[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132682] EDITING New paragraph before page starting table inserts page break
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132682 Gabor Kelemen changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED --- Comment #8 from Gabor Kelemen --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #7) > (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #6) > > But the entire process is much easier: Do not use Alt+Enter but set cursor > > at start of first paragraph in first cell and simple press Enter. That > > inserts a paragraph before the table and moves the page-break definition > > from the table to the new paragraph. > > Gabor, I think, this solves your problem. Do you agree? > => NEEDINFO Looks like I overthought this one. Thanks to Regina! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 103100] [META] Writer table bugs
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103100 Bug 103100 depends on bug 132682, which changed state. Bug 132682 Summary: EDITING New paragraph before page starting table inserts page break https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132682 What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTABUG -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 123600] LO-Viewer Writer UI unusable on LineageOS
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=123600 Michael Weghorn changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #6 from Michael Weghorn --- https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/current.html now offers a daily build for Android again. Can you please retest? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132891] Typing before a formatted word does not formatting but it does when word is at beginning of the line
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132891 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Keywords||needsUXEval -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127922] 'Droid Sans Thai' font shows numeric characters incorrectly.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127922 --- Comment #21 from Nukool Chompuparn --- Created attachment 161313 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161313&action=edit The problem still exists in 6.4.4.2. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127922] 'Droid Sans Thai' font shows numeric characters incorrectly.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127922 --- Comment #20 from Nukool Chompuparn --- (In reply to Ming Hua from comment #12) > As the reporter of bug 126248, I was looking into this bug to see if they > are related, but I have no experience in Thai or Thai fonts. > > After downloading Droid Sans Thai font from Internet (TTF format, 35584 > bytes), I tried to preview it on Windows, and noticed that it doesn't show > the same numeric characters as Nukool's "correct" screenshot. > > @Nukool: Would you please clarify where is your Droid Sans Thai font from? > (Fedora package?) And can you attach the font or provide a download link if > possible? Sorry for a very late reply, Droid Sans Thai is from Fedora Workstation. F.Y.I. Now I have moved from Fedora 32 KDE Desktop Spin to Fedora 32 Cinnamon Desktop Spin. The problem still exists in 6.4.4.2 as well, please see attachment. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133216] Objects are not printed (Win-only)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133216 Aron Budea changed: What|Removed |Added CC||qui...@gmail.com --- Comment #15 from Aron Budea --- (In reply to Aron Budea from comment #14) > (In reply to Timur from comment #3) > > But with today's build and change in bug 133215, both with and without Skia > > prints are empty. > The empty prints started with the following commit: > https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/ > ?id=34a699f1894f30f68c3243784586617e01e60ab6 > authorChris Sherlock > 2020-05-12 22:35:59 +1000 > committer Tomaž Vajngerl2020-05-20 10:54:47 > +0200 > > vcl: refactor by creating GetActionAfterBackgroundAction() function Chris, the problem with this commit is in the following line: https://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/vcl/source/gdi/print2.cxx?r=34a699f1#714 MetaAction* pCurrAct <= when passing a pointer like this, you don't get back the changed pointer, and the 'for' loop after this relies on the processed pCurrAct. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132983] LibreOffice.calc data|statistics|z-test repeated results
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132983 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132729] Anchor position on file open different from file save
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132729 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133329] Word Pro .lwp import crashes Libre Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133329 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132891] Typing before a formatted word does not formatting but it does when word is at beginning of the line
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132891 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132824] EDITING: Embedded Firebird - SQL select statements that require dates to be converted to strings produce incorrect results for dates earlier than 15 OCT 1582
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132824 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132813] Changing page wrap does not take immediately effect (needs move of the shape/save reload)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132813 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132818] Moving shape moves anchor (to character) to different character
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132818 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133329] Word Pro .lwp import crashes Libre Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133329 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131479] Portrait / Landcape button top level
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131479 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132841] Enabling contour for page wrap left or right or optimal switches wrap to Page wrap
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132841 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133006] File shown on macOS title bar not being updated when saving a document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133006 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132656] Show proper actual dimensions in Compress Image dialog
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132656 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127723] Calc Slow to open and hangs when sorting or filtering. Version 6.3.1.2
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127723 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Rafael, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129080] Libreoffice FC31
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129080 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear francesco.cavallari, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 129014] crop module
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129014 --- Comment #9 from QA Administrators --- Dear jon.nicolas, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126546] Deficiencies in Manage Styles (possibly related to import filters)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126546 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear Adalbert Hanßen, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127714] Freeze rows and split window don't pin properly in Libreoffice calc 6.3.1.2
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127714 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear John M, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133006] File shown on macOS title bar not being updated when saving a document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133006 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 102305] Rotation of AutoLayout textboxes not applied
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102305 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Yousuf Philips (jay) (retired), To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100940] Clicking the right mouse button scrolls a page
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100940 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear fiftyigfuci_f_mi, To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today, LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed bugs which have not been touched for over a year. There have been thousands of bug fixes and commits since anyone checked on this bug report. During that time, it's possible that the bug has been fixed, or the details of the problem have changed. We'd really appreciate your help in getting confirmation that the bug is still present. If you have time, please do the following: Test to see if the bug is still present with the latest version of LibreOffice from https://www.libreoffice.org/download/ If the bug is present, please leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. If the bug is NOT present, please set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED-WORKSFORME and leave a comment that includes the information from Help - About LibreOffice. Please DO NOT Update the version field Reply via email (please reply directly on the bug tracker) Set the bug's Status field to RESOLVED - FIXED (this status has a particular meaning that is not appropriate in this case) If you want to do more to help you can test to see if your issue is a REGRESSION. To do so: 1. Download and install oldest version of LibreOffice (usually 3.3 unless your bug pertains to a feature added after 3.3) from https://downloadarchive.documentfoundation.org/libreoffice/old/ 2. Test your bug 3. Leave a comment with your results. 4a. If the bug was present with 3.3 - set version to 'inherited from OOo'; 4b. If the bug was not present in 3.3 - add 'regression' to keyword Feel free to come ask questions or to say hello in our QA chat: https://kiwiirc.com/nextclient/irc.freenode.net/#libreoffice-qa Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-UntouchedBug -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 84837] Make show/hide comments UNO command work in Calc
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=84837 mymodalert changed: What|Removed |Added URL|https://www.anisharoy.com |https://mymodalert.com/prod ||uct/modafinil-200mg/ --- Comment #226 from mymodalert --- Buy Modafinil online from MyModalert online pharmacy with free shipping. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] Clarify clock time (HH:MM, MM:SS, ...) and duration time ([HH]:MM, [MM]:SS, ...) formatting in help; (ignore the MM month vs minute discussion)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170 --- Comment #22 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #21) > on 1/10 of a second precision A thinko: on whole seconds, of course. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] Clarify clock time (HH:MM, MM:SS, ...) and duration time ([HH]:MM, [MM]:SS, ...) formatting in help; (ignore the MM month vs minute discussion)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170 --- Comment #21 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #19) Comment 18 shows just how incompetent Albrecht Müller is, all that wall of text being incorrect attempt to standardize on 1/10 of a second precision. And all the distraction he caused in his endless comments resulted in that, being a poor variation of the approach I suggested elsewhere to standardize on millisecond precision for displaying times, i.e. round times to nearest millisecond (as opposed to durations shown rounded to last shown digit), allowing to get incorrect s/m/h/d/m/y on that boundary, and accepting it as the trade-off. With that aggressive graphomany poured to others in multiple time-related issues, he only consistently makes fixing everything harder by hiding the essense (e.g., what needs documenting here) and scaring people away. I suggest hiding his comments using spam tag. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133216] Objects are not printed (Win-only)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133216 --- Comment #14 from Aron Budea --- (In reply to Timur from comment #3) > But with today's build and change in bug 133215, both with and without Skia > prints are empty. The empty prints started with the following commit: https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=34a699f1894f30f68c3243784586617e01e60ab6 author Chris Sherlock 2020-05-12 22:35:59 +1000 committer Tomaž Vajngerl2020-05-20 10:54:47 +0200 vcl: refactor by creating GetActionAfterBackgroundAction() function -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] Clarify clock time (HH:MM, MM:SS, ...) and duration time ([HH]:MM, [MM]:SS, ...) formatting in help; (ignore the MM month vs minute discussion)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170 --- Comment #20 from Albrecht Müller --- The last sentence in the description of my workaround: The workaround cannot easily extended to respect fractional parts as the SECOND function is specified to round to the nearest second. Thus this workaround is intended for cases where you deal with whole numbers of seconds that may contain round-off errors. This seems to be a pretty common case. What I expect to gain is to get consistent results from the date and time functions such as SECOND, MINUTE etc. This workaround should also fix situation where you see calculations such as 18 minutes - 8 minutes = 9 minutes without the need to care about the wall clock vs. duration distinction (see bug 132083). The workaround is just a by-product of the analysis I tried in attachment 160356 (Trying to clarify clock vs duration time). In my opinion date and time functions are closely related to formatting. Assume you format some date and time value with no fractional part at the seconds position. Then the value at the seconds position should be exactly the value returned by the SECOND function for the same value. This should be true for the other functions such as MINUTE, HOUR, DAY, MONTH and YEAR too. In this context (ignoring the fractions of seconds) your examples show the correct behaviour: 2020-02-02 02:02:02.99 rounded to the nearest second is 2020-02-02 02:02:03 and 2020-02-02 02:02:59.99 rounded to the nearest second is 2020-02-02 02:03:00 A few words to the results of the analysis in the attachment: The specification of the date and time functions contains serious flaws. Therefore I think it is impossible to implement a reasonable date and time arithmetic that is based on this specification (see also bug 127476 comment 10). If you try you will need a scaring long help information explaining a lot of unexpected behaviour. Using different rounding strategies for wall clock time and durations may solve problems of calculation such as wall clock time - wall clock time → duration but not wall clock time + duration → wall clock time as in the latter case the round down mechanism for wall clock time will transform tiny round-off errors into clearly visible arithmetic errors. (See bug 131151, I could not try my workaround in this case as the ROUND function seems not to work in text tables) There is a rounding strategy that should work in the same way for wall clock time as well as for durations: 1. Multiply the date and time value by the number or seconds in a day, i.e. 86400. 2. Round this value to the required number of digits in the fractional part of the second. This step provides the best possible approximation and makes the calculation stable against round-off errors. 3. Separate the number into an integer and a fractional part. The fractional part is used to format the fractional part in the seconds value. The integer part is used to calculate all date and time information such as seconds, minutes, … year. As these calculations are based on exact integer values there are no rounding problems in this part. Note: You may get different integer values depending on the number of digits in the fractional part. As a consequence _all_ date and time functions need a parameter that tells them this number of digits. This parameter should default to zero. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125712] LibreOffice Writer menu toolbar freezes after some seconds
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125712 Corey Bailey changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Linux (All) |All Version|6.0.7.3 release |6.4.4.1 rc Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All --- Comment #12 from Corey Bailey --- You need an Icon! The blank page icon that installs with the program is lame IMHO. So, I generally pick from the available Windoze icons & install one of them. Use the graphic(logo?)that appears in the installation window? It's Kewel! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127476] Rounding behaviour of YEAR and SECOND function is inconsistent
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127476 --- Comment #10 from Albrecht Müller --- The specification of the SECOND function: - 6.10.16 SECOND Summary: Extracts the second (the integer 0 through 59) from a time. This function presumes that leap seconds never exist. Syntax: SECOND( TimeParam T ) Returns: Number Constraints: None Semantics: Extract from T the second value, 0 through 59, as per a clock. Note that this returns an integer, without a fractional part. Note also that this rounds to the nearest second, instead of returning the integer part of the seconds. This is equal to: DayFraction = (T - INT(T)) HourFraction = (DayFraction * 24 - INT(DayFraction * 24)) MinuteFraction = (HourFraction * 60 - INT(HourFraction * 60)) Second = ROUND(MinuteFraction * 60) See also MONTH 6.10.13, DAY 6.10.5, HOUR 6.10.10, MINUTE 6.10.12, INT 6.17.2 -- Assume T = 59.6/86400 DayFraction = (59.6/86400 - INT(59.6/86400)) = 59.6/86400 - 0 = 59.6/86400 HourFraction = ((59.6/86400) * 24 - INT((59.6/86400) * 24)) = 59.6/3600 - INT(59.6/3600) = 59.6/3600 - 0 = 59.6/3600 MinuteFraction = ((59.6/3600) * 60 - INT((59.6/3600) * 60)) = 59.6/60 - INT(59.6/60) = 59.6/60 - 0 = 59.6/60 Second = ROUND((59.6/60) * 60) = ROUND(59.6) = 60 But: "Extracts the second (the integer 0 through 59) from a time." How is it possible to implement this specification correctly? The second problem with this specification is that it uses different rounding strategies for different functions. Therefore any implementation has to return inconsistent results in certain situations. The third is that the specified round down mechanism lets tiny round-off errors surface as arithmetic errors. Excel seems to use a carefully designed rounding strategy that handles the peculiarities of the floating point representation. Maybe this works roughly in way that I tried to explain in attachment 160356 (Trying to clarify clock vs duration time). This analysis inspired the workaround in bug 127170 comment 18 which hopefully enables date and time functions to return consistent results. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133425] I get the message "LibreOffice update available. Click the icon for more information", but there's no icon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133425 --- Comment #1 from Bart --- Created attachment 161312 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161312&action=edit The balloon with the update remark This image shows the balloon with the update remark, but it also shows there's no icon to click. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133425] New: I get the message "LibreOffice update available. Click the icon for more information", but there's no icon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133425 Bug ID: 133425 Summary: I get the message "LibreOffice update available. Click the icon for more information", but there's no icon Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.4.2.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: trivial Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: bart...@tushmail.com Description: (I assume that the summary gives a sufficient description. Otherwise, please refer to the section "Steps to Reproduce".) Steps to Reproduce: 1. I start LibreOffice 2. In some cases the message 3. LibreOffice update available. Click the icon for more information", 4. There's however no icon This doesn't happen every time that I start LibreOffice, but it does happen from time to time. Actual Results: There's no icon. Expected Results: I had expected an icon that I could click. Reproducible: Sometimes User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 6.4.2.2 Build ID: 4e471d8c02c9c90f512f7f9ead8875b57fcb1ec3 CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.19; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3; Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI-Language: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133421] Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133421 --- Comment #2 from peterpqa --- I obviously screwed up somewhere and double-reported. My apologies. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127852] UI: locked odt document disables menus from keyboard
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127852 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME --- Comment #7 from Dieter --- WORKSFORME ist correct in such a Case. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130868] Writer hangs when trying to convert odt with footnotes to pdf
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130868 --- Comment #8 from Telesto --- Opening the file & copy/pasting the text to a new document solves the problem for some reason -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133424] New: 'Go To Page' ignored if cursor is in a comment (in Track Changes mode)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133424 Bug ID: 133424 Summary: 'Go To Page' ignored if cursor is in a comment (in Track Changes mode) Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.3.5.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: chris-libreoff...@janicki.org Description: With Track Changes on, the "Go To" page feature (triggered by clicking on the page number in the lower/left corner) will not jump to a different page when the editing cursor is in a comment box. Instead, the current page is re-selected, usually resulting in a slight scrolling adjustment. If you reposition the cursor by clicking in the document body, then Go To page will work. Steps to Reproduce: 1.Track Changes on 2.On a page > 1, add a comment (right-click, then "Comment") 3.While still editing comment (cursor in comment box), use "Go To" modal dialog (click on page number in lower/left corner of editor) 4. Enter page 1 (or any page different than the current) Actual Results: The current page just readjusts scrolling to position view at the top of the page. Expected Results: The editor should show the page seleted in "Go To" modal dialog. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: When cursor is in the document body (not in a comment), "Go To" works correctly. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127852] UI: locked odt document disables menus from keyboard
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127852 Nick Levinson changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|INSUFFICIENTDATA|FIXED --- Comment #6 from Nick Levinson --- I'm setting as fixed. Somehow, the problem is gone. Maybe a newer version fixed it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130693] PRINTING: font or style selectively changed from Writer in PDF printout
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130693 --- Comment #6 from Nick Levinson --- I'm still unclear. Did you print to paper from the LibreOffice PDF? Printing to PDF doesn't sound like paper, but maybe I misunderstand what you intended to say. This may be a more subtle problem. Okular is an interesting workaround, but it doesn't apply to using commercial printers. Likewise, when I use the commercial printers, I bring the PDF via sneakernet: my flash drive, thus not LO. The problem I had occurred on both Xerox and Canon printers, multiple machine of each brand, over a period of weeks, in different store chains (Xerox was at Staples and Canon was at FedEx Office (formerly Kinko's)). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97629] [META] Help Content Modernization
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97629 Bug 97629 depends on bug 126813, which changed state. Bug 126813 Summary: Top green band obscures top lines of referenced help section when following an URL with a fragment https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126813 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 87740] [META] Anchor and text wrapping bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87740 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||105638 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105638 [Bug 105638] Fileopen: 165 pages DOC with simple table non responsive (column with merged cells) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 105638] Fileopen: 165 pages DOC with simple table non responsive (column with merged cells)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105638 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||tele...@surfxs.nl Blocks||87740 --- Comment #17 from Telesto --- The document is filled with images anchored to character.. Copy/paste doc from Word to LibreOffice, or open the file with navigator open) So probably a layout loop caused by to character anchoring. And the multiple page split table isn't helpful either. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87740 [Bug 87740] [META] Anchor and text wrapping bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133422] Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133422 --- Comment #2 from m.a.riosv --- *** Bug 133421 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133421] Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133421 m.a.riosv changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED CC||miguelangelrv@libreoffice.o ||rg --- Comment #1 from m.a.riosv --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 133422 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132824] EDITING: Embedded Firebird - SQL select statements that require dates to be converted to strings produce incorrect results for dates earlier than 15 OCT 1582
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132824 --- Comment #1 from libre officer --- This is because "Thursday, 14 October 1582" is a proleptic date, which means it is a date that is calculated as a Gregorian date before the date of its adoption (Friday, 15 October 1582). The "Thursday, 4 October 1582" is in fact a Julian date not a Gregorian one. This needs to be further discussed. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 119023] Fileopen DOC: OOM/ missing or black images when opening a file contains multiple images
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=119023 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|major |normal Priority|high|medium -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90028] Importer drops Lotus Word Pro document formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90028 --- Comment #18 from Todd --- > I don't understand how you can say "you obviously have the resources" > without quantifying the claim in any way. You have to understand that we > have over 12000 open reports: Here is an idea. Pick out a new release. 7.0 will do. And do not add any new features. Instead put your resources into fixing as many bugs as you possible can. Once you got all the bugs fixed, then start releases with new features. And occasionally, go bad and have another bug fix only release to catch up. If you keep with new feature and don't fix your bugs, it is Open Office all over again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 90028] Importer drops Lotus Word Pro document formatting
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90028 --- Comment #17 from Todd --- I installed LibreOfficeDev_7.0.0.0.alpha1_Linux_x86-64_rpm.tar.gz on a virtual machine untouched by previous Libre office installations. I was able to import the attachment to bug 133329 without crashing. The import really stunk, but it did not crash. So, this bug still exists. Document formatting is still messed up on import. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133329] Word Pro .lwp import crashes Libre Office
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133329 --- Comment #4 from Todd --- I installed LibreOfficeDev_7.0.0.0.alpha1_Linux_x86-64_rpm.tar.gz on a virtual machine untouched by previous Libre office installations. I was able to import the attachment to this bug without crashing. The import really stunk, but it did not crash. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133321] Impress GUI really slow with 360MB document with lots of images
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133321 --- Comment #13 from Telesto --- Bug 105500 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133423] New: Implement chart:regression-moving-type
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133423 Bug ID: 133423 Summary: Implement chart:regression-moving-type Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha1+ Master Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Chart Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rb.hensc...@t-online.de Created attachment 161310 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161310&action=edit Example with screenshot from Gnumeric ODF 1.3 has the property chart:regression-moving-type with values "prior", "center" and "averaged-abscissa". LibreOffice 7.0 does not know this property, but always calculates as "prior", which fortunately is the default value for this property. But especially "averaged-abscissa" is much better than "prior". Gnumeric can generate moving-average regression curves of type "averaged-abscissa". The attached file contains a screenshot from Gnumeric. My feature request is, to implement the property chart:regression-moving-type. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133408] LibreOffice crashed twice today each time I typed è into a document, using ALT+138.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133408 --- Comment #2 from gebusc...@gmail.com --- Created attachment 161309 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161309&action=edit Section of a draft glossary The problem section is in the right-hand cell of the last row on p. 3 (the row which has eskandalèz in the left-hand cell). The text in the problem cell starts 'noisy f. (JJT 29'. It was when I was trying to insert the following word - escalandèz - into the text and was typing the è that the system crashed each time. (As indicated in my bug report, I managed to complete the word in the end by copying an è from elsewhere in the text and pasting it in.) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133422] Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133422 --- Comment #1 from peterpqa --- Created attachment 161308 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161308&action=edit Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133422] New: Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133422
Bug ID: 133422
Summary: Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 6.2.8.2 release
Hardware: All
OS: Mac OS X (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Writer
Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: norsw...@gmail.com
Description:
Please also see Bug 133158. You may want to address both tab-order issues
together.
In LO v6.2.8.2 and earlier, Field Name overrides Tab Order, so I had to name
every field as "Field". See the attached "Alpha Name" example. All fields are
named "Field" except the highlighted ones - their names are typed into in each
field.
>From "Alfa", tabbing progresses properly through Row 1. But then, tabbing skips
over tab-order 201 ("Bravo") to tab-order 202, then skips over tab-order 301
("Charlie") to tab-order 302, etc.
With Bug 133158, I cannot confirm that this problem persisted in 6.3 or 6.4.
Perhaps in Windows, where Bug 133158 does not manifest?
Steps to Reproduce:
See description
Actual Results:
See description
Expected Results:
Software should obey my tab-order numbers, not Field Name alphanumeric order
Reproducible: Always
User Profile Reset: No
Additional Info:
Software let Field Name alphanumeric order override Tab Order
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133421] New: Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133421
Bug ID: 133421
Summary: Writer Forms Control Field Name overrides Tab Order
Product: LibreOffice
Version: 6.2.8.2 release
Hardware: All
OS: Mac OS X (All)
Status: UNCONFIRMED
Severity: normal
Priority: medium
Component: Writer
Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
Reporter: norsw...@gmail.com
Description:
Please also see Bug 133158. You may want to address both tab-order issues
together.
In LO v6.2.8.2 and earlier, Field Name overrides Tab Order, so I had to name
every field as "Field". See the attached "Alpha Name" example. All fields are
named "Field" except the highlighted ones - their names are typed into in each
field.
>From "Alfa", tabbing progresses properly through Row 1. But then, tabbing skips
over tab-order 201 ("Bravo") to tab-order 202, then skips over tab-order 301
("Charlie") to tab-order 302, etc.
With Bug 133158, I cannot confirm that this problem persisted in 6.3 or 6.4.
Perhaps in Windows, where Bug 133158 does not manifest?
Steps to Reproduce:
See description
Actual Results:
See description
Expected Results:
Software should obey my tab-order numbers, not Field Name alphanumeric order
Reproducible: Always
User Profile Reset: No
Additional Info:
Software let Field Name alphanumeric order override Tab Order
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133294] FILESAVE EPUB Enhancement for styles with page breaks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133294 --- Comment #10 from Dave --- I agree that splitting on heading is most logical, and it works fine for most of the document. The problem I run into is when I try to make Title styling show the title of an ebook on a separate page. Just to clarify... I do this: Right-click Title styling and choose Modify. Enter 3.0" Spacing Above Paragraph on the Indents & Spacing tab. Check Insert Break, type: Page, Position: After from the Text Flow tab. This gives me a title page where the title stands on its own, pushed toward the vertical center of my page. No other text flows onto the page. It outputs this way for ODF, and PDF (probably others as well) but EPUB ignores the "Insert Break, type: Page, Position: After" from the Text Flow tab. To me, they should all look the same, and I can achieve that by manually adding page-break-after: always; in the right place in stylesheet.css. That's the reason for my enhancement request. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133420] Release Notes for removal of trend lines for ODF 1.2 missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133420 --- Comment #1 from Regina Henschel --- Moving average properties are written in loext namespace in case of save to "ODF 1.2 extended" in Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) Build ID: 0e5e935deb0527c64865cfcc53a0421e56b74b6f CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 18362; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: de-DE (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL That is correct in principle. But neither LO 6.4.3 nor LO 7.0 can read it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 125780] Public key for verifying signature of AppImage packages not uploaded to key server(s) !
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=125780 Fernando changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|FIXED |--- Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #5 from Fernando --- Hi, I just downloaded the LibreOffice AppImage, and had to search a lot for the public key, until i finally did this: $ gpg2 --keyserver hkp://keys.gnupg.net --search-keys libreoffice.org And even then, the result was this: $ gpg2 --verify LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage.asc gpg: asumiendo que los datos firmados están en 'LibreOffice-still.standard-x86_64.AppImage' gpg: Firmado el mié 06 may 2020 09:13:32 -03 gpg:usando RSA clave D4761B78E365B53D gpg: Firma correcta de "Antonio Faccioli (LibreOffice AppImage Package) " [desconocido] gpg: ATENCIÓN: ¡Esta clave no está certificada por una firma de confianza! gpg: No hay indicios de que la firma pertenezca al propietario. Huellas dactilares de la clave primaria: DA5E 52F8 C6C9 DC6F 1473 E903 D476 1B78 E365 B53D So, i don't see how is this fixed. It's supposed to bring trust, otherwise why not just publish the SHA256, that at least is easy to verify, and doesn't shows warnings everywhere? Regards -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133294] FILESAVE EPUB Enhancement for styles with page breaks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133294 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org --- Comment #9 from Dieter --- (In reply to Dave from comment #8) > Using split on pagebreak instead of split on header makes the output look > exactly like I would expect. Thank you for that suggestion. > > However, I would consider this a workaround and would still like to request > the enhancement. After reading infos from LO help [1], I would disagree, because others perhaps prefer split after heading. But I'm not familiar with that topic, so let's ask design team for input and decision [1] https://help.libreoffice.org/7.0/en-GB/text/shared/01/ref_epub_export.html?System=WIN&DbPAR=WRITER&HID=writerperfect/ui/exportepub/dialog-action_area1#bm_@@nowidget@@ -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133321] Impress GUI really slow with 360MB document with lots of images
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133321 --- Comment #12 from Buovjaga --- (In reply to Telesto from comment #11) > Does disabling the sidebar in 6.4.3.2 make a difference? Ah, good catch: it does make a difference. Apparently it is about having the Properties deck visible specifically. With 7.0 I happened to have a different deck and this was the reason the lag did not show. Do you know of an existing report? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133396] VCL plugins treats missing GtkAdjustment sub-elements differently from GTK (reference)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133396 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | Ever confirmed|0 |1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133420] New: Release Notes for removal of trend lines for ODF 1.2 missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133420 Bug ID: 133420 Summary: Release Notes for removal of trend lines for ODF 1.2 missing Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha1+ Master Hardware: All URL: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/ReleaseNotes/7.0 OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Chart Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rb.hensc...@t-online.de This is a follow up to bug 130133. Now the for ODF 1.2 invalid trend lines of type 'polynomial' and 'moving average' are no longer written in case of 'ODF 1.2 extended'. But the note in the release notes is missing. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133321] Impress GUI really slow with 360MB document with lots of images
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133321 --- Comment #11 from Telesto --- Does disabling the sidebar in 6.4.3.2 make a difference? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126813] Top green band obscures top lines of referenced help section when following an URL with a fragment
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126813 Olivier Hallot changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |olivier.hallot@libreoffice. |desktop.org |org -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133260] FILEOPEN XLSX: Calc doesn't handle SUMIFS() with array as the third parameter correctly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133260 --- Comment #6 from Eike Rathke --- Yes. It looks like an inline array (unlike a cell range reference) as argument where a scalar value is expected would force array mode of the entire formula expression. Question remains what happens if it is not an inline array but an array/matrix returned from a function that itself is not in a forced array context. The results of these examples could be interesting: =SUM(ABS(MUNIT(2))) =SUM(ABS(MUNIT(2)*-1)) If both behave the same as with the inline array the result should be 2 for both, otherwise 1 (for one or both expressions). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133321] Impress GUI really slow with 360MB document with lots of images
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133321 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added OS|All |Windows (All) --- Comment #10 from Buovjaga --- Ok, I am unable to get a correct bisect result, unfortunately. Menoo: can you try with 7.0: https://dev-builds.libreoffice.org/daily/master/current.html Use the tb77-TDF build. It installs separately. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 76219] HANG i#84870: WW8: large objects in Russian text / DOC with complex header&footer / ... may cause loop (see comment 7 and 8)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76219 --- Comment #27 from Telesto --- (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #26) > @Noel, I thought you might be interested in this issue... Another anchoring issues.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 76219] HANG i#84870: WW8: large objects in Russian text / DOC with complex header&footer / ... may cause loop (see comment 7 and 8)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76219 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87740 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87740 [Bug 87740] [META] Anchor and text wrapping bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 87740] [META] Anchor and text wrapping bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87740 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||76219 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=76219 [Bug 76219] HANG i#84870: WW8: large objects in Russian text / DOC with complex header&footer / ... may cause loop (see comment 7 and 8) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 101280] [META] Layout loops
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101280 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||38575 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38575 [Bug 38575] 2-page DOC or DOCX with image anchored to header yields page counting and block Writer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38575] 2-page DOC or DOCX with image anchored to header yields page counting and block Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38575 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||101280 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101280 [Bug 101280] [META] Layout loops -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 38575] 2-page DOC or DOCX with image anchored to header yields page counting and block Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38575 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks||87740 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87740 [Bug 87740] [META] Anchor and text wrapping bugs and enhancements -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 87740] [META] Anchor and text wrapping bugs and enhancements
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=87740 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||38575 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=38575 [Bug 38575] 2-page DOC or DOCX with image anchored to header yields page counting and block Writer -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 127170] Clarify clock time (HH:MM, MM:SS, ...) and duration time ([HH]:MM, [MM]:SS, ...) formatting in help; (ignore the MM month vs minute discussion)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127170 --- Comment #19 from Eike Rathke --- First, you may have overlooked that this now since some time (last year) is a Documentation request to clarify the current implementation and difference of wall clock / timestamp formats and duration formats. Talking about other means of how date+time could or could not be implemented in this bug thus is not helpful at all as it just confuses everyone, especially not so technically inclined, even more who actually wanted to write a documentation / help section. Your previous overly lengthy comments from April probably already scared everyone away. However.. (In reply to Albrecht Müller from comment #18) > Assume that t is some floating point number that is used to represent some > point in time. Then this value is mapped to (round(t*86400) + 0.1)/86400 You don't gain anything by that, it would just introduce errors at other places. For examples: (output using -MM-DD HH:MM:SS.00 wall clock format that does not round) Input: 2020-02-02 Date serial number: 43863 Your calculation applied: 43863.011574 Formatted output: 2020-02-02 00:00:00.10 So far, almost good, *if* ignoring the fractional second *if* no such number format or calculation asking for it is involved. Input: 2020-02-02 02:02:02.99 Date serial number: 43863.0847568287 Your calculation applied: 43863.0847581019 Formatted output: 2020-02-02 02:02:03.10 => bad second value and bad 100th value. Input: 2020-02-02 02:02:59.99 Date serial number: 43863.0854165509 Your calculation applied: 43863.0854178241 Formatted output: 2020-02-02 02:03:00.10 => bad minute value and bad second value and bad 100th value. ... and so on. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126109] EDITING/UI: Slow when replacing string to number
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126109 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Priority|medium |high -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126109] EDITING/UI: Slow when replacing string to number
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126109 --- Comment #6 from Telesto --- Bibisected to the same commit STR 1. Open attachment 161303 2. CTRL+H 3. Replace X to 2 & Press Replace all (9 seconds prior to the identified commit) minutes after -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126109] EDITING/UI: Slow when replacing string to number
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126109 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added CC||ko...@libreoffice.org --- Comment #5 from Telesto --- Adding CC to Kohei Yoshida -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126109] EDITING/UI: Slow when replacing string to number
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126109 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Version|5.0.0.5 release |4.2.0.4 release --- Comment #4 from Telesto --- Range of commits https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/log/?qt=range&q=c7bdee8dbd1cf260a8513a0d31b36f90daa70f1c..ec0080c40cfdb26896537f47a4c2e0439f9afdb1 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133294] FILESAVE EPUB Enhancement for styles with page breaks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133294
--- Comment #8 from Dave ---
Using split on pagebreak instead of split on header makes the output look
exactly like I would expect. Thank you for that suggestion.
However, I would consider this a workaround and would still like to request the
enhancement. My reasoning is this:
1) As an ebook author, I should not need to concern myself with the internals
of the EPUB format to the point of knowing how it divides up the XHTML files
inside the archive. It's not intuitive.
2) page-break-after: always; and page-break-before: always; are fully supported
in the EPUB 3 specification. Why not map Writer's break before/after style
options to those directly?
I think of it like this:
I have a line of text, "Section Title", that I've styled as a title in Writer.
The EPUB xhtml should have something like Section
Title
The EPBU css should contain "title { page-break-before: always; }", if I've
specified a break after in Writer, along with any other corresponding styling
I've used when modifying the style.
Thanks again for maintaining such a wonderful open source product and for
giving me a workaround to my current dilemma. Your time and effort is much
appreciated.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97629] [META] Help Content Modernization
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97629 Bug 97629 depends on bug 128519, which changed state. Bug 128519 Summary: [NEWHELP] Automate icon replacement table for Help build https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128519 What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128519] [NEWHELP] Automate icon replacement table for Help build
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128519 Olivier Hallot changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |FIXED Status|NEW |RESOLVED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133400] Not possible to paste into comments
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133400 --- Comment #4 from b. --- sorry ... -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133294] FILESAVE EPUB Enhancement for styles with page breaks
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133294 --- Comment #7 from Dave --- Created attachment 161307 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161307&action=edit EPUB using split on pagebreak as suggested. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 102847] [META] Quick Find, Search and Replace
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||133259 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133259 [Bug 133259] Find All should always report no. of matches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 86066] [META] bugs and improvements to the statusbar
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86066 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||133259 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133259 [Bug 133259] Find All should always report no. of matches -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133259] Find All should always report no. of matches
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133259 Dieter changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||needsUXEval CC||libreoffice-ux-advise@lists ||.freedesktop.org Blocks||86066, 102847 --- Comment #4 from Dieter --- (In reply to QA Administrators from comment #3) > [Automated Action] NeedInfo-To-Unconfirmed Thanks for the file. I confirm the observed behaviour. But AFAIK statusbar shows number of the words and characters, that are selected (and that are of course the search results). So perhaps it won't be trivial to display search results, if no word and character is selected. So let's add design team for further opinion. Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86066 [Bug 86066] [META] bugs and improvements to the statusbar https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102847 [Bug 102847] [META] Quick Find, Search and Replace -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132831] Finish button has no effect when using form creation wizard at the end of creation process. UI.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132831 --- Comment #15 from John Deal --- Confirmed on different Xubuntu 20.04/ibreOffice 6.4.3.2 fully-updated system. Form Wizard failed as described. Ran again on same system using built LibreOffice 7.0.0.alpha1+ right after the above on same DB. Form Wizard worked fine. Seems to be fixed but this seems to imply not a Ubuntu package issue. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133419] New: Animation controls: duplicate effect names.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133419 Bug ID: 133419 Summary: Animation controls: duplicate effect names. Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.3.2.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: jxxxbx...@yandex.ru Description: Control: Side Bar>Animation>Category:Motion Paths>Effect. The Left and Right effects are in the Basic and Lines and Curves sections. Steps to Reproduce: Select the Left or Right effect from the Basic section. Actual Results: When you select the Left/Right effect from the Basic section, the cursor jumps to the Lines and Curves section. Expected Results: Left/Right effect should be in only one section. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Версия: 6.3.2.2 ID сборки: FreeBSD ports 6.3.2_1 Потоков ЦП: 2; ОС:FreeBSD 12.1; Отрисовка ИП: по умолчанию; VCL: gtk2; Локаль: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); Язык интерфейса: ru-RU Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133408] LibreOffice crashed twice today each time I typed è into a document, using ALT+138.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133408 --- Comment #1 from Telesto --- Is it possible to share the document in question.. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133418] New: EXPORT DOCX: Page style names not preserved & new styles added
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133418 Bug ID: 133418 Summary: EXPORT DOCX: Page style names not preserved & new styles added Product: LibreOffice Version: Inherited From OOo Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: filters and storage Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: tele...@surfxs.nl Description: EXPORT DOCX: Page style names not preserved & new styles added Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open attachment 161273 [details] 2. Inspect Styles panel -> Page styles 2. Export to DOCX 3. File Reload 4. Check again Actual Results: * New styles are added * Style names are lost (everything is called converted + number) Expected Results: * Should retain style names * Should not add new styles Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Version: 7.0.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) Build ID: 21875558f6c478f07d68ff39e025d7ffd451674f CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133417] New: EDITING: Insert checkbox easily as in Google Sheets
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133417 Bug ID: 133417 Summary: EDITING: Insert checkbox easily as in Google Sheets Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: om...@yahoo.com Description: In Google Sheets there's an option in the menu: Insert -> Checkbox. Checkbox is inserted in current cell, is clickable and may be evaluated by cell reference as TRUE (activated) or FALSE (deactivated). In LibO it's necessary to go to menu View -> Toolbars -> Form Design -> Design Mode -> Insert Checkbox -> Drag with mouse -> Right click in Checkbox -> Anchor to cell -> Right click in Checkbox -> Properties -> Linked cell -> Manually link cell -> Hide cell content (to no overlap checkbox) -> Design Mode -> View -> Toolbars > Form Design Steps to Reproduce: 1.View 2.Toolbars 3.Form Design 4.Activate Design Mode 5.Click Checkbox 6.Drag with mouse within correct cell 7.Right click in Checkbox 8.Anchor to cell 9.Right click in Checkbox 10.Properties 11.Linked cell 12.Manually link cell 13.Hide cell content (to not overlap checkbox) 14.Deactivate Design Mode 15.View 16.Toolbars 17.Hide Form Design To create a checkbox in every cell it has to be done manually, one by one, reproducing the steps from 5 to 13. If copied and pasted needs to be edited to change its name. Actual Results: Checkbox is inserted, linked to a cell, clickable. Checkbox can't be resized only text. Expected Results: In Google Sheets is so easy to do, only two steps!: 1.Insert 2.Checkbox Checkbox is inserted in current cell, is clickable and may be evaluated by cell reference as TRUE (activated) or FALSE (deactivated). To create a checkbox in every cell it may be copied and pasted to a group of cells, to all cells in a row or all cells in a column. Checkbox may be resized adjusting font size. It could be a property or content of a cell, this way it's not necessary to go through Form Controls. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Versión: 6.4.4.2 Id. de compilación: 1:6.4.4~rc2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1 Subprocs. CPU: 4; SO: Linux 5.3; Repres. IU: predet.; VCL: gtk3; Configuración regional: es-MX (es_MX.UTF-8); Idioma de IU: es-ES Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133416] Text Object Animation: Effects draw text objects with garbage.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133416 --- Comment #1 from JBrown --- Created attachment 161306 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161306&action=edit Unnecessary colored lines are drawn on text objects. A chess field is a text object. It allows you to see garbage in detail. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133300] Please add the ability to search for Page Styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133300 --- Comment #14 from Mike Kaganski --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > First page has style "Left page", second after manual break "Right page". > Ctrl+H > Attributes... = Page Style > Find = Right page, Replace = Left page > => neither Find nor Replace work. So the point is that we actually have the > feature but it's not working as expected. This is misconception. Searching for attributes is not meant to work like you imagined: setting a checkmark to an attribute, then put the wanted attribute values into Find/Replace boxes. That would, e.g., be meaningless if you check several attributes... The feature allows searching for *text* defined in the Find box, which has the attributes selected that simply differ from default. See help [1] for details. A different thing is that actually selecting "Page style" attribute doesn't seem to work anyway. Note also that page style is a setting of a paragraph (style), so searching for "page style" would only make sense when searching for paragraphs ... [1] https://help.libreoffice.org/6.4/en-US/text/shared/guide/find_attributes.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133416] New: Text Object Animation: Effects draw text objects with garbage.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133416 Bug ID: 133416 Summary: Text Object Animation: Effects draw text objects with garbage. Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.3.2.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: jxxxbx...@yandex.ru Description: Effects draw text objects with garbage. Affect: Entrance, Emphasis and Motion Paths effects. Steps to Reproduce: See attachment. Actual Results: Garbage appears on the slide. Expected Results: Garbage should not be. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Версия: 6.3.2.2 ID сборки: FreeBSD ports 6.3.2_1 Потоков ЦП: 2; ОС:FreeBSD 12.1; Отрисовка ИП: по умолчанию; VCL: gtk2; Локаль: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); Язык интерфейса: ru-RU Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133415] New: Object Animation: The effect does not take into account the current position of the object.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133415 Bug ID: 133415 Summary: Object Animation: The effect does not take into account the current position of the object. Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.3.2.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: FreeBSD Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: jxxxbx...@yandex.ru Description: The effect does not take into account the current position of the object. Affect: Entrance:Fly, Entrance:Fly in Slow, Entrance:Spiral In, Entrance:Boomerang, Entrance:Bounce, Entrance:Movie Credits, Entrance:Float, Entrance:Put on the Brakes (partially), Entrance:Falling In, Entrance:Thread, Entrance:Whip, Entrance:Sling, Entrance:Magnify, Entrance:Curve Up, Entrance:Glide, Entrance:Flip (partially), Entrance:Fold, Entrance:Stretchy, Entrance:Ease In, Entrance:Rise Up, Entrance:Unfold, Entrance:Ascend, Entrance:Center Revolve, Entrance:Descend, Emphasis:Wave, Exit:Fly Out, Exit:Crawl Out, Exit:Bounce, Exit:Movie Credits, Exit:Float, Exit:Put on the Brackes, Exit:Thread, Exit:Whip, Exit:Sling, Exit:Magnify, Exit:Curve Down, Exit:Glide, Exit:Fold, Exit:Easy Out, Exit:Sink Down, Exit:Unfold, Exit:Descend, Exit:Center Revolve, Exit:Ascend. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create an object. 2. Add an Entrance:Appear effect for the object. 3. For the object add the effect of Motion Paths:Curve (Set Start>After Previous, Duration: 5.00 sec). 4. Add an Exit:Fly Out effect for the object (Set Start>After Previous, Duration: 5.00 sec). 5. Run the animation. Actual Results: The object appears. Then the object moves along the path. Further, the object disappears, starting from an unexpected position. The final effect does not take into account the new position of the object. Expected Results: The effect should work in the current location Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Версия: 6.3.2.2 ID сборки: FreeBSD ports 6.3.2_1 Потоков ЦП: 2; ОС:FreeBSD 12.1; Отрисовка ИП: по умолчанию; VCL: gtk2; Локаль: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); Язык интерфейса: ru-RU Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133414] New: Object Animation: Animation duration does not match the specified effect duration.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133414 Bug ID: 133414 Summary: Object Animation: Animation duration does not match the specified effect duration. Product: LibreOffice Version: 6.3.2.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: FreeBSD Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Impress Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: jxxxbx...@yandex.ru Description: Animation duration does not match the specified effect duration. Affect: All effects that have a Duration parameter. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Create the first object. 2. For the first object, add the Circle effect. Set Duration to 5.00 sec. 4. Create a second object. 5. For the second object, add the Appear effect, Set Start>After Previous. 4. Run the animation. 5. For the first object, change the Direction from In to Out. 6. Run the animation. Actual Results: The first animation happens correctly. The second object appears immediately after the completion of the first effect. The second animation does not work correctly. The first object appears too quickly. Then a pause. Next, a second object appears. Expected Results: Animation should take all the time given to it. Reproducible: Always User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Temporary solution: Change the problem effect to Entrance: Appear or Exit: Disappear. Return the desired effect. Версия: 6.3.2.2 ID сборки: FreeBSD ports 6.3.2_1 Потоков ЦП: 2; ОС:FreeBSD 12.1; Отрисовка ИП: по умолчанию; VCL: gtk2; Локаль: ru-RU (ru_RU.UTF-8); Язык интерфейса: ru-RU Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 97694] Base macros cannot be digitally signed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97694 --- Comment #26 from Freischreiber <8...@gmx.net> --- Oh I see, the macros must be part of the document, so that LO can sign them, not part of the My Macros library container. (!) I was convinced LO cannot do that, since all my macros are in the library container... A little bit off-topic, but: Why does LO forget the signature of macros in a template file when a document is produced from it? The macros are exported to the document, but the signature is lost... Thank you. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.___ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
