https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also|https://bugs.documentfounda |
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #15 from Mike Kaganski ---
Please notice that if you agree that this is a dupe, discussions that provide
valuable info should be held in the main bug, to keep all the relevant bits
together :)
--
You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #14 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Eyal Rozenberg from comment #13)
> (In reply to Noel Grandin from comment #10)
> > Accessing the current keyboard layout appears to be distro-specific
>
> Isn't there some X-related
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #13 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
(In reply to Noel Grandin from comment #10)
> Accessing the current keyboard layout appears to be distro-specific
Isn't there some X-related mechanism/protocol for doing this?
> FWIW localectl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #11 from Mike Kaganski ---
Basically, this is a dupe of bug 108151, which also has some discussion about
API availability, and an implementation of this for Qt5 from Jan-Marek.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #10 from Noel Grandin ---
Accessing the current keyboard layout appears to be distro-specific, so we'd
need to (a) get the current distro and then (b) implement a bunch of hacks to
get the current keyboard
FWIW localectl
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||avidseek...@protonmail.com
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #7 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Still the same behavior with:
Version: 7.5.0.0.alpha0+ / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 5c68399e6bea3aa18477487400f8bb143d6ed84e
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.18; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #6 from Eyal Rozenberg ---
Oh, I should mention I tested with:
Version: 6.2.0.0.alpha0+
Build ID: ad6adb1bfadf49af3187a0bb3ceffbf355e9eed1
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 4.9; UI render: default; VCL: gtk2;
TinderBox:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Eyal Rozenberg changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||eyal...@technion.ac.il
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #3 from Caolán McNamara ---
I imagine using libexttextcat would just introduce a pile of "my language was
guessed wrong" bugs. Especially for short sequences of text which won't be long
enough for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
--- Comment #1 from Caolán McNamara ---
IIRC we support this under Windows because the IM there has a property to
indicate the language the IM is for, while under Linux we don't cause it
doesn't.
e.g.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=113298
Yousuf Philips (jay) changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED
20 matches
Mail list logo