https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
stragu changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|REOPENED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
m.a.riosv changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||colinz...@icloud.com
--- Comment #56
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||nem...@numbertext.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Timur changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |---
Summary|Allow page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #53 from Regina Henschel ---
This is indeed incomplete in regard to ODF 1.3. Therefor TDF has put it into
the tender
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #52 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Fede from comment #51)
QED. Exactly what was discussed in comment 48.
Please File a bug report, with a keyword "regression", and put this bug to "See
Also" in the new bug.
My own
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #51 from Fede ---
So the solution to this "bug" has been breaking backward compatibility,
disallowing previous behaviour, and making shadows weird if no border.
So borders and shadows refer to the text area, but background
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #50 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Thomas Lendo from comment #49)
No, that's different: you are proposing a new way of doing a desired effect;
I'm taking about not breaking existing documents.
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #49 from Thomas Lendo ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #48)
For such reason I opened bug 122511 'Thicker border line than 9 pt or 5 cm'.
The other See also bugs there are maybe important too.
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #48 from Mike Kaganski ---
FTR: IMO implementing such a high-impact change without a compatibility option
to allow existing documents to stay intact is *wrong*. And now there's a
real-life question about this:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Lenge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Lenge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #46 from Cor Nouws ---
it's not at all uncommon in LibreOffice dev that issues are marked as
resolved with initial solutions, and that follow up issues are created and
resolved for further improvements,
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #45 from mail...@kevinshenk.com ---
Agreed! It's not fixed until it's fixed.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #44 from Lenge ---
I'd like to request to keep this issue open until
(1) a true solution to the initial request becomes available (in terms of
extending the ODF format to support full-page backgrounds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #43 from Yan Pas ---
Created attachment 135628
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=135628=edit
abiword files
I've created both files in abiword. Libreoffice cannot open ODT with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #42 from Regina Henschel ---
Currently the background color is in the "fo" namespace (which belongs to XSL)
and most of the properties refer to CSS. And in CSS you have a box model. That
result e.g.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #41 from Yan Pas ---
Created attachment 135625
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=135625=edit
docx with pink bg
I've tested popular office suites, here is what I've found:
1. MS
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #40 from Regina Henschel ---
Do you have examples from abiword or MS Word in ODF-format?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #37 from Yan Pas ---
Current behavior is a workaround, but not solution. Should I create new ticket?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Lenge changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #33 from Justin L ---
As of LibreOffice 5.4, this issue could potentially be closed - workaround
enabled (see closed bug 41542 mentioned in comment 30).
According to Regina's comment 24 only workarounds will
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Bug 33041 depends on bug 41542, which changed state.
Bug 41542 Summary: FORMATTING: Allow "Spacing to contents" for edges without a
line
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=41542
What|Removed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jl...@mail.com
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #32 from Michael Stahl ---
possibly related OASIS issue:
https://issues.oasis-open.org/browse/OFFICE-3769
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Justin L changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #31 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Lenge from comment #30)
> If I understand correctly, allowing this in LibreOffice would be a suitable
> approach to resolve the full-page background issue, and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #30 from Lenge ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #26)
> The only problem is, that LO disables "Spacing to Contents" in case "Line
> Arrangement" is set to "none" in the tab "Borders", whereas the
>
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #29 from Cor Nouws ---
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #26)
Ah, in current LibreOffice terms : margin 0; border ~0, Spacing to contents = x
(the margin you want for the content).
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #28 from Regina Henschel ---
Created attachment 127160
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=127160=edit
Document with the described workaround
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #27 from Yan Pas ---
Documents created in MS Word with page backgorund and saved in both ODT and
DOCX don't have any white borders. If you open these docs in LO then the
borders become white.
And vice
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #26 from Regina Henschel ---
(In reply to Cor Nouws from comment #25)
> But setting a border in a page style, doesn't offer me a UI to set the
> padding, does it?
The UI is there. "margin" in the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #25 from Cor Nouws ---
Thanks Regina,
(In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #24)
> The solution for LibreOffice can be, to allow to set a padding without
> having a border. border-width="0pt" is handled
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
--- Comment #24 from Regina Henschel ---
The settings are in element in ODF. It allows
the attributes fo:margin and fo:padding. The namespace fo belongs to XSL,e.g
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33041
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Allow page background to|Allow page
37 matches
Mail list logo