[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|needsUXEval |

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 Yousuf Philips (jay) changed: What|Removed |Added Blocks|94722

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 --- Comment #4 from Yousuf (Jay) Philips --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > But the question is whether we want to have larger patterns. No i dont think we should, though i believe i've seen some

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 --- Comment #3 from Heiko Tietze --- (In reply to Yousuf (Jay) Philips from comment #2) > I would say no ... but if you wanted to extend the bitmap pattern... Of course using a bitmap is always possible and would

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 Yousuf (Jay) Philips changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 --- Comment #1 from Heiko Tietze --- Additional to size and color per bit some people may also want to create non-rectangular patterns (cf. Penrose tiling). In my opinion this is out of scope, unfortunately. But

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added Keywords|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 100022] Large scale patterns

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=100022 Heiko Tietze changed: What|Removed |Added See Also|