https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #18 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #16)
No. The mails get attention; my proposals (e.g.
https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/202109/msg0.html)
resulted in
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #17 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #15)
In that (WF IMO) case, you are telling about *program functionality*, and that
could require a format change; as I mentioned, in this case I'd start
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #16 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #14)
Also...
> Send a mail there: https://lists.oasis-open.org/archives/office-comment/
That mailing list is almost dead: It has had about 5 messages
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #15 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #14)
> However, in this case, you yourself limit it to the format issue. Then
> there's nothing to do in LibreOffice, until it exists in the standard.
But
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|112703 |108237
Referenced Bugs:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #14 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #12)
> The basic "car" is ODF.
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #13)
> This bug is not strictly, or even not basically, about the UI, but the
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #13 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #11)
> and at the same time, I suppose that the *specific* example (paragraph
> spacing) can get a *targeted* improvement. ... until it really becomes
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||112703
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|INVALID |WONTFIX
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski ---
I might have concerns about a specific proposal; I might consider it WONTFIX if
it has a potential of bad usability or other important issues; but I can't
agree with *valid* proposals marked
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |INVALID
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #9 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #8)
> Do you know the "Document Theme" (available in the sidebar if experimental
> features is on)? Not what you are looking for but improvements there make
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #8 from Heiko Tietze ---
Do you know the "Document Theme" (available in the sidebar if experimental
features is on)? Not what you are looking for but improvements there make more
sense.
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #5)
> This is not fair. This is not a real use case
I personally do this with every... say, third multi-page document I write.
Except I have to manually
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #4)
> Programmatically creating styles is not a common use case to me but could be
> done per macro anyway.
I didn't talk about doing anything
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> > Any feature should only be created to implement some specific need, not
> > just because we can.
>
> The specific need is being able to define styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #4 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #3)
> The specific need is being able to define styles progressively as one moves
> down the hierarchy. With my example above: I want to be able to increase or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #1)
> (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> > we can't apply multiple styles at once, see 149271.)
>
> This is not correct ... So the
> feature for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #2 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #1)
> So the feature for that style category exists - but indeed, the UI has much to
> improve (basically, to create from scratch).
And for other style
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
--- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #0)
> we can't apply multiple styles at once, see 149271.)
This is not correct. The bug 149271 has bug 115311 in its "See Also" since its
creation - you
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=152712
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||102946
See Also|
23 matches
Mail list logo
