[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #14 from Paul Menzel --- Sorry, I have no spare cycles to look into this. (By the way, we have Nextcloud and Collabora Online(?) support contract.) If nobody has time to look into this, I guess it’s fixed in newer 7.x

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 Julien Nabet changed: What|Removed |Added Status|NEW |NEEDINFO CC|

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed: What|Removed |Added Component|Installation

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #12 from Miklos Vajna --- master has 1.2.28, libreoffice-6-2 has 1.2.27. If updating to libxmlsec-1.2.28 in libreoffice-6-2 fixes this bug (or backporting other libxmlsec changes from master), then it's possible to do so. --

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #11 from Paul Menzel --- It is indeed a xmlsec problem. The merge/pull request *build: Increase minimal version numbers for NSPR/NSS* [1] is a start to fix the minimal required versions, so that the old headers are not

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #10 from Paul Menzel --- xmlsec prefers xulrunner-nss and xulrunner-nspr over the system versions [1]. ``` dnl Priority 3: Guess with pkg_config dnl dnl Mozilla's NSS/NSPR are distributed under different names in different

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #9 from Paul Menzel --- Building xmlsec directly, it looks like `nss.h` from the xulrunner installation is used for some reason. ``` $ ./autogen.sh $ ./configure $ make V=1 […] Making all in nss make[3]: Entering directory

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #8 from Miklos Vajna --- Perhaps it's a missing include in libxmlsec? You would have to sort this out at . What's your Linux distribution? I only have /usr/include/nss3, not

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #7 from Paul Menzel --- I installed NSS 3.43 (and NSPR 4.21), and still hit this error. $ nss-config --version 3.43.0 $ grep -R SEC_OID_SHA224 /usr/include/nss/ /usr/include/nss/secoidt.h:SEC_OID_SHA224

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added Severity|normal |enhancement -- You are receiving

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 Xisco Faulí changed: What|Removed |Added CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org ---

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 Miklos Vajna changed: What|Removed |Added Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW Ever confirmed|0

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #4 from Paul Menzel --- (In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #3) > You ask for a --with-system-nss, but then fail to supply a new enough nss. > Just don't use that switch if your nss is too old. I guess there is nothing >

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #3 from Miklos Vajna --- You ask for a --with-system-nss, but then fail to supply a new enough nss. Just don't use that switch if your nss is too old. I guess there is nothing to fix here. OK to close? -- You are receiving

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 --- Comment #2 from Paul Menzel --- (In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #1) > What build flags do you use? ``` --with-lang=de \ --with-help \ --with-jdk-home=/usr/local/java \

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910 Miklos Vajna changed: What|Removed |Added CC||vmik...@collabora.com ---