[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133361] Character style applied to a footnote definition is not honored

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133361 --- Comment #4 from Jambunathan K --- > So the end result is this (in the absence of direct formatting, which would > add to complexity): first, character formatting from paragraph is evaluated > (taking e.g. font name and size); then

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133361] Character style applied to a footnote definition is not honored

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133361 Mike Kaganski changed: What|Removed |Added Resolution|--- |NOTABUG

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133361] Character style applied to a footnote definition is not honored

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133361 --- Comment #2 from Jambunathan K --- > Character style (in this case 'OrgSuperscript' style) applied to a footnote > definition is NOT honored. Expected Behaviour: First, OrgFootnoteAnchor gets applied. Then OrgSuperscript is

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 133361] Character style applied to a footnote definition is not honored

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=133361 --- Comment #1 from Jambunathan K --- Created attachment 161251 --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=161251=edit Screenshot of how bug.odt is rendered on my machine -- You are receiving this mail because: You are