[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 --- Comment #7 from Cor Nouws --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #6) > Please read/comment carefully. Autofill on single cell does increment by 1, > which is wrong in many situations. The proposal was to exchange > ctrl+ and

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 --- Comment #6 from Heiko Tietze --- Please read/comment carefully. Autofill on single cell does increment by 1, which is wrong in many situations. The proposal was to exchange ctrl+ and simple and to make the autofill function on single

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rb.hensc...@t-online.de ---

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added CC|libreoffice-ux-advise@lists |heiko.tietze@documentfounda

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 Cor Nouws changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.0.2.2 release |Inherited From OOo

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- The "zero increment autofill" is very easy to achieve: just copy/paste. While the increment requires a bit more interaction. But the compatibility argument is quite strong. Extending 1 just copies this

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 Justin L changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard||needsUXEval CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||113499

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 V Stuart Foote changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |lowest

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 94669] Calc editing - autofill step-size: suggest no increment if the sequence initially contains only one cell.

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94669 --- Comment #1 from Richard Neill --- One place where this can cause really serious errors is when we have a table such as this Name_a value_a const formula_1 formula_2 formula_3 Name_b value_b