https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Caolán McNamara changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #18 from Gerhard Schaber ---
The fix 89710 that causes this, seems to fix issue 94617. I am fine with
closing the current issue. It would be very useful, if there was some kind of
warning, so that a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #17 from Gerhard Schaber ---
If this is not possible, it would be good to have a kind of warning that says
that password protected macros cannot be used in older versions unless one
enters the password
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #16 from Gerhard Schaber ---
Laurent, please can you have a look to make it more compatible?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #15 from Gerhard Schaber ---
The original intention apparently was to preserve backwards compatibility
according to the check-in comment. Is the current behavior considered a
regression or will it stay
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #14 from Gerhard Schaber ---
Of course, OpenOffice cannot run the macros either (unless they are
unprotected)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #11 from Gerhard Schaber ---
The file from 2015-12-06 is the right one.
I guess a candidate that might cause this could be (see also the attached build
info file of the bisect repository):
commit
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #10 from Gerhard Schaber ---
(In reply to Gerhard Schaber from comment #8)
> Created attachment 121051 [details]
> build info file from the bisect for the first bad version
Please ignore this file. It
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #121051|0 |1
is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #9 from Gerhard Schaber ---
Created attachment 121074
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=121074=edit
build info file from the bisect for the first bad version
This is the build
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|vmik...@collabora.co.uk
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #8 from Gerhard Schaber ---
Created attachment 121051
--> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=121051=edit
build info file from the bisect for the first bad version
--
You are
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Gerhard Schaber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Gerhard Schaber changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #6 from Gerhard Schaber ---
Cor Nouws, you set the
TooBusyNowNeedsFurtherTestingForPossibleRegressionAndPossibleDuplicates in the
Whiteboard field. Since this is bibisected, maybe you want to reconsider
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
Whiteboard|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #4 from Gerhard Schaber ---
The missing macro is, though.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
Libreoffice-bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=95959
--- Comment #3 from Gerhard Schaber ---
Yes, forget about the menu. I accidentally stored it in the profile instead of
the file (it can be stored in the file itself as well). The menu is not a
problem.
--
You are
20 matches
Mail list logo