https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #8 from Bastián Díaz ---
(In reply to Michael Stahl from comment #7)
Sure you may be right, but to use Java to run a Javascript engine is not the
most efficient way anyway. Maybe V8 or
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #7 from Michael Stahl ---
> - LibreOffice uses the Rhino engine to support JavaScript. Rhino is written
> in Java, it is heavy and slow for complex macros.
this is utterly irrelevant - your macro is going
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #6 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Johan PIQUET from comment #5)
> Sorry, I mean "duketape" not "dukescript".
Oh ok :) I'm not a dev, so have not done anything. You could study the thing a
bit and then
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #5 from Johan PIQUET ---
Sorry, I mean "duketape" not "dukescript".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
___
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Johan PIQUET from comment #3)
> I was thinking to create an integration between dukescript and libreoffice.
> This could be a first step to give it a try.
>
> Already
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #3 from Johan PIQUET ---
I was thinking to create an integration between dukescript and libreoffice.
This could be a first step to give it a try.
Already some work in progress in your side ?
(I'm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
--- Comment #2 from Beluga ---
It seems choosing Spidermonkey would be shooting ourselves in the foot:
https://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/polkit-devel/2015-August/date.html
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
Beluga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97827
Bastián Díaz changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|Change the rhino engine for