https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
Commit Notification changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard||target:24.2.0
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #8 from prrv...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #6)
> In fact, you should have amended (see "amend" keyword for git) the first
> patch.
Thanks for all the advice, it worked perfectly.
see:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #7 from Lionel Elie Mamane ---
(In reply to prrvchr from comment #2)
> I don't know if I followed the correct procedure but I already proposed a
> fix so that the SQL type TIME is treated the same as the SQL type TIMESTAMP.
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #6 from Julien Nabet ---
(In reply to prrvchr from comment #5)
> I just submitted a new fix:
>
> https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/155882/1
>
> Apparently it is in conflict with my first update which does not pass the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #5 from prrv...@gmail.com ---
I just submitted a new fix:
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/155882/1
Apparently it is in conflict with my first update which does not pass the
tests. I do not know how to do...
--
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #4 from prrv...@gmail.com ---
I'm just compiling a new fix that supports WITH TIME ZONE SQL type.
It replaces the previous one which also failed the tests.
I'll post the link as soon as it's available.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
Julien Nabet changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||lio...@mamane.lu,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #2 from prrv...@gmail.com ---
I don't know if I followed the correct procedure but I already proposed a fix
so that the SQL type TIME is treated the same as the SQL type TIMESTAMP.
see:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156816
--- Comment #1 from prrv...@gmail.com ---
It seems that Base uses column 6 (CREATE_PARAMS) of the resultset obtained in
response to the XDatabaseMetaData.getTypeInfo()[1] method to determine which
fields should be displayed when declaring
10 matches
Mail list logo
