https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #16 from Jim Raykowski ---
(In reply to David from comment #15)
> @Jim
> Awesome work! You deserve the Programmer of the Year award for the second
> year in a row!
>
David, Thanks! TDF "Fantastic People, Fun Project"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisectNotNeeded
--- Comment #14
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||ba...@caesar.elte.hu
Attachment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
Kevin Suo changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||suokunl...@126.com
--- Comment #13
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #12 from Jim Raykowski ---
Hi David, I put the in the patch mentioned in my previous post. It seems to
improve UI response. Testing with gtk3 backend still shows lag for backspace
and delete keys. x11 and qt backends don't
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #11 from Jim Raykowski ---
Here is a patch that should help reduce lag:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/124036
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
Status|UNCONFIRMED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #9 from David ---
FYI: the build failed on gerrit.
I see the case statement now only has 1 'for' loop. But the lag is still
there. The new statement 'rFormatFootnote.GetFootnoteText(*pLayout)' seems to
take as much time
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #8 from Jim Raykowski ---
Here is "optimized" code to fill the footnotes member list. No significant
difference in execution time between the existing code.
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/123433
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #7 from Jim Raykowski ---
(In reply to David from comment #6)
> Specifically, it seems to be the command
> 'rFormatFootnote.GetFootnoteText(*m_pWrtShell->GetLayout())' that is the
> issue.
Yes, that is what I have
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #6 from David ---
Specifically, it seems to be the command
'rFormatFootnote.GetFootnoteText(*m_pWrtShell->GetLayout())' that is the issue.
Maybe I'm mistaken, but from what I can tell, the 'for (SwTextFootnote*
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #5 from David ---
Created attachment 175652
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=175652=edit
replacement document with many footnotes
Created a new sample document without bookmarks.
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #175623|0 |1
is obsolete|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #4 from David ---
The attached document is probably not the best one for this particular bug. It
might actually be demonstrating a different regression than the footnote one.
The lag is removed in my real world documents by
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #3 from David ---
The lag also does not happen with the current development app image dated
2021-08-22, which is before the footnotes category got implemented.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
--- Comment #2 from David ---
(In reply to Jim Raykowski from comment #1)
> I'd say the number of bookmarks in the example file contributes more to the
> cause of lag than the number of footnotes.
The document works fine in 7.2.x. I
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
Jim Raykowski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
--- Comment #1 from
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145043
David changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|bibisected |
--
You are receiving this mail
20 matches
Mail list logo
