https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|FIXED |WORKSFORME
--
You are receiving
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
s.p.he...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
Status|NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #16 from QA Administrators ---
Dear s.p.helma,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #15 from s.p.he...@gmx.net ---
I can confirm, that his bug is still present in:
Version: 7.2.2.2 / LibreOffice Community
Build ID: 20(Build:2)
CPU threads: 4; OS: Linux 5.14; UI render: default; VCL: gtk3
Locale: en-GB
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #14 from QA Administrators ---
Dear s.p.helma,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #13 from s.p.he...@gmx.net ---
I can confirm, that this bug is still present on:
Version: 6.3.2.2
Build ID: 1:6.3.2-0ubuntu0.18.04.1~lo1
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #12 from QA Administrators ---
Dear s.p.helma,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #11 from s.p.he...@gmx.net ---
I still believe, that there should be a visible clue to show the element under
the cursor. Nearly every program dealing with (vector) graphics does it.
Personally, I don't have any preference how
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze ---
Thanks for sharing the video. But I still think it's not a needed feature as a)
typically objects are not stacked like on 3D scenes or lines over images, b)
most users have not so many objects on the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #9 from Buovjaga ---
A video example of what preselection highlighting in 3D software looks like:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OmfyRi7yx1w (Blender)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|NEW
Resolution|WORKSFORME
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #6 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #5)
> You mean the line color turns into red or a fancy glow effect appears around
> it? And what happens in case of a red line or when the
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #4)
> So what is your view on pre-selection highlighting that me and the original
> reporter proposed? I'm sure there are some extremely
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
--- Comment #4 from Buovjaga ---
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> I wouldn't increase the hotspot area, at least not in general. Perhaps it
> could be adjusted according the zoom factor, if it isn't yet.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Heiko Tietze changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
s.p.he...@gmx.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||s.p.he...@gmx.net
---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104142
Buovjaga changed:
What|Removed |Added
Keywords||needsUXEval
18 matches
Mail list logo