https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #36 from Armin Le Grand (CIB) ---
Hi gioni, please read the comments 21 .. 24, these contain all details.
Sorry for your old files, but the error was wrong handling in visualizing, the
negative crops
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #35 from gioni ---
(In reply to Armin Le Grand (CIB) from comment #32)
> @Aron: Yes, it explains how it came to this. Still, that the graphic is now
> cropped, is a correct interpretation of the values
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #34 from gioni ---
(In reply to Aron Budea from comment #31)
> Armin, is comment 27 of any help? I'd assume if some really old OpenOffice
> version (or even a LibreOffice version) could create
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #32 from Armin Le Grand (CIB) ---
@Aron: Yes, it explains how it came to this. Still, that the graphic is now
cropped, is a correct interpretation of the values in the safed file. The error
was in the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #31 from Aron Budea ---
Armin, is comment 27 of any help? I'd assume if some really old OpenOffice
version (or even a LibreOffice version) could create corrupted documents, not
much can be done about it
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Aron Budea changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEEDINFO|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #27 from gioni ---
(In reply to Thorsten Behrens from comment #25)
> (In reply to Armin Le Grand from comment #22)
> > Thus all is working as expected, sorry to tell you that for unknown reasons
> >
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #28 from gioni ---
Created attachment 121728
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=121728=edit
doc created with openoffice in 2007
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #20 from Armin Le Grand ---
Taking a look.
This is strange, when I check the crop values used internally it shows that
const SwCropGrf& rCrop = rSet.GetCropGrf();
in SwGrfNode::GetGraphicAttr gets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #24 from Armin Le Grand ---
To be safe I have removed the patch in question temporarily. The graphic is
painted indeed, but just because the crop validation in
GraphicObject::ImplGetCropParams checks for
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Thorsten Behrens changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #21 from Armin Le Grand ---
Tried to reproduce the problem stating with a new writer doc. Using positive
values works (some and all), using negative for all works, using negative
values for top and
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #22 from Armin Le Grand ---
It happens in the dialog (SvxGrfCropPage) itself; the correct read value (large
nTop) is set at initialization. Then the dialog executes
SvxGrfCropPage::GraphicHasChanged
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #23 from Armin Le Grand ---
Btw: Not sure about the bibisect, checked the changes and before the same crop
definitions were used, so very probable that the display was the same as now
since these values
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #19 from gioni ---
Dear all,
I don't understand correctly your "technical language" about this bug which
affects a lot of my docs. At this moment I cannot upgrade to newest release
than 4.1.6.2. This
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Matthew Francis changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #16 from gioni gianni.nard...@mail.com ---
in 4.4.4 and 5.0.0.2 the problem still persist
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Julien Nabet serval2...@yahoo.fr changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Matthew Francis fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #13 from Jean Spiteri beimaginativeegr...@gmail.com ---
Sorry Robinson but I don't have any Linux OS so can't test it.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #11 from gioni gianni.nard...@mail.com ---
(In reply to Robinson Tryon (qubit) from comment #10)
(In reply to gioni from comment #6)
in the enclosed test file created with 4.1.6.2 are two image triangle.
If open with
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Robinson Tryon (qubit) qu...@runcibility.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
Robinson Tryon (qubit) qu...@runcibility.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|highest
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
--- Comment #10 from Robinson Tryon (qubit) qu...@runcibility.com ---
(In reply to gioni from comment #6)
in the enclosed test file created with 4.1.6.2 are two image triangle.
If open with 4.2.5 you will see only the first.
Right
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75269
gioni gianni.nard...@mail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Cropped image (negative |Cropped image not
27 matches
Mail list logo