[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 109258] Tooling produces duplicate string entries for translation

2017-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109258

--- Comment #23 from mi...@filmsi.net ---
Created attachment 135654
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=135654=edit
Duplicated po strings in LO code

These are the duplicated po strings in LO code that should be removed/tagged
uniquely.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 109258] Tooling produces duplicate string entries for translation

2017-08-19 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109258

--- Comment #22 from mi...@filmsi.net ---
I just wrote a script to find duplicate entries in all po(t) files in LO and it
is pretty simple (gettext libraries must be installed):
for f in $(find ./pot_LO54_2017-07-07 -type f -name '*.pot'); do msguniq -d
"$f"; done

This script shows there are or were 17 duplicate string entries in 8 po(t)
files (as of LO54 on July 7, 2017, which is the latest I have to test with).

I am attaching my shortened version of the report.

I will now update Slovenian po files that are affected by duplicated po
strings.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs


[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 109258] Tooling produces duplicate string entries for translation

2017-07-28 Thread bugzilla-daemon
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=109258

mi...@filmsi.net changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Localization|framework
Summary|LO54rc2: On MacOS   |Tooling produces duplicate
   |spell-checking has English  |string entries for
   |names for dictionaries  |translation
   |despite Slovenian langpack  |

--- Comment #21 from mi...@filmsi.net ---
Renaming the bug as it shows that the l10n process is not consistent with the
gettext/po standards producing double entries which leads to inconsistencies in
translations and should at all cost be avoided.

Currently the cost is low but it can lead to unwanted proportions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs