https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #39 from Timur ---
I don't see a large change between 6.0 and 6.1+. In my case, bot take around
1:20. So I don't confirm dcdorner.
I see dump:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #38 from rcdor...@gmail.com ---
Just upgraded (04/21/18 11:32am) to 6.0.3.2 64-bit and now nothing works
anymore!
Before it took Up to 20 seconds to open a Single page DOCX File.(!!!)
Now nothing happens anymore and it just
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|104520 |104450
Referenced
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Telesto changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||tele...@surfxs.nl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #35 from iko...@yandex.ru ---
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #33)
(In reply to Justin L from comment #34)
Probably there is some specific to windows port.
For me (LO 4.4.4.3, external built binary package on amd64
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #34 from Justin L jl...@mail.com ---
comment 13 indicates 3 seconds on Word 2013
Word 2003 (with docx extensions added) took approximately 9 seconds to load.
Windows 2003 server, 3GB ram, Core2 Duo, 7 year old computer.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #32 from Gordo gordon1dr...@yahoo.com ---
Created attachment 117436
-- https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=117436action=edit
backtrace
About 2 minutes to open on
Windows Vista 64
Version: 4.4.4.3
Build ID:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #33 from tommy27 ba...@quipo.it ---
(In reply to tommy27 from comment #8)
tested on another (less powerful) Win7x64 machine
4.1.5 and 4.2.1 take almost 7 minutes to load the file...
4.3.0alpha did not load it even after
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #95926|text/plain
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Björn Michaelsen bjoern.michael...@canonical.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Priority|highest |high
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Michael Stahl mst...@redhat.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|target:4.4.0 target:4.3.0.2 |perf filter:ooxml
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #30 from Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com ---
May be related to bug#81214 - its just possible =)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|bibisectrequest |target:4.4.0
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
--- Comment #28 from Joel Madero jmadero@gmail.com ---
Removed bibisectrequest as Michael has already pushed a commit and we don't
even have confirmation that it's a regression. One person says that it was
broken in 4.2, someone else saying
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Jay Philips philip...@hotmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|regression |
--- Comment #29
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76260
Michael Meeks michael.me...@collabora.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
19 matches
Mail list logo