https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
eisa01 changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #17 from Andy M ---
Commenting due to request:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153#c16
Version 6.3.2.2 is displayed in column view as 6.3.2002, so the problem as
outlined in the first comment still
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #16 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Andy M,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #15 from Andy M ---
Tor:
"Naïvely, I would have thought that "CFBundleGetInfoString" exactly is used for
something to show to the user, when they "get info"."
You are correct. CFBundleGetInfoString is used when you select
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #14 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Responding to myself after a quick googling: Apparently CFBundleGetInfoString
has been deprecated almost for ten years... http://www.openradar.me/8600732
--
You are receiving this mail because:
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #13 from Tor Lillqvist ---
Btw, any idea what the value for the key CFBundleGetInfoString is used for?
That contains our full "real" version number, doesn't it?
Naïvely, I would have thought that "CFBundleGetInfoString"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #12 from Andy M ---
"...this is still confusing because for 6.1.3 seeing 6.1.32 may lead to the
impression that the latter would be a higher/later release version, even worse
if some version checking mechanism encounters such
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #11 from Eike Rathke ---
Dropping the micro is not a solution because then nothing differentiates micro
releases.
If Apple per comment 8 arbitrarily limits things to three numbers AND the third
number can't have more than
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Tor Lillqvist changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|t...@iki.fi |
Priority|medium
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|NEW
CC|
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Andy M changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Resolution|NOTOURBUG
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Xisco Faulí changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #8 from Andy M ---
Interesting, thanks Jan-Marek.
1) 6.1.0.3 becomes 6.1.3 with the current setup which is clearly incorrect and
misleading.
As an end-user, changing this version number the way it does is very confusing.
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
--- Comment #7 from Jan-Marek Glogowski ---
>From "Technical Note TN2420: Version Numbers and Build Numbers"
https://developer.apple.com/library/archive/technotes/tn2420/_index.html
"The value for a version number or build number must
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=120153
Andy M changed:
What|Removed |Added
Summary|{macOS} Finder shows|{macOS} Finder shows
15 matches
Mail list logo
