Raal has 18.04 and NO bug.
> Buovjaga, you?
Read comment 4
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #8 from BogdanB ---
I have Ubuntu 20.04 and the bug.
Mark has Ubuntu 20.04 and the bug.
Raal has 18.04 and NO bug.
Buovjaga, you?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
raal changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||r...@post.cz
--- Comment #7 from raal
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #6 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to BogdanB from comment #5)
> Buovjaga, please see the video from youtube from description from minute
> 3:00 since 4:10. The legend is disapearing.
Yes, I saw it disappears at 3:49. Not for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #5 from BogdanB ---
Buovjaga, please see the video from youtube from description from minute 3:00
since 4:10. The legend is disapearing.
Repro in
Version: 7.1.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: 217122387f6e0ef657b8ba85eae082b448901cec
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
Version|6.4.5.2 release |6.4.4.1 rc
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
BogdanB changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||buzea.bog...@libreoffice.or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136278
--- Comment #1 from Mark ---
Created attachment 164862
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=164862=edit
This file manifests the bug. See description.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
72 matches
Mail list logo
