[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
 Status|NEEDINFO|RESOLVED

--- Comment #15 from Julien Nabet  ---
Thank you for the feedback.
Let's put this one to WFM then and if someone reproduces the pb, don't hesitate
to reopen this tracker or rather send a message on dev mailing list or IRC
since it's a build pb.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #14 from Paul Menzel 
 ---
Sorry, I have no spare cycles to look into this. (By the way, we have Nextcloud
and Collabora Online(?) support contract.)

If nobody has time to look into this, I guess it’s fixed in newer 7.x versions.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
 CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr

--- Comment #13 from Julien Nabet  ---
Now we've been using xmlsec1-1.3.1.tar.gz since
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=bfd479abf0d1d8ce36c3b0dcc6c824216f88a95b
so since 7.6 branch.
Is it better now?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:

   What|Removed |Added

  Component|Installation|LibreOffice

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #12 from Miklos Vajna  ---
master has 1.2.28, libreoffice-6-2 has 1.2.27. If updating to libxmlsec-1.2.28
in libreoffice-6-2 fixes this bug (or backporting other libxmlsec changes from
master), then it's possible to do so.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #11 from Paul Menzel 
 ---
It is indeed a xmlsec problem. The merge/pull request *build: Increase minimal
version numbers for NSPR/NSS* [1] is a start to fix the minimal required
versions, so that the old headers are not picked up.

Was xmlsec versions updated in LibreOffice 6.2?

[1]: https://github.com/lsh123/xmlsec/pull/263

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #10 from Paul Menzel 
 ---
xmlsec prefers xulrunner-nss and xulrunner-nspr over the system versions [1].

```
dnl Priority 3: Guess with pkg_config
dnl
dnl Mozilla's NSS/NSPR are distributed under different names in different
distribution,
dnl we are going to try all options:
dnl seamonkey-nspr and seamonkey-nss
dnl mozilla-nspr and mozilla-nss
dnl xulrunner-nspr and xulrunner-nss
dnl nspr and nss
if test "z$NSPR_FOUND" = "zno" -a "z$PKGCONFIG_FOUND" = "zyes" -a
"z$with_mozilla_ver" = "z" -a "z$with_seamonkey_ver" ; then
if test "z$NSPR_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSPR, seamonkey-nspr >= $NSPR_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSPR_FOUND=yes NSPR_PACKAGE=seamonkey-nspr],
   [NSPR_FOUND=no])
fi
if test "z$NSPR_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSPR, mozilla-nspr >= $MOZILLA_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSPR_FOUND=yes NSPR_PACKAGE=mozilla-nspr],
   [NSPR_FOUND=no])
fi
if test "z$NSPR_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSPR, xulrunner-nspr >= $NSPR_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSPR_FOUND=yes NSPR_PACKAGE=xulrunner-nspr],
   [NSPR_FOUND=no])
fi
if test "z$NSPR_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSPR, nspr >= $NSPR_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSPR_FOUND=yes NSPR_PACKAGE=nspr],
   [NSPR_FOUND=no])
fi
fi
if test "z$NSS_FOUND" = "zno" -a "z$PKGCONFIG_FOUND" = "zyes" -a
"z$with_mozilla_ver" = "z" -a "z$with_seamonkey_ver" ; then
if test "z$NSS_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSS, seamonkey-nss >= $SEAMONKEY_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSS_FOUND=yes NSS_PACKAGE=seamonkey-nss],
   [NSS_FOUND=no])
fi
if test "z$NSS_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSS, mozilla-nss >= $MOZILLA_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSS_FOUND=yes NSS_PACKAGE=mozilla-nss],
   [NSS_FOUND=no])
fi
if test "z$NSS_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSS, xulrunner-nss >= $NSS_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSS_FOUND=yes NSS_PACKAGE=xulrunner-nss],
   [NSS_FOUND=no])
fi
if test "z$NSS_FOUND" = "zno" ; then
PKG_CHECK_MODULES(NSS, nss >= $NSS_MIN_VERSION,
   [NSS_FOUND=yes NSS_PACKAGE=nss],
   [NSS_FOUND=no])
fi
fi
```

[1]:
https://github.com/lsh123/xmlsec/blob/f23c4266502363fafe72baa09bafed163a938dc0/configure.ac#L944-L995

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #9 from Paul Menzel 
 ---
Building xmlsec directly, it looks like `nss.h` from the xulrunner installation
is used for some reason.


```
$ ./autogen.sh
$ ./configure
$ make V=1
[…]
Making all in nss
make[3]: Entering directory '/dev/shm/xmlsec/src/nss'
/bin/sh ../../libtool  --tag=CC   --mode=compile gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I.
-I../..  -DPACKAGE=\"xmlsec1\" -I../../include -I../../include
-D__XMLSEC_FUNCTION__=__func__ -DXMLSEC_NO_SIZE_T -DXMLSEC_NO_GOST=1
-DXMLSEC_NO_GOST2012=1 -DXMLSEC_DL_LIBLTDL=1 -I/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9.2.16 
 -I/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9.2.16   -DXMLSEC_CRYPTO_NSS=1
-I/usr/include/libxml2   -I/usr/include/libxml2  -g -O2 -MT
libxmlsec1_nss_la-digests.lo -MD -MP -MF .deps/libxmlsec1_nss_la-digests.Tpo -c
-o libxmlsec1_nss_la-digests.lo `test -f 'digests.c' || echo './'`digests.c
libtool: compile:  gcc -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -I. -I../.. -DPACKAGE=\"xmlsec1\"
-I../../include -I../../include -D__XMLSEC_FUNCTION__=__func__
-DXMLSEC_NO_SIZE_T -DXMLSEC_NO_GOST=1 -DXMLSEC_NO_GOST2012=1
-DXMLSEC_DL_LIBLTDL=1 -I/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9.2.16
-I/usr/include/xulrunner-1.9.2.16 -DXMLSEC_CRYPTO_NSS=1 -I/usr/include/libxml2
-I/usr/include/libxml2 -g -O2 -MT libxmlsec1_nss_la-digests.lo -MD -MP -MF
.deps/libxmlsec1_nss_la-digests.Tpo -c digests.c  -fPIC -DPIC -o
.libs/libxmlsec1_nss_la-digests.o
digests.c: In function 'xmlSecNssDigestInitialize':
digests.c:142:43: error: 'SEC_OID_SHA224' undeclared (first use in this
function); did you mean 'SEC_OID_SHA384'?
 ctx->digest = SECOID_FindOIDByTag(SEC_OID_SHA224);
   ^~
   SEC_OID_SHA384
digests.c:142:43: note: each undeclared identifier is reported only once for
each function it appears in
make[3]: *** [Makefile:648: libxmlsec1_nss_la-digests.lo] Error 1
```

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #8 from Miklos Vajna  ---
Perhaps it's a missing include in libxmlsec? You would have to sort this out at
.

What's your Linux distribution? I only have /usr/include/nss3, not
/usr/include/nss.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #7 from Paul Menzel 
 ---
I installed NSS 3.43 (and NSPR 4.21), and still hit this error.

$ nss-config --version
3.43.0
$ grep -R SEC_OID_SHA224 /usr/include/nss/
/usr/include/nss/secoidt.h:SEC_OID_SHA224 = 309,
$ grep -R SEC_OID_NIST_DSA_SIGNATURE_WITH_SHA256_DIGEST /usr/include/nss/
/usr/include/nss/secoidt.h:   
SEC_OID_NIST_DSA_SIGNATURE_WITH_SHA256_DIGEST = 315,

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   Severity|normal  |enhancement

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

Xisco Faulí  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||xiscofa...@libreoffice.org

--- Comment #6 from Xisco Faulí  ---
Hello Paul,
you can find information on how to submit a patch to gerrit here ->
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/gerrit/SubmitPatch
Thanks in advance

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

Miklos Vajna  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
 Ever confirmed|0   |1

--- Comment #5 from Miklos Vajna  ---
That's a good idea; care to send a patch? Setting as new, since the above
confirms that at least in your environment configure passes.

configure.ac:9284 has the current nss version requirement; can you check the
mentioned symbols were introduced in what nss version and increase it please?

Thanks.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #4 from Paul Menzel 
 ---
(In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #3)
> You ask for a --with-system-nss, but then fail to supply a new enough nss.
> Just don't use that switch if your nss is too old. I guess there is nothing
> to fix here. OK to close?

Shouldn’t some configure script check, what system NSS version is provided?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #3 from Miklos Vajna  ---
You ask for a --with-system-nss, but then fail to supply a new enough nss. Just
don't use that switch if your nss is too old. I guess there is nothing to fix
here. OK to close?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

--- Comment #2 from Paul Menzel 
 ---
(In reply to Miklos Vajna from comment #1)
> What build flags do you use?

```
--with-lang=de \
--with-help \
--with-jdk-home=/usr/local/java \
--with-ant-home=/package/mariux64/ant \
--without-doxygen \
--without-junit \
--disable-dconf \
--disable-epm \
--disable-odk \
--enable-release-build \
--enable-python=internal \
--with-system-apr \
--with-system-cairo \
--with-system-curl \
--with-system-expat \
--with-system-harfbuzz \
--with-system-icu \
--with-system-jpeg \
--with-system-lcms2 \
--with-system-libatomic_ops \
--with-system-libpng \
--with-system-libxml \
--with-system-neon \
--with-system-nss \
--with-system-odbc \
--with-system-openldap \
--with-system-openssl \
--with-system-poppler \
--with-system-postgresql \
--with-system-serf \
--with-system-zlib
```

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 124910] xmlsec: Build fails with error: ‘SEC_OID_SHA224’ undeclared (first use in this function); did you mean ‘SEC_OID_SHA384’?

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124910

Miklos Vajna  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||vmik...@collabora.com

--- Comment #1 from Miklos Vajna  ---
What build flags do you use?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.___
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs