[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

Stephan Bergmann  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Resolution|--- |FIXED
   Assignee|libreoffice-b...@lists.free |sberg...@redhat.com
   |desktop.org |
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |RESOLVED

--- Comment #8 from Stephan Bergmann  ---
This is a regression introduced with

"tdf#124503: Support JRE installations with unknown java.vendor property" that
will be fixed in LibreOffice 7.3 thanks to

"Make getVersionInformation always return a VersionInfo".

(What happens is that in jfw_plugin_getAllJavaInfos in
jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/sunjavaplugin.cxx, in the loop across all
vecInfos, checkJavaVersionRequirements was only called for a given vecInfo if

> vendorSettings.getVersionInformation(vecInfo->getVendor())

returns something, which it did not for a vecInfo representing a JRE from a
vendor not listed in gVendorMap in
jvmfwk/plugins/sunmajor/pluginlib/vendorlist.cxx, like "Eclipse Adoptium".)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Status|NEEDINFO|UNCONFIRMED
 CC||sberg...@redhat.com
 Ever confirmed|1   |0

--- Comment #7 from Julien Nabet  ---
Thank you paour for your quick feedback.

Stephan: since it concerns Java, thought you might be interested in this one.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

--- Comment #6 from paour  ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #3)
> Just for the test, could you give a try with 7.2.2 + brand new LO profile
> (see
> https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Corrupted_user_profile)?

Hello, It's already done
No change

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

--- Comment #5 from paour  ---
Hello,
No, there is no links.
OpnJDK works fine after with base!
Regards

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

Alex Thurgood  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||ipla...@tuta.io

--- Comment #4 from Alex Thurgood  ---
I'd be inclined to mark this as a duplicate of bug 144695, despite it being
specific to Windows, so for the time being, I'll just point to the other bug
report.

See also Stefan's comment in comment 2 on bug 144695.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

Alex Thurgood  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

   See Also||https://bugs.documentfounda
   ||tion.org/show_bug.cgi?id=14
   ||4695

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

Julien Nabet  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 Ever confirmed|0   |1
 Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEEDINFO
 CC||serval2...@yahoo.fr

--- Comment #3 from Julien Nabet  ---
Just for the test, could you give a try with 7.2.2 + brand new LO profile (see
https://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA/FirstSteps#Corrupted_user_profile)?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

--- Comment #2 from paour  ---
Created attachment 176258
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=176258=edit
The same with Java JRE

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

[Libreoffice-bugs] [Bug 145695] List x86 openJDK JRE with libreoffice x64

[bugzilla-daemon]

https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=145695

paour  changed:

   What|Removed |Added

 CC||pa...@free.fr

--- Comment #1 from paour  ---
Created attachment 176257
  --> https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=176257=edit
Advanced java options list

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.