[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2021-04-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #33 from Luke --- I agree that while “there are a very rare situations when a precision like this is needed”, it is still a good idea. However, the option to change decimal precision belongs under: Tools > Options >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2020-05-22 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2020-05-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #32 from jsgpb...@gmail.com --- My apologies for not making this a full report. This issue of limited precision has bitten me repeatedly over the years. I frequently do technical drawings for publication, and Draw could be a

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-11-01 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #31 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #27) > UX team should decide which direction to take first UX input was done in c18. Adding a third decimal point might improve the situation but not entirely.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #30 from

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #29 from Gerry Garvey --- So is this a separate issue to original bug 44267? Should bug 128272 be re-opened? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #28 from V Stuart Foote --- (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #27) > This issue sounds more like an enhancement... I believe the UX team should > decide which direction to take first, allowing mm to be used, or accepting >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-31 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |high -- You are receiving this

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #26 from Gerry Garvey --- I'm not sure this report is the same as Bug 128272 "Metric measurements rounded to imperial units". I've attached two screen-shots to illustrate... In screenshot #1, I draw a shape and in the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #25 from Gerry Garvey --- Created attachment 155313 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=155313=edit Bug 128272 screenshot #2 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-25 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #24 from Gerry Garvey --- Created attachment 155312 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=155312=edit Bug 128272 screenshot #1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-10-20 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ggar...@gmx.com --- Comment #23

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2019-03-04 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Luke changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #21 from sergio.calleg...@gmail.com --- As the original reporter of the bug, I'd like to note that while switching to mm is a partial not too uncomfortable solution, switching to pixels, which are generally not a decimal

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #20 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #19) > But in the mean time, being stuck with .01 cm resolution... You can switch to mm or pixels per Tools > Options > Draw > General > Unit of measurement

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 --- Comment #19 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #18) I'm certainly for a more comprehensive solution - but that looks like not-a-small-amount of work; and there would definitely be some arguing about the

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-10-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |tietze.he...@gmail.com

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-10-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|enhancement |normal --- Comment #17 from

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-10-12 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-05-15 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 44267] Two decimal digits are insufficient for specifying object position and size

2018-01-07 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=44267 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Two decimal digits are |Two