https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|CLOSED
--
You are receiving this
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
Eike Rathke changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|REOPENED|RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||er...@redhat.com
--- Comment #8
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
buggymc...@bobmail.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |NOTABUG
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
buggymc...@bobmail.info changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|RESOLVED|REOPENED
Ever
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
--- Comment #4 from Mike Kaganski ---
But if you want to *enter* dates using such a notation, you need to tweak *date
acceptance patterns* at Options->Language Settings->Languages [1]. There you
may specify a Y-M pattern, and then when
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
--- Comment #3 from Mike Kaganski ---
(In reply to buggymcbug from comment #2)
> > No it is not "subjective", it is objectively *not* a date.
>
> Depends on your definition of "date".
LOL. It does not depend on "my" definition; it is
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
--- Comment #2 from buggymc...@bobmail.info ---
> No it is not "subjective", it is objectively *not* a date.
Depends on your definition of "date". It doesn't *have* to be a day, another
acceptable definition is: "a Point in time". A
https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=144377
Mike Kaganski changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
10 matches
Mail list logo
