https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
--- Comment #9 from Wolfgang Jäger ---
In addition:
Based on my updated understanding parts of my original expectations are no
longer valid, and the chosen subject is misleading.
It should better read:
Validity>Custom>Formula wrongly
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
--- Comment #8 from Wolfgang Jäger ---
Tested with V 7.4.3.2 under Win 10
Behavior unchanged
Concerning my comment "judge {the new feature} to be completely useless" I
learned from Comment #4 by @Mike Kaganski (who expressly told to
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
--- Comment #7 from QA Administrators ---
Dear Wolfgang Jäger,
To make sure we're focusing on the bugs that affect our users today,
LibreOffice QA is asking bug reporters and confirmers to retest open, confirmed
bugs which have not been
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
--- Comment #6 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #5)
> ... but the check that it's in fact a range formula ...
sorry for the wrong use of "range formula" term here; I only meant "a formula
returning a
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
--- Comment #5 from Mike Kaganski ---
So the problem here seems that the two formula areas ("Custom" and "Cell
Range") are not separated and checked strictly.
1. The formulas in the two areas are expected to be different. The "Custom"
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to Wolfgang Jäger from comment #0)
> ... I first noticed that the Validity feature
> got the new Allow:>Custom>Formula variant.
>
> ... I judge it to be completely useless; 'Cell range'
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
Roman Kuznetsov <79045_79...@mail.ru> changed:
What|Removed |Added
Blocks||108988
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=131309
Cor Nouws changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||c...@nouenoff.nl
Ever
