[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128606] Copy a range from LO Calc and paste on 'Tables' panel of LO Base. Concerning boxes for type formatting are small
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128606 Robert Großkopf changed: What|Removed |Added CC||rob...@familiegrosskopf.de --- Comment #7 from Robert Großkopf --- Have tested this one with OpenSUSE Linux and LO 7.3.4.1 with VCL:kf5. On the left of the dialog appears a scrollbar if the field name has a length of more than 25 characters. The box couldn't be sized, but remember: There are systems like the internal Firebird database, which allow max. 31 characters here. All fields on the right will expand if I expand the dialog. See screenshot. Could be it is a special problem of some systems like Windows … -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149229] Installing Libre Office Breaks Other Tools
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149229 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Resolution|--- |NOTOURBUG --- Comment #4 from Julien Nabet --- If the apt triggers the pb, it might be a dependency pb so I'd rather say a Kali distrib pb. Could you submit a bug on Kali? Let's close this one. At worst, this tracker can be reopened. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 147224] LibreOffice without the Filter function
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147224 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard| QA:needsComment| -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148986] Support the "XF86Forward" and "XF86Back" presenter mouse / remote clicker shortcuts to move between slides in presentation mode
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148986 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Whiteboard|| QA:needsComment -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144960] "operations" are incorrectly applied to "formats only" in edit paste special
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144960 QA Administrators changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |INSUFFICIENTDATA -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 144960] "operations" are incorrectly applied to "formats only" in edit paste special
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144960 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Jack Danel, Please read this message in its entirety before proceeding. Your bug report is being closed as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to inactivity and a lack of information which is needed in order to accurately reproduce and confirm the problem. We encourage you to retest your bug against the latest release. If the issue is still present in the latest stable release, we need the following information (please ignore any that you've already provided): a) Provide details of your system including your operating system and the latest version of LibreOffice that you have confirmed the bug to be present b) Provide easy to reproduce steps – the simpler the better c) Provide any test case(s) which will help us confirm the problem d) Provide screenshots of the problem if you think it might help e) Read all comments and provide any requested information Once all of this is done, please set the bug back to UNCONFIRMED and we will attempt to reproduce the issue. Please do not: a) respond via email b) update the version field in the bug or any of the other details on the top section of our bug tracker Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-FollowUp -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145846] .docx file not loading with LibreOffice 7.2.2.2 ENG Win.x64
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145846 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear phil dawson, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145662] Downloading Update will not run
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145662 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Clive Nickerson, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145600] crash if i openthe print dialog and click the 'option' tab
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145600 --- Comment #2 from QA Administrators --- Dear Anjan Prajapati, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145595] Slow start
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145595 --- Comment #3 from QA Administrators --- Dear Luis Salcido, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 139506] LibreOffice lost documents
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=139506 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear ellengillette22, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142950] Crash in: mergedlo.dll
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142950 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear qve00761, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 137732] Every query in standalone forms are changing the status of the document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137732 --- Comment #17 from QA Administrators --- Dear michael, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 137102] UI: My first ever extension hits an error
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=137102 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear Daniel Brown, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 136203] LibreOffice is launching slowly with all Interface Languages installed (taking while until splash screen appears)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=136203 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear Telesto, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135555] type 'struct Document' violates the C++ One Definition Rule
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear Hillwood Yang, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134340] Wrong orientation in print preview of printer dialog for label printer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134340 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Hans-Peter Jansen, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134057] Crash in: sclo.dll if corrected a wrong DDE expression (Matrix-Formula)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134057 --- Comment #10 from QA Administrators --- Dear Marco, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 134003] Vtablefactory violates W^X security principle
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134003 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear Andi Kleen, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132769] Different Font name/font size overlap when moving the cursor around paragraphs written in different fonts/sizes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132769 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear fogexi4163, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132718] gallery: Shapes didn't use styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132718 --- Comment #11 from QA Administrators --- Dear andreas_k, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132715] Disabled and locked down configuration items can be "runtime enabled"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132715 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Ronny Standtke, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132148] Download and Install of libreoofice 6.4 fails to execute after installation of .DEB
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132148 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Oliver Bailey, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131734] libreoffice attempts to recover read-only documents
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131734 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear Marco van Hulten, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131687] Windows open in wrong display when used both through ssh and locally by the same user
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131687 --- Comment #6 from QA Administrators --- Dear fabien.perdu, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130401] Calc periodically causes high CPU load, even when window is minified
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130401 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear ChrisK, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 130246] Random lines appear on large text when hardware acceleration is enabled (Linux, not with VCL gen)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=130246 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Kuba Orlik, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128591] ODBC/SQL Server/datetimeoffset column breaks form creation wizard
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128591 --- Comment #8 from QA Administrators --- Dear Bill Stewart, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128915] Installation error - GetTempFileNameW failed
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128915 --- Comment #7 from QA Administrators --- Dear xarx, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 128040] Slide Deck with Show Grid enabled does not show properly when uploaded to LibreOffice Online
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128040 --- Comment #4 from QA Administrators --- Dear Italo Vignoli, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126077] Messy/garbage Code message when adding an extension via unopkg
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126077 --- Comment #12 from QA Administrators --- Dear Olivier R., This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 122805] When loolwsd starts in a NextCloud environment, a zombie process is always created.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122805 --- Comment #5 from QA Administrators --- Dear dt64, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 117800] [FreeTDS][SQL Server]Incorrect syntax near 'Database-Name'.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117800 --- Comment #17 from QA Administrators --- Dear Tobiasz Karoń, This bug has been in NEEDINFO status with no change for at least 6 months. Please provide the requested information as soon as possible and mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED. Due to regular bug tracker maintenance, if the bug is still in NEEDINFO status with no change in 30 days the QA team will close the bug as INSUFFICIENTDATA due to lack of needed information. For more information about our NEEDINFO policy please read the wiki located here: https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/Bugzilla/Fields/Status/NEEDINFO If you have already provided the requested information, please mark the bug as UNCONFIRMED so that the QA team knows that the bug is ready to be confirmed. Thank you for helping us make LibreOffice even better for everyone! Warm Regards, QA Team MassPing-NeedInfo-Ping -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149237] New: SingleSignOn unsuccessful loop
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149237 Bug ID: 149237 Summary: SingleSignOn unsuccessful loop Product: LibreOffice Version: 3.3.0 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Documentation Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: flywi...@gmail.com CC: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Main_Page Log in https://auth.documentfoundation.org/saml/singleSignOn?SAMLRequest=pZJRT8IwFIX%2FytL3sVFAZgMkCCGSoBCYmvhiSncHjV07ezvRf2%2FZMOKDvPjQNLm959zvnnSAvFAlG1dur9fwVgG64KNQGln9MCSV1cxwlMg0LwCZE2wzvlsw2opZaY0zwihyJrms4IhgnTSaBPPpkLwk7X63l3Ro0rlq%2B5O0hUiyLM5ph25ptwvxdS62eSL6nASPYNErh8QbeTliBXONjmvnSzGlYdwLaSeNY9aOWa%2F%2FTIKp30Zq7mrV3rkSWRRxv2orM6IqQLvcVDqrG1rG7qLjAhFKvVOwkTu99Jjjb%2BKJ0eg1dgP2XQp4WC9%2BPA%2FyVf7pKYtSQe1cmKxS0Cr35WlSc9OQC6yr6XT25K1IsDoleyN15nEuh7ptmpDdpukqXC03KRkNjsasDsmO%2Fo9ZgOO%2BmZ9TDqLzGYPmI917uvl0ZZQUn8HM2IK7y%2FDHiszCvG5lznKN0tP54JUyh4kF7mBInK2ARKNm5O%2FvOvoC=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.documentfoundation.org%2FSpecial%3APluggableAuthLogin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2F04%2Fxmldsig-more%23rsa-sha256=DstBOwFLzxZsJZ2w3Qh8HessYb0%2BVuyD4SLxn%2BrX7Njhdz5lgtIbTmj2UHe2szfUcYI4fY2Xq1XCvaWVfx6owj%2FWRS7eQtD5%2F6UYWeAjJeipjQlY6FhMDfDOSSp2yMVOTGhkga0WRfk2nYOL76lwRbMDO0Mht%2BrMwJ2pWioX3B3l4tmzWseHpnbaQ3bt%2FGqEhRYON1nKh6jnNI6YMk3Zuz3JtC%2B%2B1CVRRtExDJb%2BOB0cQqppvkizfVwOOvTE3khP4v8FNHgW%2FEW3LSXxNp03RpIepH2GI9p4p0Yqy2Y3Ld4pgioI3zZdQzkyV0Taz92InToKiLPx62%2BGrj5zd5e42A%3D%3D https://auth.documentfoundation.org/saml/singleSignOn?SAMLRequest=pZLLbsIwEEV%2FJfI%2B5AEUYoVIFISKRAuCtJW6qRxnAKuOnXqcPv6%2BJlCVLsqmK0vje%2B%2BcGU2KrJI1HTd2r9bw2gBa76OSCmn7MSKNUVQzFEgVqwCp5XQzvl3QuBPS2miruZbkzHLZwRDBWKEV8ebTEXlOiiFERZIUxdWA9bZF0iu3Q84GUdjlUdnlPOG9QX8QhkPiPYBB5xwRF%2BTsiA3MFVqmrCuFceyHfT%2Fu5mFIo4hGvSfiTd00QjHbuvbW1kiDgLlRO6XmTQXKbnWjylbQ0WYXHAYIUKidhI3YqaXDHH8TT7RC5zEbMG%2BCw%2F168ZP5Ll7En5miqiW0yZUuGwmdel%2BfOh3f2Gcc22o%2BnT26KOKtTpu9Fqp0OJeXWhxFSG%2FyfOWvlpucZOkhmLZLMtn%2FMSuwzInZOWUanPdIj4d05%2Bjm05WWgn96M20qZi%2FDHyqi9LetlFrDFApH5xYvpX6fGGAWRsSaBkiQHVv%2BPtfsCw%3D%3D=https%3A%2F%2Fwiki.documentfoundation.org%2FSpecial%3APluggableAuthLogin=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.w3.org%2F2001%2F04%2Fxmldsig-more%23rsa-sha256=Y8Eez2AH0mF6wrx4%2BPxCA0vVZPysoRZyGouA%2Bh9oAgPYHKNRtEGmRQnn8ijnQqAgUlWk1HdXQeuiHSZ%2BJCzF49x7ktz7G2Y5A1ccI17IAIg7ieC6xdrO0bFCBhWICgbuF8Bpq4i7ACn3ddAGqB5%2B%2Finh95b4gnsV%2FXEeKeXInuiZF6R6iTDKk3wz2BzDZZS6Wu9iyWNTXsdYIhEMDx2ZpCf%2FM6iDWhdMuxW9kBpUQREylMHIQVBb9Rjt32r2prKZWBEAUwarkNkZMZIKmvhFyPi8TO9fJbP8eGYURtsWyCYNMkeqKy4m0q%2BBQWl3DS3W%2BYDjdCx9r20XNed%2BXqpJZg%3D%3D This has been ongoing for months. Workaround: Use New Private Window in browser Brave is up to date Version 1.38.119 Chromium: 101.0.4951.67 (Official Build) (64-bit) CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19043; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-AU (en_AU); UI: en-GB Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149236] CALC / MACRO graphics of a sheet messed up after inserting a sheet in a lower index number
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149236 Philippe Lévi changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|UI |CALC / MACRO graphics of a ||sheet messed up after ||inserting a sheet in a ||lower index number -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149207] FILESAVE background images change
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149207 --- Comment #5 from maximilian-schind...@gmx.net --- Created attachment 180307 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180307=edit sample 2 Here is a more simple test file. The image of page one got overwritten by the image of page 9. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149236] New: UI
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149236 Bug ID: 149236 Summary: UI Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.3.2.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: minor Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: phili...@quarta.com.br Created attachment 180306 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180306=edit spreadsheet with 2 sheets and a macro Main using macro. adding a sheet (Calc) at any place but at the end may mess up diagrams of "next" sheet. In the example I join. The macro (Main) copy a sheet with 4 diagrams to a new one (Test), then create a new sheet (Concentrateur) before the last copied (Test). Comparing "Test" with "Modèle Séquence" on the "Test" sheet diagrams are not at the right position and 3 is missing. Note that if you move "Test" sheet the diagrams positions are ok! The same if you close and open the spreadsheet. Before creating the last sheet "Concentrateur" the positions are ok too ! Copy of the macro Sub Main dim const nomFeuilleDest = "test" dim const nomFeuilleModeleSequence = "Modèle Séquence" dim const nomFeuilleConcentrateur = "Concentrateur" with thisComponent if .sheets.hasByName( nomFeuilleDest) then _ .sheets.removeByName( nomFeuilleDest) .sheets.copyByName( nomFeuilleModeleSequence, nomFeuilleDest, .sheets.Count) if not .sheets.hasByName(nomFeuilleConcentrateur) then _ .sheets.insertNewByName(nomFeuilleConcentrateur, 2) ' NOTE the "2" end with msgbox "Done !" End Sub Version: 7.3.2.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 49f2b1bff42cfccbd8f788c8dc32c1c309559be0 CPU threads: 2; OS: Windows 6.1 Service Pack 1 Build 7601; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: fr-FR (pt_BR); UI: pt-BR Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149229] Installing Libre Office Breaks Other Tools
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149229 --- Comment #3 from David Kennedy --- Hi, pip is the python installer for python which comes standard with lots of Linux distros. Granted autorecon isn't but I don't think it should be touching anything related to any of these to be honest. Afterwards I did install an older version of Libre via the downloaded gzip which worked okay but the apt install still seems to cause issues. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149229] Installing Libre Office Breaks Other Tools
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149229 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr --- Comment #2 from Julien Nabet --- Reading https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kali_Linux, Kali is a Debian-derived distrib. I use Debian testing and when I do: - apt-file search pip or - apt-file search autorecon it finds nothing. How did you install these both tools? If you also use sudo apt-get install or graphic equivalent, it may be problem of the distrib. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document (gen, gtk3 and kf5 renderings)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Crash on print preview of |Crash on print preview of |master document (kf5?) |master document (gen, gtk3 ||and kf5 renderings) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document (kf5?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords||haveBacktrace Ever confirmed|0 |1 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document (kf5?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 --- Comment #5 from Julien Nabet --- Created attachment 180305 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180305=edit bt with debug symbols (gen) Idem with gen rendering. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document (kf5?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 --- Comment #4 from Julien Nabet --- Created attachment 180304 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180304=edit bt with debug symbols (kf5) I got the same with kf5 rendering except logs: warn:legacy.osl:22612:22612:sw/source/core/access/accpage.cxx:53: bSelected out of sync -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document (kf5?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr --- Comment #3 from Julien Nabet --- Created attachment 180303 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180303=edit bt with debug symbols On pc Debian x86-64 with master sources updated today +gtk3 rendering, I got a crash. I noticed these logs: warn:legacy.osl:22612:22612:sw/source/core/access/accpage.cxx:53: bSelected out of sync warn:legacy.osl:22612:22612:sw/source/core/access/accpage.cxx:53: bSelected out of sync I also noticed that if I toggle off the navigator (which displays automatically), I don't reproduce the crash. However when closing preview, the navigator comes back. Then, same thing, either I try to launch preview by letting the navigator opened and it crashes or I launch it after having closed the navigator again. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (see comment 67)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501 --- Comment #104 from John Mills --- (In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #103) > (In reply to Pedro from comment #102) > > * KOffice - menus & toolbars (abandoned in 2015 but you said past 15 years) DEAD > * AbiWord - menus & toolbars (although it's just a Writer alternative) Basically on life support and not an office suite, just a word processor > * Calligra - toolbar and vertical-tabbed sidebar Linux Only > * NeoOffice - menus & toolbars Mac Only > > and the only one on that list with tabs seems to be OnlyOffice. If you count > commercial office suites, you do find more ribbons (SoftMaker, OfficeSuite, > WPS), but then there's also iWork with its minimalist interface (I believe > they're not hiding tabs but feel free to correct me). So, with the > commercial ones, you still only get to, say, around half. Not "every" > alternative". This is factually not correct, iWorks is not commercial in the sense I can not purchase a copy, it is Mac only and comes for free with your system if you need it. How is that half of commercial office suites on your list? Every other defaults to a tabbed interface and there are certainly others you have not added in your list such as the excellent Korean Hancom office. > > Furthermore, the users whose experience you want > > to defend actually do have problems in adapting from a Ribbon UI to the > > Standard Toolbar. > > There is some adaptation, granted; but as discussed above - the adaptation > is important and beneficial. What is the essential part? That you force a user to 'unlearn' everything they know about an office suite interface? Where is the benefit, could you expound upon this assertion? > > Just go to any comment section of a LibO release to notice that. > > The Standard UI is a fossil from a different computing era. > > Well, it seems that statistically, that's not actually the case; and you've > only based this statement on the statistical claim. I would say based upon your previous statement it is your statistical claim in error and not that from Pedro. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131167] FILEOPEN DOCX: orientation and value of page number in footer are off
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131167 --- Comment #6 from Gerald Pfeifer --- Still there: Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha1+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: b2467d6c7af988f8ed4e090ebf9472be6c84fb06 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.17; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-US (en_US.UTF-8); UI: en-US -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document (kf5?)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Crash on print preview of |Crash on print preview of |master document |master document (kf5?) CC||ilmari.lauhakangas@libreoff ||ice.org --- Comment #2 from Telesto --- No repro on Windows Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: cdf8e971d5d46df4bcab35a99c4254df9459213f CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (nl_NL); UI: en-GB Calc: CL Jumbo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149234] Combining anchor "to character" with "from bottom by ... to Line of Text" produces invalid ODF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149234 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9235 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142875] FILEOPEN DOCX Shapes vertically aligned to line imported incorrectly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142875 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9235 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149235] New: Wrong vertical image position for proportional line spacing for images anchored "to character"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149235 Bug ID: 149235 Summary: Wrong vertical image position for proportional line spacing for images anchored "to character" Product: LibreOffice Version: Inherited From OOo Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rb.hensc...@t-online.de Created attachment 180302 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180302=edit Examples and descriptions of the vertical position problem Open attached document. It contains examples and explanations of the problem. In short: An image anchored "to character" and vertical positioned with "from bottom" to "Line of Text" uses a different reference line for "Line of Text" when the line spacing is "Proportional" than in cases "single", "fixed" and "leading". I expect, that the reference line is always the same. In fixing/changing the behavior you need to consider, that currently the setting "Line of Text" produces invalid ODF, see bug 149234. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 108198] [META] ODF export is unsuitable or invalid XML
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149234 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149234 [Bug 149234] Combining anchor "to character" with "from bottom by ... to Line of Text" produces invalid ODF -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149234] Combining anchor "to character" with "from bottom by ... to Line of Text" produces invalid ODF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149234 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||2875 Blocks||108198 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=108198 [Bug 108198] [META] ODF export is unsuitable or invalid XML -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 142875] FILEOPEN DOCX Shapes vertically aligned to line imported incorrectly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=142875 Regina Henschel changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9234 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149233] Crash in: SfxItemSet::Get(unsigned short, bool)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149233 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE Priority|high|medium Status|NEW |RESOLVED Keywords|bibisectRequest, regression | --- Comment #3 from Telesto --- *** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 149184 *** -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 126152] [META] Images-TIFF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=126152 Bug 126152 depends on bug 131199, which changed state. Bug 131199 Summary: TIFF import filters missing https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131199 What|Removed |Added Status|ASSIGNED|RESOLVED Resolution|--- |FIXED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149233] Crash in: SfxItemSet::Get(unsigned short, bool)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149233 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Version|7.1.3.2 release |7.2.0.3 rc Keywords||bibisectRequest, regression CC||tele...@surfxs.nl Priority|medium |high --- Comment #2 from Telesto --- Also in Version: 7.2.1.0.0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 8fdbb8aed1b48734a717d5f98ada566de7204605 CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: nl-NL (nl_NL); UI: en-US Calc: CL not in 7.1 oldest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149234] New: Combining anchor "to character" with "from bottom by ... to Line of Text" produces invalid ODF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149234 Bug ID: 149234 Summary: Combining anchor "to character" with "from bottom by ... to Line of Text" produces invalid ODF Product: LibreOffice Version: Inherited From OOo Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Windows (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: rb.hensc...@t-online.de Created attachment 180301 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180301=edit Example and comments of "Line of Text" alignment Open attached document. It contains an example and a description of the problem. In short: The vertical alignment of images with following settings in the UI produces invalid ODF: Anchor "to character" Vertical position "From bottom" by "5mm" to "Line of Text". An additional problem is, that Word interprets the "by" value different from LibreOffice. Further problems will follow in a separate bug report. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149233] Crash in: SfxItemSet::Get(unsigned short, bool)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149233 Telesto changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #1 from Telesto --- 1. Open the attached file 2. Delete the footer 3. Save -> crash Doesn't crash when simply saving.. at least for me Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: cdf8e971d5d46df4bcab35a99c4254df9459213f CPU threads: 4; OS: Windows 6.3 Build 9600; UI render: Skia/Raster; VCL: win Locale: en-US (nl_NL); UI: en-GB Calc: CL Jumbo -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (see comment 67)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501 --- Comment #103 from Eyal Rozenberg --- (In reply to Pedro from comment #102) > I assume you haven't used other office suites in the past 15 years, because > since then every LibreOffice alternative uses a tabbed UI similar to the > Ribbon UI from MS Office. Actually, most LO alternatives (as listed on Wikipedia) _don't_ use a tabbed interface: * KOffice - menus & toolbars (abandoned in 2015 but you said past 15 years) * AbiWord - menus & toolbars (although it's just a Writer alternative) * Calligra - toolbar and vertical-tabbed sidebar * NeoOffice - menus & toolbars and the only one on that list with tabs seems to be OnlyOffice. If you count commercial office suites, you do find more ribbons (SoftMaker, OfficeSuite, WPS), but then there's also iWork with its minimalist interface (I believe they're not hiding tabs but feel free to correct me). So, with the commercial ones, you still only get to, say, around half. Not "every" alternative". > Furthermore, the users whose experience you want > to defend actually do have problems in adapting from a Ribbon UI to the > Standard Toolbar. There is some adaptation, granted; but as discussed above - the adaptation is important and beneficial. > Just go to any comment section of a LibO release to notice that. That, of course, would be a biased sample. Users do not post "I just thought you should know I don't have a problem with menus". > The Standard UI is a fossil from a different computing era. Well, it seems that statistically, that's not actually the case; and you've only based this statement on the statistical claim. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 88476] Justify changes cell height from 0, 53 to 0, 61 cm
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=88476 --- Comment #13 from rob...@prino.org --- As andréb already mentioned in Comment 4, this *IS* a major bug, and needs to be fixed. Layout is fundamental, especially when data is printed! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149103] libre office writer, delete image or image frame causes freeze & crash
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149103 raal changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO CC||r...@post.cz Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #4 from raal --- Hello, Thank you for filing the bug. Please send us a sample document, as this makes it easier for us to verify the bug. I have set the bug's status to 'NEEDINFO', so please do change it back to 'UNCONFIRMED' once you have attached a document. (Please note that the attachment will be public, remove any sensitive information before attaching it.) How can I eliminate confidential data from a sample document? https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FAQ#How_can_I_eliminate_confidential_data_from_a_sample_document.3F Thank you -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149233] Crash in: SfxItemSet::Get(unsigned short, bool)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149233 vladankud...@gmail.com changed: What|Removed |Added OS|All |Windows (All) Hardware|All |x86-64 (AMD64) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149233] New: Crash in: SfxItemSet::Get(unsigned short, bool)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149233 Bug ID: 149233 Summary: Crash in: SfxItemSet::Get(unsigned short,bool) Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.1.3.2 release Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: vladankud...@gmail.com Created attachment 180300 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180300=edit document-to-save This bug was filed from the crash reporting server and is br-b84529e4-4324-42e1-ba49-8e099264a24b. = LibreOffice crashed when saving the following document. Version: 7.3.3.2 (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19044; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: cs-CZ (cs_CZ); UI: cs-CZ Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149105] Loss of formatting in tables
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149105 raal changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 CC||r...@post.cz Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145238] bug in vertical Text orientation in cell
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145238 --- Comment #9 from HM --- Comment on attachment 180299 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180299 see bug in new profile Hi in non RTL interface this bug smaller bug only see in Vertical text (ctl) bottom to top if write non English text(characters). thanks -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145238] bug in vertical Text orientation in cell
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145238 --- Comment #8 from HM --- Created attachment 180299 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180299=edit see bug in new profile -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143381] Calc hangs if properties panel is resized
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143381 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|1 |0 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230
--- Comment #3 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #1)
> So IMO it's natural ... etc. etc. ... no "bold"/"italic" and so on
For a rather spartan example, but which take this approach at least partially,
have a look at the LyX editor of LaTeX documents. It calls its approach "what
you see is what you mean"; you mostly just can't apply direct formatting -
although it is not oriented towards customizing styles.
https://www.lyx.org/Screenshots
(I'm not saying we should adopt any of this.)
> I suppose that it would be reasonable to try to reuse the existing
> pre-defined style set (I focus on Writer now) to provide a set of controls
> that would suggest to apply *syntactic* meaning to text, where currently
> similar controls allow to apply direct formatting. They could suggest to
> *emphasize* text (= apply Emphasis style by default); or "create citation";
> or "make it a heading". (By the way, many Web tools already suggest similar
> concepts - like buttons making some text "quotation" or "source code", so
> possibly that could be partially familiar to users.)
Indeed, the default style set is under-utilized. Its presentation is currently
only a hint of something which you might want to use.
I would also expect there to be UI which is "inviting" to the user to share
information about aspects of their intended structure.
One possible example would be numbering. Instead of the UI focusing on how a
number/bullet and indentation would look on the current paragraph (which is the
focus of both the buttons and the dialog right now), the focus would be the
user telling LO about a list that they want to have: Whether is it a one-off
list or whether they want to have recurring lists of the same kind; whether it
is contiguous or interspersed with other content; whether list items are
no-paragraph, a single-paragraph or multi-paragraph (do we have an open issue
about this feature?); what name should this kind of list be given (= the
style); whether it is single-level or multi-level; and on with features such as
association with paragraph styles. This could happen in an "add list" wizard.
And we could have a "convert to list" wizard. If those were the buttons rather
than "slap a number onto it and don't ask any questions", you could say we have
moved the UI to be more style-focused.
This makes me think of how, when examining existing styles (default or
non-default), we are not presented with their raison d'etre, or if you will,
the "elevator pitch" for using them. They're just names in a list (or tree) in
a sidebar. Guidance on how to format with styles should also be more
immediately accessible (in the sense of "Are you trying to do X? Let us explain
how you can do it the LO way" and such).
> and other more advanced tools.
Perhaps a style search, which in addition the the style name, would also search
some paragraph(s) of explanatory text about when and what for the style is to
be used.
> There need to be a way to apply direct formatting - but those controls need
> to only appear on explicit request ("Format selection directly", maybe
> showing some toolbar that would close automatically after use).
Or perhaps with a global toggle between "Style-oriented mode" and
"Direct-formatting-oriented mode".
> I hope that the correct naming of the controls
This is important. But the button design would be even more challenging, since
the level of abstraction buttons represents would now typically rise.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149104] Fails to paste images into Writer
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149104 --- Comment #2 from Shriram_N --- I tried copying an image and it worked fine. couldnt reproduce the bug. Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha1+ (x64) / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 09822cf77cdbe32b03553cd05154100b5f2591d0 CPU threads: 12; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 22000; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL: win Locale: en-US (en_US); UI: en-US Calc: CL -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149216] Draw pdf import: wrong width of imported text boxes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149216 --- Comment #4 from V Stuart Foote --- Yes, MS Word 2019 does a fair job structuring its PDF import. And it saves that out to functional ODF Text document .ODT if you need. At the moment, Justin Luth's work on bug 118370 to cleanup LibreOffice Text boxes and provide a means to merge a selection of multiple Text boxes into a new single Text box on the Draw canvas is a functional, if manual process--via UNO .uno:TextCombine The resulting Text Box does not resize on the Draw canvas to match margin layout of other imported PDF elements, but the resulting Text Box can be resized as needed to manually compose the Draw document. There is no corresponding command when the PDF is filter imported to Writer or to Impress. Not clear implementing the same UNO TextCombine command for TextBox in Writer is even feasible. More general handling for extracting text runs from PDF is open as bug 32249, but in sum the LibreOffice filter offerings and object framework are not suited to parsing PDF layout back into meaningful editable ODF documents with acceptable fidelity. The PDF format is a presentation format--it is not intended to be "edited". -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230 Eyal Rozenberg changed: What|Removed |Added CC||eyalr...@gmx.com, ||page74010...@yahoo.fr --- Comment #2 from Eyal Rozenberg --- I didn't want to sidetrack the discussion on bug 135501, so I did not answer ajlittoz there, but I do have a few points to make about it... * The "usefulness of an application" and the quality of its UI are not distinct things. The User Interface is how you _use_ the application. If it is _useful_, then its amenable to _use_. So a good UI _is_ part of the objective of LO. By analogy, a good handle grip is part of what makes a hammer useful - even if, eventually, a hammer is about forceful blows, not about gripping. So, when producing a hammer, it is definitely part of the objective to give it a good handle grip. > Style usage should be encouraged by all means No. It should be encouraged by some means - but not to the extent of making it difficult to create a simple document with direct formatting, or to make direct-formatting changes to an existing document. > M$ Office-like UIs are wrong Do you mean ribbons? > they lead to the "intuitive application control" syndrome Never heard of that, but - I think I disagree. Ribbons make it clear that you do _not_ control the application and, instead, are spoon-fed a subset of its features. > they encourage direct formatting because the alternative style control is not > that obvious The main ribbon in MS Office has styles at the center of it, plus you have the Style bar. There's room for improvement, but styles are quite visible. > being immediately accessible How are ribbons more "immediately accessible" than menus? Or do you mean the single, main ribbon > In my point of view, LO doesn't offer yet a full original style-oriented UI. This is the interesting part. I'd love to see some ideas for that. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149139] Calculation with time duration is not simple, it is in Mac Numbers.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149139 --- Comment #7 from LeroyG --- Sorry! I send my comment before reading all posts. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149139] Calculation with time duration is not simple, it is in Mac Numbers.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149139 LeroyG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED Ever confirmed|1 |0 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149213] Cell's borders are not shown
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149213 Martin Srdoš changed: What|Removed |Added CC||l.lu...@collabora.com Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected --- Comment #5 from Martin Srdoš --- Bisection result: 27bfa28d72ffd134e5844473d339b8b5f7c28bb6 is the first bad commit commit 27bfa28d72ffd134e5844473d339b8b5f7c28bb6 Author: Norbert Thiebaud Date: Thu Apr 28 17:24:55 2022 -0700 source sha:9e2d48b9e04f7ea895fb095699c32ed8a44eb129 source sha:9e2d48b9e04f7ea895fb095699c32ed8a44eb129 Adding Luboš to the CC list. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149139] Calculation with time duration is not simple, it is in Mac Numbers.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149139 LeroyG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO Ever confirmed|0 |1 --- Comment #6 from LeroyG --- Excuse my ignorance: I have never used A0 as a reference. If cells are formatted as M:SS, with SUM(A1:A8) I get 42:56. You must look if the cell content is formatted as text (i.e., '7:23, or automatically aligns to the left, or with Ctrl+F8 the numbers remains black). LibreOffice 7.2.3.2 on Linux. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149118] SPAM
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149118 LeroyG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED Product|cppunit |LibreOffice Component|General |deletionRequest -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149118] SPAM
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149118 LeroyG changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED Summary|screenage |SPAM Resolution|--- |INVALID -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230
--- Comment #1 from Mike Kaganski ---
I'm sorry for a wall of text; I'm not good in sketches; and IMO what follows
would be best presented in words, giving some ideas and reasons instead of
images. Here is what I think about a possible direction of such an UI.
One of the powers of styles is their customizability and flexibility; but that
is one of the biggest challenges in creating a UI that would both promote use
of styles, and at the same time be usable even for newbies.
Direct formatting talks in "static" terms; "Caladea" font, or 12 pt, or "Bold"
is ~same on any system and in any application (we don't dive into what "bold"
*might* mean for a really advanced typography lover). But what does "Style X"
mean? It depends on a document, maybe on template, or even on a software
version (when we might change the defaults).
OTOH, there's no more "natural" place to look for most used tools (at least for
most users on this Earth) than on the top of the application window, the place
where most UIs have something like menu, or toolbars, or notebookbar, etc. -
the areas usually packed by default with direct formatting elements. So IMO
it's natural to try to create a UI that would resemble current existing UI,
just having individual controls doing conceptually different tasks.
The new controls need to drive user attention to the structural, semantical
meaning of the change ("formatting") they do, rather than on the resulting
look. That should be done using *names* of the controls - the names need to
allow user to grasp the idea how that would look like (at least by default), so
that new user would still realize what to press, and yet need to not mention
the specific appearance details (no "bold"/"italic" and so on).
I suppose that it would be reasonable to try to reuse the existing pre-defined
style set (I focus on Writer now) to provide a set of controls that would
suggest to apply *syntactic* meaning to text, where currently similar controls
allow to apply direct formatting. They could suggest to *emphasize* text (=
apply Emphasis style by default); or "create citation"; or "make it a heading".
(By the way, many Web tools already suggest similar concepts - like buttons
making some text "quotation" or "source code", so possibly that could be
partially familiar to users.) The controls need to have a way to immediately
*customize* the look of the applied style (= open style settings dialog); and
also to define another style associated with the control (so that users could
decide to use own set of styles with the same buttons, where they decide to not
use pre-defined styles for some reason). Some of such controls have a natural
need to have selection over variants (Heading N). The set of the controls need
to allow creating wide range of documents - but indeed, there can't be a truly
all-encompassing UI, so there would be no need to pack it with every possible
style. Whenever the user needs more styles (categories of styles) that are
provided by the top panels, they need (and likely are ready for) style manager
(F11) and other more advanced tools.
There need to be a way to apply direct formatting - but those controls need to
only appear on explicit request ("Format selection directly", maybe showing
some toolbar that would close automatically after use).
I hope that the correct naming of the controls that user uses since the start,
every day, suggesting them to think what the text will mean as a result of a
button press, could shift the focus gradually from the DF-centric to semantical
meaning, allowing natural pre-adaptation to acceptance of styles and their
conscious use (beyond pressing the toolbar buttons).
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 143381] Calc hangs if properties panel is resized
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143381 --- Comment #8 from Tim Anderson --- Updated to 7.3.3.2 and unfortunately I still get the problem. Tim -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 63722] FILEOPEN: Loads only first page/image of multipage TIFF
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=63722 --- Comment #14 from Caolán McNamara --- We do actually import the full set of images, the UI isn't great around this and we don't export the way the original reporter has in mind. But FWIW in impress, insert image and insert this example, ensure it's selected in the ui, then insert, media, animated image and pick the "apply objects individually" button and at the top of this dialog there is a spinbutton which can be used to cycle through the images contained in the .tiff. (This is clearly intended for old-school animated gifs) Why this UI is in impress only and not even draw I don't know, and how to use that dialog effectively is also a bit of a mystery, but we are reading all the images in a multi-image tiff so its not a failing of the import filter. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149219] File → New → Labels: Wrong German translation of appearing dialog, differs to LO-help
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149219 --- Comment #1 from himajin100...@gmail.com --- https://translations.documentfoundation.org/translate/libo_ui-master/swmessages/de/?checksum=b9d237f0f3aea093=has%3Acontext+%22labeldialog%7CLabelDialog%22_by=-priority%2Cposition https://translations.documentfoundation.org/translate/libo_ui-master/swmessages/de/?offset=1=has%3Acontext+%22labeldialog%7Clabels%22_by=-priority%2Cposition= https://translations.documentfoundation.org/translate/libo_help-master/textsharedguide/de/?q=labels.xhp_by=-priority%2Cposition=6 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 131199] TIFF import filters missing
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131199 Caolán McNamara changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |caol...@redhat.com |desktop.org | --- Comment #15 from Caolán McNamara --- I got something now which seems to basically work for the last case: https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/134734 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149232] Vertically resizing image in Calc does not resize and moves image to top
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149232 --- Comment #1 from Some guy --- Possibly related: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148208 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149232] New: Vertically resizing image in Calc does not resize and moves image to top
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149232 Bug ID: 149232 Summary: Vertically resizing image in Calc does not resize and moves image to top Product: LibreOffice Version: 7.2.6.2 release Hardware: x86-64 (AMD64) OS: Linux (All) Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Calc Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: ffsidontwantanacco...@mailnesia.com Description: Intermittent: Attempting to vertically or diagonally resize an image (BMP) imported into Calc does not work. Instead image moves offscreen (to the top?) Steps to Reproduce: 1. Import BMP image by drag and drop 2. Use Calc normally for some time 3. Select image so that corners shows green squares to resize 4. Try to drag any bottom or top corner (ie to resize vertically or diagonally) Actual Results: (Intermittent) Image does not resize and is moved. I suspect it may move to the top of the document. Expected Results: Image should resize and show current preview of resize according to current mouse drag position Reproducible: Sometimes User Profile Reset: No Additional Info: Bug is intermittent, but once it occurs it persists reliably until LibreOffice is killed. Opening/ closing document or deleting and reimporting image do not help. WM: KDE Plasma 5.22.5 Qt: 5.15.2 Version: 7.2.6.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 20(Build:2) CPU threads: 12; OS: Linux 5.13; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: en-GB (en_GB.UTF-8); UI: en-GB Ubuntu package version: 1:7.2.6-0ubuntu0.21.10.1 Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149216] Draw pdf import: wrong width of imported text boxes
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149216 --- Comment #3 from Yan Pas --- OK, I see, I wish it could edit PDFs like MS Word and google docs do (yes, this document was imported in Draw, not Writer). Mark it as invalid if the behaviour is expected then. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (see comment 67)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501 --- Comment #102 from Pedro --- (In reply to PeeWee from comment #95) > Being a serious user of LibreOffice, I believe that changing the default UI > from Standard to Notebookbar would be detrimental to users’ experience of a > very good office software package. The Standard UI is very similar to other > office software packages, so a new user to LibreOffice would have no problem > in getting to grips with LibreOffice. I assume you haven't used other office suites in the past 15 years, because since then every LibreOffice alternative uses a tabbed UI similar to the Ribbon UI from MS Office. Furthermore, the users whose experience you want to defend actually do have problems in adapting from a Ribbon UI to the Standard Toolbar. Just go to any comment section of a LibO release to notice that. The Standard UI is a fossil from a different computing era. > I find that ALL the UI variants that are available for LibreOffice are not > as good as the Standard UI. With writing the user guides for Impress and > Draw, I had to check the UI variants for one of the chapters. Not impressed. > > Standard UI is the best. Could you please provide input and feedback on how to improve the Tabbed UI then? I would assume that someone from the documentation team wouldn't want to change from the Standard UI because then you would have increased work to re-write the documentation. Thus I do understand why you would consider it best. Not best for the users of office suites though. And I write this, knowing full well that the Tabbed UI still isn't ready to be the default while it does not support extensions among other blockers. Also, the Notebookbar is the framework to develop different UI variants. The Tabbed UI is the one we are talking about here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 148774] Autofilter confusing input search with Standard filter (UX)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148774 Cathrine changed: What|Removed |Added CC||cathrinepam...@gmail.com --- Comment #3 from Cathrine --- Created attachment 180297 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180297=edit 148774_retest Steps i followed: 1.I have opened Calc 2.Filled Column A 3.Applied Filter on Column A 4.Then move the mouse down to Filter by Condition 5.Standard Filter is available under Filter by Condition 6.search box on Standard filter is also working fine. 7."Search items" text box which is next to Filter By Condition is working fine. Kindly,refer the attachment 148774_retest Thank you for reporting the bug. I can not reproduce the bug in Version: 7.4.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community Build ID: 465c3ad95059f0efa13c8027f7383c4d20a5b2ff CPU threads: 2; OS: Linux 5.4; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3 Locale: en-IN (en_IN); UI: en-US Calc: threaded -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132864] Harmony in position settings of different objects
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132864 --- Comment #19 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Dieter from comment #9) > Since we haven't a guideline for anchoring ... it is very difficult > to assess for users and also for people in QA, if a behaviour is expected > or not ... So an overview about anchoring would reduce work and would > make QA more efficient. A few suggestions to first responses to "anchoring" reports about objects not positioned as expected. 1. Check to see if positioning options have been provided in the bug report. If not, then NEEDINFO to get them. 2. If the OP does not report what the person is trying to accomplish, then use NEEDINFO to find out. Many options are available, with remarkable capabilities, but it is necessary to evaluate what a person is trying to accomplish and what positioning options have been chosen to achieve that goal. It is possible that a person has chosen the wrong option (or misunderstands how the option is supposed to operate) in relation to the goal. (In principle: https://help.libreoffice.org/7.4/en-US/text/swriter/01/05060100.html gives full information about positioning options). (meanwhile, FTR -- there are several inaccuracies in that page (e.g., bug 148901, bug 148902, bug 148903, bug 148904, bug 148486, bug 148483) and some implementation bugs in some of the positioning options). 3. If a person starts with the idea that "anchor only" is sufficient for positioning, then it will be impossible to communicate meaningfully or to make reliable STR. There are interactions between "what positioning is desired" and what positioning options are chosen, which is why it is necessary to know the two pieces indicated in the first two points. I believe steps 1 and 2 may help OP and QA to direct their attention and communication in a way that will reduce the need to send queries to Design Team. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 Olivier Hallot changed: What|Removed |Added Hardware|All |x86-64 (AMD64) Version|unspecified |7.3.3.2 release OS|All |Linux (All) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 --- Comment #1 from Olivier Hallot --- Created attachment 180296 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180296=edit Chapter file -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149231] New: Crash on print preview of master document
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 Bug ID: 149231 Summary: Crash on print preview of master document Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: medium Component: Writer Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: olivier.hal...@libreoffice.org Blocks: 107805 Created attachment 180295 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=180295=edit Master document The following crash occurred when opening the print preview of the attached document. https://crashreport.libreoffice.org/stats/crash_details/a0d65340-b854-424e-bdda-de7d5e6dedc6 Open the master document, accept update of links, click Print Preview Results: crash Version: 7.3.3.2 / LibreOffice Community Build ID: d1d0ea68f081ee2800a922cac8f79445e4603348 CPU threads: 8; OS: Linux 5.15; UI render: default; VCL: kf5 (cairo+xcb) Locale: en-US (pt_BR.UTF-8); UI: en-US Calc: threaded Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107805 [Bug 107805] [META] Writer master document issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 107805] [META] Writer master document issues
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107805 Olivier Hallot changed: What|Removed |Added Depends on||149231 Referenced Bugs: https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149231 [Bug 149231] Crash on print preview of master document -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (see comment 67)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501 --- Comment #101 from Buovjaga --- Design task created for making the style story better: bug 149230. From now on I will point all new designers to that task until we hit gold. (In reply to PeeWee from comment #100) > Another problem I have found as I do want to test this UI. > > The Notebook Bar UI is already available as a UI in LibreOffice, BUT it is > called Tabbed UI. > > Can this be corrected so that users can easily identify the correct UI to > use? The Notebook Bar comes in 8 variants. https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/01/notebook_bar.html -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149096] Prevent 'Get' and 'Post' in submit methods field from being translated
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149096 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |serval2...@yahoo.fr |desktop.org | Status|NEW |ASSIGNED --- Comment #2 from Julien Nabet --- I gave a try with https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/c/core/+/134718 Robert: what's the difference between tdf#149226 and this one? Indeed both are about removing translation of "Get" and "Post" methods in Writer/formular. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 135501] Change the default UI (see comment 67)
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135501 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14 ||9230 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230 Buovjaga changed: What|Removed |Added Ever confirmed|0 |1 See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=13 ||5501 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149230] New: Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149230 Bug ID: 149230 Summary: Create sketches for ajlittoz's vision of a UI promoting the use of styles Product: LibreOffice Version: unspecified Hardware: All OS: All Status: UNCONFIRMED Keywords: difficultyInteresting, easyHack, skillDesign Severity: enhancement Priority: medium Component: UI Assignee: libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org Reporter: ilmari.lauhakan...@libreoffice.org In bug 135501 comment 81, ajlittoz made a good argument for improving LibreOffice UI in a way that encourages the use of styles. This task is about creating sketches for any or all of the UIs found in View - User Interface in order to make it appealing and convenient to use styles. The relevant part of ajlittoz's comment: UI is not the target in an application. The target is the usefulness of application purpose and UI is only a tool to serve this usefulness. What is the chore of LO and its distinctive power feature? Styles. Styles are present in Writer, Calc, Impress and Draw at different level of abstraction and power. Style usage should be encouraged by all means because they are the key to full LO power. When you must review and reformat a sophisticated document, the task is overwhelming if direct formatting was the base of the workflow. IMHO, M$ Office-like UIs are wrong because: 1 - they lead to the "intuitive application control" syndrome making users falsely think they master the application 2 - they encourage direct formatting because the alternative style control is not that obvious (and styles are far less developed in the competition) 3 - being immediately accessible, they postpone the need to read the Guides The net result is a tremendous number of angry questions on AskLO from users ranting that LO is not M$ Office. In my point of view, LO doesn't offer yet a full original style-oriented UI. In Writer, the paragraph styles sit in the toolbar with their own menu but character, frame, page and list are not there. You must display the side style pane and selecting one non-paragraph style requires first to click on an icon to change the displayed list. As a long-time advocate of styles, I find this is not the correct way to push users towards styling. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149217] Macro Writer: method getByIndex() for TextTables.Columns returns Void
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149217 raal changed: What|Removed |Added OS|Windows (All) |All Version|7.3.3.2 release |4.2.0.4 release Component|Writer |BASIC --- Comment #3 from raal --- Reproducible with Version 4.1.0.0.alpha0+ on Linux. Probably Inherited from OOo. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 132864] Harmony in position settings of different objects
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=132864 sdc.bla...@youmail.dk changed: What|Removed |Added CC||sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- Comment #18 from sdc.bla...@youmail.dk --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #10) > What is missing at the documentation? > > https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/shared/01/0526.html "To page" could be clarified to specify that "page" actually means "page number" "As character" is not correct about height of current line. (or, it is correct only under certain, but not all, circumstances). > https://help.libreoffice.org/latest/en-US/text/swriter/guide/anchor_object. > html?DbPAR=WRITER#bm_id3147828 First sentence (and rest of page) is missing critical information (which is also highly relevant to the discussion in this ticket). Here is first sentence. An object, such as an image, is positioned within a document using anchors attached to other elements. It is true that anchors "are used" -- but what is missing in that guide is: It is also *necessary* to specify the positioning options in relation to the anchor point. Simply mentioning the anchoring being used, without specifying the positioning options is more or less impossible to evaluate what will happen with a particular object when text or objects are added or removed from the document. (and there are additional complications -- but they can be, in principle, addressed in other help pages). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 149226] Form → Type of Submission: Wrong German Translation
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149226 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Summary|Form → Type of Submisson: |Form → Type of Submission: |Wrong German Translation|Wrong German Translation -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
